<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: thinkingduck's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=thinkingduck</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-23T22:36:17-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-23T22:36:17-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>The United States government commits acts of terrorism</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-United-States-government-commits-acts-of-terrorism/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) A lot of people believe that the United States is a sponsor or itself perpetrates terrorism. They cite various actions or atrocities carried out by the United States military, the CIA, or allied entities. I do not believe the United States can be characterized as a terrorist state.

This topic is potentially very sticky, since people hold ambiguous definitions and feelings about terrorism. I stand by the definition that terrorism is a violent act intentionally inflicted against innocent civilians for the purpose of swaying a third party, usually a government, to change its behavior. The use of violence in itself doesn't define terrorism, nor do the goals of the assailant matter. The actions of the target government that might inspire a terrorist act aren't a concern either. The key point to defining terrorism is that violence is used against innocents in order to sway the actions of a third, responsible party. This is particularly onerous to those who want to</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-United-States-government-commits-acts-of-terrorism/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2008-01-02T19:53:24-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
