<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: pbplk58's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=pbplk58</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-26T00:13:05-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-26T00:13:05-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>yo momma fight</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/yo-momma-fight/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I'm new to this site and I've seen a lot of yo momma debates going around, so for my first debate I decided to try one.
Good luck to my opponent, whoever it may be.

Rules:
1. Post 3 yo momma jokes
2. This is just for fun, don't freak out or anything lol

Now, my 3 jokes:

1. Yo momma's so fat, she's got more chins than a Chinese phone book
2. Yo momma's so old, when she was born the Dead Sea was only sick
3. Yo momma's so fat, she jumped up in the air and got stuck</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/yo-momma-fight/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-01-03T12:59:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chuck Norris Facts</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Facts/2/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I have seen all these you mama joke debates going around and thought I might try one on Chuck Norris facts the rules are simple each round you post 3 Chuck Norris Facts at the end whoever the voter thought had better jokes gives all points to that person

1.Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door

2.Chuck Norris can strangle you with a cordless phone

3.Once there was a blind man the blind man accidentally bumped into Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris said &quot;do you know who i am&quot;
&quot;no i don't&quot; said the blind man &quot;I am Chuck Norris&quot; Chuck Norris replied the blind man was so amazed he was instantly cured of his blindness however the first last and only thing he saw was the fatal roundhouse kick of Chuck Norris</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Facts/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-01-09T13:22:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Public health concerns justify compulsory immunizations</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Public-health-concerns-justify-compulsory-immunizations/5/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) **Please do not accept this debate unless you debate LD**
I know this is the old resolution, but I didn't want to debate economic sanctions in fear of someone stealing my case. I really liked this topic so I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who still wanted to debate it. For the voters, here is the LD round breakdown:
ROUND 1:
Con-states rules
Pro-Case
ROUND 2:
Con-case/rebuttal
Pro-rebuttal/defence
ROUND 3:
Con-rebuttal/defence/crystallization
Pro-rebuttal/defence/crystallization
If you accept this debate please post your case in round 1 and we will continue. Good luck to whoever accepts.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Public-health-concerns-justify-compulsory-immunizations/5/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-01-22T18:10:19-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Battle of sports: Soccer (PRO) vs. Basketball (CON)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Battle-of-sports-Soccer-PRO-vs.-Basketball-CON/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I am arguing FOR soccer. Whoever accepts this debate will be arguing for basketball. The actual debate will commence in round 2.
Rules:
1. When accepting this debate you will post a single alphanumeric character as your response in round 1.
2. Debating will commence in round 2, where I will present my argument.
3. Your argument should consist of an explanation of why your sport is better than your opponent's sport and a response to your opponents arguments.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Battle-of-sports-Soccer-PRO-vs.-Basketball-CON/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-01-13T16:39:10-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
