<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: WannabeMusketeer's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=WannabeMusketeer</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-24T09:39:27-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-24T09:39:27-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>The Conservative base of the Republican Party should support John McCain for President.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Conservative-base-of-the-Republican-Party-should-support-John-McCain-for-President./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Now that Senator John McCain has basically secured his nomination as the Republican Party's nominee for the 2008 Presidential election, he has a lot of work a head of him. He has to unify not only the country behind him, but his own party! I'm a very conservative Republican; the epitome of the Party's base. I refuse to cast a vote for John McCain. Except mildly on terror, he doesn't reflect the Party's views. He is constantly compromising his &quot;conservative&quot; views and values in Congress and the legislation he's created and helped pass do not support his claim as a conservative. Our party would be far better off if Senator Hillary Clinton were to be elected. If she wins, her outrageous proposals, especially withdrawal of troops from Iraq will prove to have catastrophic results. This will prove that she, just as her husband was on terror, a failure. Come 2012 the Republican Party will sweep back into both the executive and legislative branches for at least another</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Conservative-base-of-the-Republican-Party-should-support-John-McCain-for-President./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2008-02-10T17:06:17-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hollister is Overrated</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Hollister-is-Overrated/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) There are many designer stores out there for our teenage (and, some pre-teens) to enjoy; Abercrombie and Fitch, Aeropostale, American Eagle, Old Navy, Steve And Barry's, South Pole, and The Limited to name a few. However, one name stands out from all of these designer stores-Hollister. Owned by Abercrombie and Fitch, this store is made to appeal to both males and females, this &quot;surfer-friendly&quot; store sells products such as Polo shirts, t-shirts, jeans, hoodies, and other basic teen wear. 

However, Hollister is more of a popular store than its other main competitors, American Eagle and Aeropostale, which sell relatively the same products. Just why is this? The products do not greatly differ, and yet you cannot walk 3 minutes throughout a high school without seeing at least 9 or 10 teens donning this apparel.

But why?

I wish luck to my contender.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Hollister-is-Overrated/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2008-02-14T13:00:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mitt Romney vs. John McCain: Romney is a better choice for the Republican nomination.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-vs.-John-McCain-Romney-is-a-better-choice-for-the-Republican-nomination./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Former Massachusetts Governor, Mitt Romney, is the best choice for the Republican Presidential nomination. He has the experience as a business man and in the realm of business as a whole to lead America out of it's economic low. He can bring America's economy to it's golden ages. He is also an overall good conservative on all the issues that are important to the hardcore conservative base of the party. He also has the leadership skills, seeing that he has already lead a state in the eecutive branch. John McCain is barely a Republican, let alone a conservative. He doesn't connect with the conservative base, and more times than not compromises the party's position to side with the democrats. His views are very liberal on many issues, and doesn't have the leadership qualities we need in the next four, and possibly eight years. Lastly, he;s hardly the face of the Republican Party we'd like to have in this crucial election.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-vs.-John-McCain-Romney-is-a-better-choice-for-the-Republican-nomination./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2008-02-17T22:00:31-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
