<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: PeacefulChaos' Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=PeacefulChaos</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-22T16:53:30-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T16:53:30-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>In a fight, Voldemort and Dumbledore would beat Megatron and Optimus Prime.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-a-fight-Voldemort-and-Dumbledore-would-beat-Megatron-and-Optimus-Prime./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;&quot;&gt;I thank in advance to whoever accepts this challenge. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Burden of Proof:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I must prove the full resolution, which is, &quot;In a fight, Voldemort and Dumbledore would beat Megatron and Optimus Prime.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opponent must negate the full resolution and prove, &quot;In a fight, Megatron and Optimus Prime would beat Voldemort and Dumbledore.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. There will be no abuse of semantics, loopholes, wordplay, etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. I ask that the person who accepts this knows a little about Harry Potter and Transformers, as these are where the characters are coming from. This is not a required rule, but it is something that would be useful to have in this debate. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. We will be assuming that all characters will be using the full extent of their powers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. Voldemort will be armed with his normal wa</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-a-fight-Voldemort-and-Dumbledore-would-beat-Megatron-and-Optimus-Prime./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-30T17:29:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marijuana should become legalised</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Marijuana-should-become-legalised/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This debate is on the issue of the legalisation of Marijuana. &amp;nbsp;The legalisation shall be to legalise the drug, also known by its technical name &lt;em&gt;Cannabis Sativa &lt;/em&gt;and street names &quot;&lt;span&gt;weed, marijuana, green, hash, skunk&quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;The first round is for acceptance. &amp;nbsp;The fourth round is not for presenting new arguments. &amp;nbsp;The fifth round is in case anyone forfeits, we can simply use on of the &quot;spares&quot; in order to finish the debate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Marijuana-should-become-legalised/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-12T14:24:23-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>One Piece Universe vs. Naruto Universe</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/One-Piece-Universe-vs.-Naruto-Universe/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Yup, it's another classic pirates vs. ninjas debate, except these aren't any ordinary pirates or ninjas! The full resolution is, &quot;In a war, the One Piece universe would beat the Naruto universe.&quot; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Burden of Proof - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I, Pro, must prove that in a war between the One Piece universe and Naruto universe, the former would win.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opponent, Con, must prove that in a war between the One Piece universe and Naruto universe, the latter would win. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules for Battle - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. All current characters in the series will be restored to full health and power.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. All deceased characters will be brought back to life with full health and power.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Any characters that died before the series began (i.e. the Sage of the Six Paths, Gol D. Roger, etc.) will be excluded from rule number two. This includes the ten tails. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. The only exception to rule number three is </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/One-Piece-Universe-vs.-Naruto-Universe/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-25T05:58:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rinnegan is better than Sharingan</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rinnegan-is-better-than-Sharingan/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) i am for rinnegan. con starts the argument</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rinnegan-is-better-than-Sharingan/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-18T19:05:55-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Best Super Power</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Best-Super-Power/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I thank kyro90 in advance for accepting this debate. We have both reached an agreement on what super powers we will be arguing for and what the rules will be. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BOP-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I, Pro, must prove that the ability to find anything you wish is a better power than invisibility. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opponent, Con, must prove that the power to turn in invisible is better than the ability to find anything you wish. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Although this should not be necessary, there will be no abuse of semantics, loopholes, and/or word play. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. We can not exploit our powers to make them God-like nor can we use them to attain other powers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the purposes of this debate, &quot;better&quot; will be defined as &quot;more useful&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look forward to a fun debate. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Best-Super-Power/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-01-20T21:07:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bowser vs the Sonic the Hedgehog. Hopefully...</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Bowser-vs-the-Sonic-the-Hedgehog.-Hopefully.../1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The first round is for acceptance only. In a one-on-one battle, Bowser from &quot;Mario&quot; could defeat Sonic the Hedgehog from &quot;Sonic the Hedgehog.&quot;

The rules are as follows:

1. There will be no abuse of linguistics, semantics, or such in the debate.
2. Items are not allowed in this debate.
3. The setting of the fight is a square field that is ten miles on each side. This square can not be exited.
4. No allies are allowed in this battle. An ally in this debate is anything that can act on its own to aid the battler. Therefore, a robot that aids Sonic or a Koopa aiding Bowser is an ally.
5. Invincibility stars are not allowed in this debate (emphasis).

BOP: Pro, (I), must prove that Bowser could defeat Sonic the Hedgehog.
BOP: Con, (PeacefulChaos), must prove that Sonic the Hedgehog could defeat Bowser.
Neither side can argue for a tie.
I guess that's it. I hope my opponent enjoys this debate as I do.

Please disregard the other debate challenge, as I</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Bowser-vs-the-Sonic-the-Hedgehog.-Hopefully.../1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-20T17:16:57-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The sun is better than the moon</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-sun-is-better-than-the-moon/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) the sun is better</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-sun-is-better-than-the-moon/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-12T14:22:22-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wierdman's Tourney- Animal Testing</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Wierdmans-Tourney-Animal-Testing/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I thank Cobo in advance for accepting this debate. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BOP-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;I will be against animal testing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opponent will be for animal testing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitions-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Animal Testing: the&amp;nbsp;use of non-human animals &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;in&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;research&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;development&lt;/span&gt; projects, &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;esp.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; purposes of &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;determining&lt;/span&gt; the &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;safety&lt;/span&gt; of substances such as foods or &lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;drugs [1].&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Although this should not be necessary, there will be no abuse of semantics, wordplay,&amp;nbsp;and/or loopholes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #333333;&quot;&gt;With that said, I hand over the next round to my opponent. And tha</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Wierdmans-Tourney-Animal-Testing/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-01-05T22:11:06-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What came first, the chicken or the egg</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/What-came-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) The egg came first</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/What-came-first-the-chicken-or-the-egg/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-10-25T17:54:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you accept the challenge then I win, if you don't then I lose.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/If-you-accept-the-challenge-then-I-win-if-you-dont-then-I-lose./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The rules is in the topic title. If you accept the challenge to this debate, then I automatically win no matter what, if no one accepts the challenge to this debate then I automatically lose. It is your choice!

Oh! Did I mention that if you accept the challenge to this debate then you get a free cookie! :D</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/If-you-accept-the-challenge-then-I-win-if-you-dont-then-I-lose./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-20T20:42:23-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Do or do not, there is no try&quot;-Yoda</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Do-or-do-not-there-is-no-try-Yoda/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;p&gt;This is my first debate on Debate.org, so I am pretty excited about it! The first round will be for acceptance only. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Resolution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The resolution states, &amp;ldquo;Do or do not, there is no try&amp;rdquo;, a famous quote from Yoda. I, con, will be arguing against this statement. I will be stating that there &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; such thing as trying. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; My opponent, pro, will agree with the resolution. He/she will try to prove that there&lt;em&gt; isn't&lt;/em&gt; such thing as trying. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Therefore, I stand firm in the following statement: There is such thing as trying.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Do-or-do-not-there-is-no-try-Yoda/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-10-10T16:43:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Werewolves vs. Vampires</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Werewolves-vs.-Vampires/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;I thank my opponent for accepting this debate. The first round will be for acceptance and clarification only. The full resolution is, &quot;Werewolves would beat vampires in a world war.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Burden of Proof&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt; It is my duty to affirm the full resolution and prove that werewolves would beat vampires in a war concerning the whole world. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt; My opponent must prove that vampires would beat werewolves in a world war.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitions:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif; font-size: </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Werewolves-vs.-Vampires/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-24T12:10:16-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gum in School</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gum-in-School/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Should gum be allowed in school? Many people have considered this argument. Well, in my opinion, gum SHOULD be allowed in school. I thank anyone who goes against me. Debating is such fun! Feel free to add any comments.

1st round is acceptance. Thank you.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gum-in-School/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-04T21:46:49-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cats are better than dogs</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Cats-are-better-than-dogs/5/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Both rounds are for all out debate. No abuse of semantics, dictionary's, or any form of abuse towards words. Any word that is used in this debate will contain only one meaning. Also, when I mean dog, I am talking about a fully grown dog, not just a puppy or a one year old dog. I thank my opponent in advance for accepting this debate and I await his approval and first argument for this debate. As the topic states, &quot;Cats are better than dogs&quot; and as my position states, I am pro meaning I am for this topic's literal meaning. 

Burden of proof 

First

Cats are better in size. They will take up less space as they will be much smaller than a dog (not a puppy or one year old dog as a I specified above). They are very space conservative since they will stay in their small bed and they have a litter box.

Second

Cats are easier to handle (in most cases). They will not slobber everywhere like most dogs do. They will shed hair on sofas, but it will be easy to </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Cats-are-better-than-dogs/5/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-04T17:21:22-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dumbledore with Harry's wand(before it was broken) vs Voldermort with the unbeatable wand!</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dumbledore-with-Harrys-wand-before-it-was-broken-vs-Voldermort-with-the-unbeatable-wand/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I believe Dumbledore would win against Voldermort using just Harry's wand since Dumbledore was able to defeat his old childhood friend that carried the unbeatable wand. I'll give more detail if someone accepts this challenge =)</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dumbledore-with-Harrys-wand-before-it-was-broken-vs-Voldermort-with-the-unbeatable-wand/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-12-16T15:14:40-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Story Battle(1)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Story-Battle-1/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is just to see who can post the best stories. We will each create 3 stories and one story per round. A story containing &quot;unnecessary&quot; language or content will be counted as a forfeited round. 

There will be no abuse of semantics, dictionary references , multiple advantages from the dictionary, double meanings, or abuse of any kind toward any form whatsoever on this debate.

The stories will begin in round two.

I thank my opponent in advance for accepting this debate and I hope he will have pleasure with this debate.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Story-Battle-1/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-01-07T12:55:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>cats are better pets to have then dogs</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/cats-are-better-pets-to-have-then-dogs/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;first round is foacceptance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/cats-are-better-pets-to-have-then-dogs/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-04-20T17:28:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>(Anime) Which one is better Sasuke or Naruto</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Anime-Which-one-is-better-Sasuke-or-Naruto/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Really simple Sasuke or Naruto</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Anime-Which-one-is-better-Sasuke-or-Naruto/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-18T19:13:37-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>There is such thing as trying.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-is-such-thing-as-trying./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I thank MasterKage in advance for accepting this debate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BOP-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I, pro, must prove that trying exists. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My opponent, con, must prove that trying does not exist. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitions-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Try: to attempt to do or accomplish [1] &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No other definitions should be necessary. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. This debate stems off the quote, &quot;Do or do not, there is no try&quot;-Yoda. Thus, the only definition of the word &quot;try&quot; that will be accepted in this debate is the one that is presented above. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Although this should not be necessary, there will be no abuse of semantics, loopholes, wordplay, etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look forward to a fun, challenging debate! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/try&quot;&gt;[1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/try&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-is-such-thing-as-trying./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-01-27T21:48:32-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Animal Testing</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Animal-Testing/11/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The first round is just to state our positions clearly and I thank my opponent in advance for accepting. 

My position is Animal Testing should not be allowed. 

There will be no abuse of semantics, dictionaries, literary terms, definitions, and any form of abuse of any kind.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Animal-Testing/11/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-24T14:08:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
