<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Wallstreetatheist's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=Wallstreetatheist</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-20T05:45:57-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-20T05:45:57-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Grammer iz moore impoortent then spehling.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Grammer-iz-moore-impoortent-then-spehling./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Furst rownd iz 4 akseptense ownly. Awpwnint muzt pruv spehling maters moore then grammer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Grammer shell bee dfined az: &quot;Teh struckturl relasionchip off ah languge.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;Spehling shell bee dfined az: &quot;Teh coreect &lt;span&gt;hors d'oeuvre off teh leterrs n ah were'd.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maa teh besst men wen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Grammer-iz-moore-impoortent-then-spehling./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-17T18:35:14-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Individuals have a moral obligation to assist those in need.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Individuals-have-a-moral-obligation-to-assist-those-in-need./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Resolved: Individuals have a moral obligation to assist those in need.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules and Conditions:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. This is the November/December topic for 2011 in LD. Thus, this will be treated as an LD debate. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;2. Both traditional and progressive cases are allowed. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;3. Cases are allowed to be posted in google documents if they exceed the&amp;nbsp;8000 character limit. All rebuttals must be inside the limit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;4. Forfeit means automatic loss, unless this rule is voided by the non-forfeiting debater.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round structure:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round One:&amp;nbsp;Neg proposes debate, aff accepts and posts case.&lt;br /&gt;Round Two: Neg posts case and&amp;nbsp;rebuttal. Aff posts rebuttal.&lt;br /&gt;Round Three: Neg posts&amp;nbsp;rebuttal, aff posts last rebuttal.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Deviation from this round structure is automatic deduction of conduct point for one offense, automatic loss for two.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Individuals-have-a-moral-obligation-to-assist-those-in-need./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-22T21:11:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: The average intelligence of a Fox News Anchor is = or &lt; the average intelligence of a rock</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-The-average-intelligence-of-a-Fox-News-Anchor-is-or-the-average-intelligence-of-a-rock/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The resolution is pretty straightforward, Pro must argue why the average Fox News anchorman is about as smart as a rock or less than that of a rock, while the con must argue that Fox News anchormen are capable of intellectual thought, reasoning, and logical conclusions based on evidence. 

First round is acceptance only :D</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-The-average-intelligence-of-a-Fox-News-Anchor-is-or-the-average-intelligence-of-a-rock/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-18T14:52:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Music Competition of Awesomeness</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Music-Competition-of-Awesomeness/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Music Competition of Awesomeness&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Format&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;1: Acceptance, Clarifications&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;2-4: Instrument Shredding Badassery&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;1. Each of your rounds must be a different genre (e.g. Rock, Classical, Bluegrass). Our rounds function independently in this regard. Please state each round's genre in the argument space.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;2. All music must come from your instrument. No pre-recorded tracks.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;3. You can use effects</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Music-Competition-of-Awesomeness/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-15T00:10:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ODT: Pollution--Rothbardian Property Rights vs. Mainstream Decreasing Negative Externalities</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/ODT-Pollution-Rothbardian-Property-Rights-vs.-Mainstream-Decreasing-Negative-Externalities/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Debates must be 4 rounds. 1st round is acceptance, definitions, and clarifications.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;2. 72 hour debate rounds&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;3. 8k character limits&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;4. 1 week voting period&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;5. All debates must be headed with ODT (Official DDO Tournament)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;---Ex: ODT: Global Warming is Awesome&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;6. The first forfeit in any round of the debate, forfeits the entire debate for that debater.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Better solluti</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/ODT-Pollution-Rothbardian-Property-Rights-vs.-Mainstream-Decreasing-Negative-Externalities/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-03T11:57:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>star wars vs star trek</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/star-wars-vs-star-trek/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is my opinion is that I think that star wars is so much better than star trek cause I love light sabers</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/star-wars-vs-star-trek/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-25T16:03:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Woodrow Wilson was a bad president.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./4/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;First round is acceptance.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./4/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-25T00:37:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is the g-string the most susceptible to breaking on an acoustic six string steel guitar</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-the-g-string-the-most-susceptible-to-breaking-on-an-acoustic-six-string-steel-guitar/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I love guitars. For some reason I have a passion for guitar strings. I have snapped the g-string more than any other string. I snapped the g-string from loosening and even a simple tuning adjustment. The g-string is under the most tension. Furthermore, it is wrapped unlike the high e string, which is plain steel. The high e although tuned to a higher is under less tension. In addition, more bends are done on the g-string. As a resuit it wears out faster than the other strings The g-string also has the thinnest core of all the strings. For those reasons the g-string is the easiest to break.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-the-g-string-the-most-susceptible-to-breaking-on-an-acoustic-six-string-steel-guitar/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-26T22:36:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Google+ Hangout Debate: Justice Requires the Recognition of Animal Rights</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Google-Hangout-Debate-Justice-Requires-the-Recognition-of-Animal-Rights/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolved:&lt;/strong&gt; Justice Requires the Recognition of Animal Rights&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Good debate, Lars. Hope to do a good one on Insider Trading in a few days.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Debate ends at 45:30. Feel free to skip through the prep time periods.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Pro/Affirmative: Wallstreetatheist (blue shirt and Americanish)&lt;br /&gt;Con/Negative: larztheloser (black sweatshirt and New Zealandish--think Flight of the Conchords)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz7oRtDkf9M%20&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz7oRtDkf9M&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Google-Hangout-Debate-Justice-Requires-the-Recognition-of-Animal-Rights/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-10-07T04:30:37-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Woodrow Wilson was a bad president.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./3/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Woodrow Wilson was a bad president.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(1) Debater must have typing experience and internet access.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(2) Place your arguments and sources inside the debate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(3) Structure the debate in a readable, coherent fashion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(4)&amp;nbsp;No semantics, trolling, or lawyering.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(5) Must insert one witty quote per round.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-fam</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./3/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-08T13:24:34-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In human reproduction, vaginal birth is superior to anal birth.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-human-reproduction-vaginal-birth-is-superior-to-anal-birth./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;In human reproduction, vaginal birth is superior to anal birth.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rounds&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;1 - Acceptance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;2 - Main argument&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;3 - Rebuttals and insults&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small; text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;THERE ARE NO RULES&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-human-reproduction-vaginal-birth-is-superior-to-anal-birth./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-04-28T16:17:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mitt Romney isn't telling the Truth (as a GOP candidate)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-isnt-telling-the-Truth-as-a-GOP-candidate/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span id=&quot;hotword&quot;&gt;&lt;span id=&quot;hotword&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;The guy who is the son of former Michigan Governor George Romney. &amp;nbsp;This dude&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Mitt+Romney&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;biw=1440&amp;amp;bih=799&amp;amp;gbv=2&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;tbnid=tCWkcCCUevZLNM:&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt_romney_political_biography.htm&amp;amp;docid=MOyBA0E9sHFBoM&amp;amp;imgurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt-romney.jpg&amp;amp;w=413&amp;amp;h=310&amp;amp;ei=n1OCT_KKB6L00gHGy5TwBw&amp;amp;zoom=1&amp;amp;iact=hc&amp;amp;vpx=188&amp;amp;vpy=188&amp;amp;dur=1282&amp;amp;hovh=194&amp;amp;hovw=259&amp;amp;tx=222&amp;amp;ty=88&amp;amp;sig=110620478381020958068&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;tbnh=139&amp;amp;tbnw=195&amp;amp;start=0&amp;amp;ndsp=32&amp;amp;ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:135&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Mitt+Romney&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;biw=1440&amp;amp;bih=799&amp;amp;gbv=2&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;tbnid=tCWkcCCUevZLNM:&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt_r</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-isnt-telling-the-Truth-as-a-GOP-candidate/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-04-16T23:16:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George W. Bush was a bad president.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/George-W.-Bush-was-a-bad-president./5/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;George W. Bush was a bad president.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(1) Debater must have typing experience and internet access.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(2) Place your arguments and sources inside the debate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(3) Structure the debate in a readable, coherent fashion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(4) No semantics, trolling, or lawyering.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(5) Must insert one witty quote per round.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CiRrk Additional Rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(6) No new evidence or arguments last round&lt;br /&gt;(7) Drops are concessions&lt;br /&gt;(8) Foreiture = loss&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rounds&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(1) Acceptance + Internet High Five&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(2) Main Argument&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(3) Rebuttal to opponent's main argument&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;(4) Response to rebuttal + closing arguments + voting issues (one paragraph)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/George-W.-Bush-was-a-bad-president./5/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-29T00:01:57-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Barack Obama is not a Socialist</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Barack-Obama-is-not-a-Socialist/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I am arguing that Barack Obama is not a Socialist. Round 1 will be intro, and Round 2 will be the main argument.

Definition of Socialism:
 Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

Definition of Socialist:
 A person who advocates or practices Socialism.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Barack-Obama-is-not-a-Socialist/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-29T21:57:23-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Annemarie is a raving maniac.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Annemarie-is-a-raving-maniac./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) When thinking of what to write, I couldn't come across the words to describe the stupidity of this incompetent oaf who has no social status or societal meaning towards the advancement of our country. That is why I am asking for a strong PRO vote on today's resolution of Resolved: Annemarie is a raving maniac. 

I will now describe some key terms that are in relation to the resolution.

1. Annemarie- A name for a dumb insolent oaf who resides in an elitist neighborhood in Wheeling. 
2. maniac- Annemarie Krall

Contention One: Annemarie has proven nothing. 
In her existence on this thing we called the earth, Annemarie Krall has proved nothing towards the benefit of society. She has given nothing and proven too little to be considered a life form. For example, she is a bumbling oaf who can't decide what to say in a situation that makes her feel uncomfortable. She is dumb and I can't put it in any simpler terms. 

Contention Two: Annemarie doesn't even kn</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Annemarie-is-a-raving-maniac./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-01-20T23:27:07-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Islam is a religion of peace.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Islam-is-a-religion-of-peace./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Islam is a religion of peace.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;(1) Debater must have typing experience and internet access.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;(2) Place your arguments and sources inside the debate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;(3) Structure the debate in a readable, coherent fashion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;(4) No semantics, trolling, or lawyering.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font-family: 'trebuchet ms', geneva;&quot;&gt;(5) Must insert at least one witty quote per round.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small; font</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Islam-is-a-religion-of-peace./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-06-03T15:44:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Tariffs harm domestic and foreign economies.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Tariffs-harm-domestic-and-foreign-economies./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;This is part of round one of the economics debate tournament.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Resolution&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Resolved: Tariffs harm domestic and foreign economies.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Debater must have typing experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Debater must have internet access.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Must structure the debate in a readable, coherent fashion.&lt;br /&gt;Must insert one witty/interesting quote per round.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Please no lawyering, waging source wars, dictionary assaults (semantics), or fallacies.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rounds&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Acceptance + Internet High Five&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(2) </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Tariffs-harm-domestic-and-foreign-economies./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-04T16:03:35-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Woodrow Wilson was a bad president.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolution: &lt;/strong&gt;Woodrow Wilson was a bad president.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules&lt;/strong&gt;: Debater must have typing experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Debater must have internet access.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;No excuses or forfeitures.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Must structure the debate in a readable, coherent fashion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Must insert one witty quote per round.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rounds&lt;/strong&gt;: (1) Acceptance + Internet High Five&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(2) Main Argument &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: helvetica; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;(3) Rebuttal to opponent's main argument &lt;/span&gt;&lt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Woodrow-Wilson-was-a-bad-president./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-07T18:02:14-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vince Carter is the best dunker of all time</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Vince-Carter-is-the-best-dunker-of-all-time/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I believe that Vince Carter is the best dunker of all time. No question less talented than Jordan and others, but anyone out there actually think MJ, Dominique Wilkins, Kobe etc. were better dunkers?</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Vince-Carter-is-the-best-dunker-of-all-time/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-23T00:15:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Religion is given too much respect</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Religion-is-given-too-much-respect/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I am arguing that religion is given more respect than it deserves. It is considered rude to inquire their reasoning when it comes to their religion, however, it is not rude when inquiring about someone's political views. Both of these topics are based on belief and opinion, yet it is taboo to inquire about the reasoning behind one's religious beliefs.

As the instigator, I must argue that religion is given too much respect in today's society.

I await an opponent.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Religion-is-given-too-much-respect/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-29T07:20:40-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
