<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: prepsexpot69's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=prepsexpot69</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-25T18:46:53-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-25T18:46:53-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Should abortion be legal -- no strings attached?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-abortion-be-legal-no-strings-attached/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Abortion should be put under VERY restrict use.

I do not believe that abortion should be accessible to just any person that is pregnant. Abortion is one of the most horrible acts a human being can take. Men can be just as guilty of abortion by convincing the woman carrying the developing embryo to have it surgically removed. Yes, an embryo is not &quot;living on its own&quot; and is not self-sufficient/self-caring. Yes, it is not breathing, eating, talking, moving on its own, but the embryo is still living no matter what.

On another note, pregnancy could be considered a virus because a virus in parasitic, but a virus is intended to shorten life and intended to cause damage to any living being. Viruses live off of your body, growing to a more intense strength and try to take you over. Yes, a developing embryo is parasitic upon the hosting mother body. However, we understand that pregnancy is our way of reproduction, so parasitic definition is completely invalid and </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-abortion-be-legal-no-strings-attached/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2008-01-25T17:00:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
