<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: DenShazo15's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=DenShazo15</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-19T04:44:16-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-19T04:44:16-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Music from back in the day has more meaning than modern music</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Music-from-back-in-the-day-has-more-meaning-than-modern-music/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Music from the 60's to 80's has had more meaning behind its lyrics than modern day music. Not only is modern music repetitive, it almost never has a moral or story behind it.

First round is to accept my challenge and to post opening arguments, second round is for main arguments, and third round for rebuttals.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Music-from-back-in-the-day-has-more-meaning-than-modern-music/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-06T13:12:21-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
