<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Custom RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;new=true</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T02:54:34-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-18T02:54:34-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Decriminalize Rape</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Decriminalize-Rape/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Rape is a crime only because we think of it as a crime.

We need to critically examine to evaluate the current illegal status of rape. The current majority view that rape is bad or immoral has no basis except that it is an empty mindlessness forced on the people. The gratuitous notion is so negative in that it oppresses people's human sexual passion, sexual freedom and diversity in sexual conducts in human society. I argue that the current contemptuous status of rape must be reexamined and reevaluate, so that a progressive and liberated decriminalization of rape will be achieved for the betterment of society.

1. Rape is passion.
He wants to bang her, but she doesn't want to. Inevitably, a clash of interest between the two ensues. The attempt to rape meets resistance from the opponent. Should we give up raping? 
My answer is &quot;No.&quot; It is not just about getting laid or not, but is about how to react when confronted with strong opposition in the course of re</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Decriminalize-Rape/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T07:06:42-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agnosticism Presupposes That God Does Not Exist</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Agnosticism-Presupposes-That-God-Does-Not-Exist/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div class=&quot;header&quot;&gt;In this debate, I will argue that Agnosticism presupposes that God does not exist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;ag&amp;middot;nos&amp;middot;tic&lt;span class=&quot;pronset&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;show_spellpr&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;prondelim&quot;&gt;[&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;pron&quot;&gt;ag-&lt;span class=&quot;boldface&quot;&gt;nos&lt;/span&gt;-tik&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;prondelim&quot;&gt;]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;questionmark&quot; href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;body&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;pbk&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;pg&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;noun&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;luna-Ent&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;dnindex&quot;&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nature&quot;&gt;nature&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;of things are unknown and unknowable&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;dndata&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By &quot;God&quot;, I mean the tri-omni God (omnipotent, omniscience, and omnibenevolent)&lt;br </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Agnosticism-Presupposes-That-God-Does-Not-Exist/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T02:48:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>GWL_CPA Cannot See Why Kids Love the Taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/GWL-CPA-Cannot-See-Why-Kids-Love-the-Taste-of-Cinnamon-Toast-Crunch/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Allow me to introduce you to GWL_CPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;height: 150px; width: 200px;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;../photos/albums/1/3/2328/68462-2328-ya9fb-a.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;../GWL-CPA/&quot;&gt;http://www.debate.org/GWL-CPA/]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As you can see, he is a dog.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And, according to his profile, he is a &lt;em&gt;64 year-old &lt;/em&gt;dog.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A canine specimen of that age, along with colorblindness and nearsightedness, would most likely me unable to see decent political views, let alone why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, this is the cereal in question:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;height: 440px; width: 300px;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;../photos/albums/1/3/2328/68462-2328-7pmwn-a.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's very popular among children, obviously, because of the cinnamon swirls in every bite. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But t</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/GWL-CPA-Cannot-See-Why-Kids-Love-the-Taste-of-Cinnamon-Toast-Crunch/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T18:53:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Biblical God and the God of the Qu'ran are not the same!</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Biblical-God-and-the-God-of-the-Quran-are-not-the-same/2/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'andale mono', times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;I would like to thank Fruitytree for deciding to debate this topic with me. We will be debating whether or not the God of the Bible is the same God of the Qu'ran. Anyone who accepts this without permission will automatically forfeit the debate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'andale mono', times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Since this is the first round, it should only be used for acceptance. I think I will establish some rules, definitions, and round structure. If Fruitytree has any issues on rules, definitions, and structure, I have set, then she may post in the comment section to determine the changes and then Fruitytree may add those changes in her first round or I will change my structure here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: large;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'andale mono', times;&quot;&gt;The Biblical God and the</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Biblical-God-and-the-God-of-the-Quran-are-not-the-same/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-16T17:07:56-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Haiku Battle</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Haiku-Battle/7/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) For this debate it does not matter whether you are con or pro. All that matters is who can write the best Haiku. 

Haiku- a major form of Japanese verse, written in 17 syllables divided into 3 lines of 5, 7, and 5 syllables, and employing highly evocative allusions and comparisons, often on the subject of nature or one of the seasons. 

This debate will be 5 rounds. Since a Haiku is focused on seasons this is how the debate will be broken down to.

Haiku must be original from writer no plagiary. 

Round 1- acceptance
Round 2- Haiku about Summer
Round 3- Haiku about Fall
Round 4- Haiku about Winter
Round 5- Haiku about Spring 

The voter will have to choose based on how well did the writer write about the season. If the writer was able to follow the 
5 syllables
7 syllables
5 Syllables 
three line format.

May the best Haiku win.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Haiku-Battle/7/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-16T13:01:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should Uniforms be Mandatory in middle school?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Uniforms-be-Mandatory-in-middle-school/1/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) Uniforms should now and always be mandatory in middle school for multiple reasons. It has its slight drawbacks people may claim, such as restraint and control of clothing. However, the benefits for students, parents and staff outweigh the minuscule issues. There are multiple benefits regarding, behavior, prevention of segregation and bully protection. Also, daily benefits regarding simple economy, school&quot;s moral and mental strength. These benefits are what people may take for granted; but in reality, not everyone is able to have such support. Many people in this country face bullying, or are facing depression. Uniforms can help protect them and would bring a school closer together as one community. Learn about the truth and the benefits that uniforms have. One of the many factors is as follows: Many believe that uniforms can reduce segregation by many factors. Some may see that in the school community, people tend to make friends on factors regarding physical c</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Uniforms-be-Mandatory-in-middle-school/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T22:43:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The story of Noah's Ark is factual.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-story-of-Noahs-Ark-is-factual./1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;Round 1 is acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;Rules:&lt;br /&gt;Use sources.&lt;br /&gt;Wikipedia is not, I repeat, not a source.&lt;br /&gt;Use spell-check&lt;br /&gt;Try to use good grammar&lt;br /&gt;Stay civil&lt;br /&gt;No insults&lt;br /&gt;No *shudder*emoticons&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-story-of-Noahs-Ark-is-factual./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T16:21:24-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>To violent video games contribute to violence in our youth?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/To-violent-video-games-contribute-to-violence-in-our-youth/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Welcome;
Today I would like to debate a subject that has become very controversial in today's modern society: Violent Video Games.
With all the violence and tragedies in today's society, many look for answers and solutions, such as what to blame for all of this violence, and many turn to violent video games.
Now, I am no extreme &quot;gamer&quot; but I do own an Xbox 360 gaming console and do enjoy playing video games that are what most would say to be violent, such as the first person shooter series &quot;Call Of Duty&quot; and &quot;Halo&quot;
I am not here to argue the outlaw of these games, or increase restrictions, I'm only here to debate about if they do in fact cause an increase in violence in today's youth.
The only thing I ask is that my opponent uses the first round for acceptance to keep this debate even because I will not post an argument this round.
Thanks, and good luck to my soon-to-be opponent!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/To-violent-video-games-contribute-to-violence-in-our-youth/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T10:56:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Evolution v. Creation</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Evolution-v.-Creation/2/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) &lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;I HAVE MADE THIS DEBATE IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCEPT. IF YOU WANT TO DEBATE THIS, POST IN COMMENTS.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;round-inner&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolved&lt;/strong&gt;: Scientific evidence strongly supports the Theory of Evolution by common descent over the &quot;theory&quot; of Creationism. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitions&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new roman', times; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;No semantics please. These are the definitions that will be used throughout this debate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'times new r</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Evolution-v.-Creation/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-15T20:01:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>There is no such thing as justice in any society</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-is-no-such-thing-as-justice-in-any-society/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) There is no such thing is justice in any society</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-is-no-such-thing-as-justice-in-any-society/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-16T21:58:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Same-Sex Marriage Will Lead to Marriage Involving Animals, Siblings, or Children</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Same-Sex-Marriage-Will-Lead-to-Marriage-Involving-Animals-Siblings-or-Children/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) My opponent and I will be arguing one of the historic anti-gay marriage debates. The statement is that the allowance of gay marriage can serve as a &quot;gateway&quot; for the allowance of other types of relationships which go against the societal &quot;norm&quot;, including animals, children, siblings, corpses, etc, etc. &quot;Marriage&quot; in this debate is defined as a legal and binding relationship recognized by United States government. No semantics arguments.

First round is solely acceptance.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Same-Sex-Marriage-Will-Lead-to-Marriage-Involving-Animals-Siblings-or-Children/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-16T19:45:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Freedom is more important than Security.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Freedom-is-more-important-than-Security./1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) This is part of DDO Basic Tournament, number 2.

Resolved: Freedom is more important than Security.

I am Con.

Sorry for the delay but we had a hard time agreeing on a topic.

BOP on the affirmative.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Freedom-is-more-important-than-Security./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T02:31:55-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sam Harris' 'The Moral Landscape'</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Sam-Harris-The-Moral-Landscape/2/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Ave.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Topic: Sam Harris's 'The Moral Landscape'&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium; font-family: times new roman,times;&quot;&gt;'&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Position: Con/Against&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Category: Philosophy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Rounds: 4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Voting Period: 2 Weeks&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Time to Argue: 48 Hours&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: medium;&quot;&gt;Argument Max: 8,000 Characters&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Sam-Harris-The-Moral-Landscape/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T02:09:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ban Pornography and Nude entertainment</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Ban-Pornography-and-Nude-entertainment/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Pornography is unacceptable and should be illegal! Pornography is wrong and disgust! Nude entertainment is terrible, too! And besides, pornography can lead to becoming a pervert or even a rapist! Does society and the government actually accept this?!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Ban-Pornography-and-Nude-entertainment/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T00:58:45-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is Roman Catholicism biblical?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-Roman-Catholicism-biblical/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;I am Con, meaning that I say no to the question. The Pro will be arguing that Roman Catholicism is biblical.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Rules:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;strong&gt;First round is for acceptance.&lt;/strong&gt; If you provide an argument on the first round, then you may lose points. &lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;strong&gt;Be respectful.&lt;/strong&gt; No profanity or trolling.&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;strong&gt;You must be a Catholic.&lt;/strong&gt; I am not looking for people wanting to play the devil's advocate.&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;strong&gt;I have made this debate impossible to accept&lt;/strong&gt;. If you find a way to accept this debate, then you forfeit all seven points. If you are interested, then let me know by adding a comment.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-Roman-Catholicism-biblical/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T00:27:34-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Bible cannot be &quot;God's Word&quot; due to this:</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Bible-cannot-be-Gods-Word-due-to-this/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Note: This is my second attempt to have this debate. The person who accepted the debate before had no intentions of debating the issue at all. Please do not bother to accept if you do not understand the premise and agree to debate based on this premise: 

This debate is not about the existence of a higher being or what religion is true. It is only a debate on whether or not the Bible is the word of God. I contend that it is not so I am pro for it &quot;not being the word of God&quot; and I am going to focus on one subject about it. 

I would like to say that the Bible has so many problems in it and the God that is represented in it is so evil, you would really not want him as your next door neighbor, much less the object of your eternal affection but will focus on one issue.

1. The Old Testament (OT) God gave laws to mankind that were a code of morality but he himself broke them as in murdering scores of innocent people and punishing children for the sins of their</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Bible-cannot-be-Gods-Word-due-to-this/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T00:23:14-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Violent video games being banned</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Violent-video-games-being-banned/2/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Hello everyone I am going to argue why violent video games should not be banned. I have done much research on this topic and I will present sources as proof for what I say.

Reason #1: They do not make people violent.
After a shooting (like the one in Newtown) many people like to blame video games for the shooting. Many people think that video games cause violence. But here I am going to use logic. The USA is not the only country that has video games. Many other countries such as The UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, etc, spend just as much or more on video games (per capita) than the USA. So if video games make people violent, then these countries would be as or more violent than the USA. But the countries I listed earlier have rather low gun violence. Other countries spend more than the USA on video games, but they are safer than the USA. Another fact to point out, many people think video games sales are going up and so is violence. Video game sales ARE going </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Violent-video-games-being-banned/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T00:13:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How do you know god exsists?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/How-do-you-know-god-exsists/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hey there, i was just having a conversation with my friend and starting wondering, how do you know there is such thing as a man called &quot;God&quot; who walked on this earth? excuse me an entity? i mean there is no proven fact there is such thing, people beleive in the Book, people beleive in what other people are saying. its like saying, &quot;hey look, that guy just died. you cant see him but he did&quot; and your all like yeah i beleive that. if god exsisted then why would he put us through this, why would he give us different choices into what to beleive? if he was real why wouldn't he revel himself? why wouldnt he let his creations know he was alive? its just confusing, why would he give people this impretion of himself. this just shows to me and no offence intended people, but why is he hiding like a coward?. any answer?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/How-do-you-know-god-exsists/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T23:17:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brains is better than beauty</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Brains-is-better-than-beauty/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) I say that brains is better than beauty

RULES:
1) No swearing or cursing</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Brains-is-better-than-beauty/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T23:13:02-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michael Jordan is the greatest player of all time</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Michael-Jordan-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Michael Jordan is the greatest NBA player of all time. To make the debate simple, pick one player to compare to Michael Jordan.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Michael-Jordan-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T21:58:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
