<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Yep's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=Yep</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-22T03:34:13-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T03:34:13-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Moral Permissibility is acceptability, not obligation.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Moral-Permissibility-is-acceptability-not-obligation./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I'm open to all debate styles. I am affirming, and the first round is for acceptance only. Debate will be AC, NC and Refutations, AC Rebuttal, NC Rebuttal. 3 round debate</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Moral-Permissibility-is-acceptability-not-obligation./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-21T20:07:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>the kindle is better than books</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/the-kindle-is-better-than-books/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) alright, please accept this debate. This should be fun with a small word count

Argument: The kindle is better than books because The kindle is strong and light, as well as portable. Not to mention the kindle can keep hundreds of books in a small device. Plus the books you can buy are a lot cheaper than hard copies.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/the-kindle-is-better-than-books/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-27T21:18:06-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>We should not attack Iran</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/We-should-not-attack-Iran/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round is acceptance. I look forward to an interesting debate. Also, try to keep arguments short and to the point.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/We-should-not-attack-Iran/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-27T21:34:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Peyton Manning will not win more than 9 games or take the Broncos to the playoffs</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Peyton-Manning-will-not-win-more-than-9-games-or-take-the-Broncos-to-the-playoffs/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round is acceptance. My opponents job is to state ad give the best information showing Peyton Manning will win more tn 9 games and will make it to the playoffs and win their division.

I will be showing that i believe Peyton Manning will not win more than 9 games or make it to the playoffs.

No argument is to be posted in first round just acceptance. 

I wish my opponent best of luck.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Peyton-Manning-will-not-win-more-than-9-games-or-take-the-Broncos-to-the-playoffs/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-29T20:31:43-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Choose</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Choose/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) My opponent gets to choose the topic of this debate. I'll argue against whatever it is! 

Yea bro! Lolololololololz. LEt's have some fun nubs.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Choose/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-20T19:13:22-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Right to Own , Keep, and Bear Arms</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Right-to-Own-Keep-and-Bear-Arms/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The Right to Own, Keep, and Bear Arms is an individual right, and one that law abiding citizens should be free to exercise without fear of the government restricting this right. That the right to self defense is a basic human right, and should not be infringed upon. That his right actually makes society safer, not more dangerous, to live in.

The first round will just be for acceptance, the following three will be for the actual debate.

I accept any challenger, but please keep this a respectful debate.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Right-to-Own-Keep-and-Bear-Arms/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-17T20:48:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abortion</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Abortion/151/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I'm con for abortion completely agents it.
abortion- the termination of a poignancy without the mother having high risk of death.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Abortion/151/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-15T10:35:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I am awesome</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-am-awesome/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Well this should be a fun debate.&lt;br /&gt;The resolution is &quot;I (defined as the&amp;nbsp;DDO user named Zaradi) am awesome&quot;&lt;br /&gt;Pro will be defending this resolution.&lt;br /&gt;Con will be&amp;nbsp;negating this resolution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The BOP will be on the pro debator to prove that I am, indeed awesome.&lt;br /&gt;I will attempt to disprove him at every turn.&lt;br /&gt;Conceded arguments&amp;nbsp;are to be counted as truth.&lt;br /&gt;No new arguments in the&amp;nbsp;final round.&lt;br /&gt;Pro will go first, and will use the first round for acceptance and posting their case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good luck to whomever accepts.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-am-awesome/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-12T13:07:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The universe can not exist without an intelligent designer</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-universe-can-not-exist-without-an-intelligent-designer/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This debate addresses the topic: The universe can not exist without an intelligent designer. I will argue pro. For me to win, I will have to prove that the universe couldn't exist without an Intelligent designer. For con to win, they will have to prove that the universe can exist without an intelligent designer.

First round: Acceptance
Second round: opening arguments
Third round: rebuttals

I look forward to what should be an interesting debate.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-universe-can-not-exist-without-an-intelligent-designer/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-01T09:21:43-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dogs Are Better Than Cats</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dogs-Are-Better-Than-Cats/10/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This ought to be fun...
Rules:
first round is case, second round rebuttal, third round defense and conclusion (no new rebuttals)
............................................................................................................................
Point one: Dogs are capable of compassion, along with other traits
It is a well known fact that dogs love people. Cats, on the other hand are selfish (and haters), and couldn't care less about you, provided they get their cat food; which is arguably the only reason cats don't ditch you. Dogs, however, will not intentionally leave you. Dogs are faithful,compassionate and better than cats. Why do you think the dogs chase the cats?
Point two: Cats are heartless and hold grudges
for the first part(cats are heartless) my proof is with science. Since dogs are loving, compassionate, and benevolent, and cats are the opposite of dogs, cats are hateful, selfish, and malevolent. And since dogs have hearts, cats don'</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dogs-Are-Better-Than-Cats/10/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-25T21:39:41-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Altruism does not exist.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Altruism-does-not-exist./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Before accepting this debate, please read over the following notes.

My Position aims to attack not Altruism(The idea), but how we as human beings look at it(How we describe certain ideas as altruistic when in reality they are not). I believe Altruism does not exist in our Moral Society. 

Definitions- 

Exist- To occur 

Altruism- The principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others

After the following rules and definitions are accepted, the first round will be for acceptance. This will be a 1 Round Debate (not including the first round), where I as Pro will State my case, then the negative will proceed to refute the arguments. IF the negative successfully refutes the arguments, they win (not just stating a case for why it exists, instead look towards why i am wrong) If any points are left up by the affirmative, or are not successfully refuted by the negative, then the affirmative wins.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Altruism-does-not-exist./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-25T16:25:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Life is a prerequisite to all other rights.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Life-is-a-prerequisite-to-all-other-rights./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I stand in affirmation. First round is for acceptance.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Life-is-a-prerequisite-to-all-other-rights./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-21T20:08:16-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>IPhone VS Android</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/IPhone-VS-Android/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Apple Iphone is a far better software than any android out on the market. The facts to prove this entails; Apple is the sole provider of the IPhone, whereas the android market is flooded with multiple carriers who have a different say in the software. The Iphone is much more user friendly; due to many suppliers for the android software, each phone is developed differently in operating per provider. The reliability of the IPhone shatters any credibility to any Android operator because of many software issues that come up on a day to day basis with them</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/IPhone-VS-Android/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-27T21:02:32-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>should unhealthy foods be banned in schools</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/should-unhealthy-foods-be-banned-in-schools/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I think that unhealthy foods should be allowed in schools because we should be able to make the decision of what we consume in our bodies and what we don't.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/should-unhealthy-foods-be-banned-in-schools/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-06T21:50:40-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama or Harper?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Obama-or-Harper/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I need someone to help me for a school debate... give me whether you like Obama or Harper. Give me reasons please.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Obama-or-Harper/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-29T02:57:57-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abortion</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Abortion/152/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Abortion is wrong, there are two many reasons.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Abortion/152/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-09T19:31:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Speed Limit Should Be Lowered</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Speed-Limit-Should-Be-Lowered/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I Think that it should not be lowered</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Speed-Limit-Should-Be-Lowered/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-23T17:10:57-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>kobe bryant vs Lebron James</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/kobe-bryant-vs-Lebron-James/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I would just like my opponent to take into consideration that while stats are important they are not everything. In this debate I am breaking every aspect of each players games which means it might be unsettled but just two of us voicing our opinions. This includes there athleticism and advantages/disadvantages. 

With that being said, I'd like this to be very unbiased, and a good intelligent debate.

I'd also invite my opponent and any other user to watch this video first on Kobe Bryant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyKgaeAoa-g

And this video on Lebron James http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST9YW4pjXvY&amp;list=FLEebD1KbW_-e5U-1_D9ayzQ&amp;index=79&amp;feature=plpp_video


Lets begin.

Kobe vs Lebron(scoring overall)
Well Lebron statistically speaking does average more points, more rebounds and assists then Kobe does. BUT like I said there is more to is then stats. Lets take into consideration that Kobe's first few seasons he didn't start which hurt his career</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/kobe-bryant-vs-Lebron-James/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-28T16:58:23-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
