<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Debates in the Post Voting Period</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;post=true</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-18T22:43:59-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-18T22:43:59-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>My Life Sucks More Than My Opponent's</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/My-Life-Sucks-More-Than-My-Opponents/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;My motion is that I, MassiveDump, have a suckier life than he, jdog2016.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telling the truth is not required.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am providing round one to be for jdog to accept this challenge, and arguments will begin in round two.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If anybody cares... probably not...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/My-Life-Sucks-More-Than-My-Opponents/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-25T11:21:39-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No One Has Ever Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to Do Look More Like</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/No-One-Has-Ever-Been-Far-Even-as-Decided-to-Use-Even-Go-Want-to-Do-Look-More-Like/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;For the longest, people have decided to for believe that someone has been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. But I has find this statement are irrelevant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let's take for a closer at then this and am decide for yourself:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;1. I Can't Even Science&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;You've gotta be kidding me. I try to went as far even once, as had my friends all go. Logically, can't I go even decide to go want do look more like, how anyone would? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Science proves no one has gone can for are to rock decide jump thus to from a jetpack. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dafk.net/what/&quot;&gt;http://www.dafk.net/what/&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If scientists can't decide whether destroy for look even, did he? No. I'm common sense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Economic For To Behave&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;If the economy depends are for lift quickly, then where are we expect one going far even as to decide not to eat bank</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/No-One-Has-Ever-Been-Far-Even-as-Decided-to-Use-Even-Go-Want-to-Do-Look-More-Like/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-29T15:43:24-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prostitution should be legalized</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Prostitution-should-be-legalized/7/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This is the first debate that I posted.&amp;nbsp; I am new to this side but looking forward to debating this topic.&amp;nbsp; As shown above, I am arguing in favor of legalizing prostitution.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Just for you information, I am not used to this debating format and so I will almost inevetibely make some sort of mistake.&amp;nbsp; I do know how to make a point however and so don't expect the debate to be a pushover.&amp;nbsp; Finally, have fun.&amp;nbsp; This is a serious topic but some light-heartedness goes a long way.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Good Luck.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Prostitution-should-be-legalized/7/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-10T11:24:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who would win in a fight, t-rex or batman?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Who-would-win-in-a-fight-t-rex-or-batman/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Batman is the obvious choice to win in this cage match. Batman has countless numbers of different skills and tools that will help to overcome the challenge of the t-Rex. Batman can protect a whole city, a t-Rex is not that big of an obstacle compared to bane for example. Batman will always prevail in this battle!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Who-would-win-in-a-fight-t-rex-or-batman/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-14T08:44:04-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Individualism is societally destructive</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Individualism-is-societally-destructive/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I've made this impossible for anyone to accept, if anyone wants to debate this comment or PM me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Individualism is defined by Merriam Webster as: &quot;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;a doctrine that the interests of the individual&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; are or ought to be ethically paramount&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Destruction is synonymous with ruinous. My advocacy will essentially be that the individualism that has sweeped the world, particularly the West, since the enlightenment is responsible for many of society's current ills, along with showing sociologically the inevitable effects of such an individualistic state of mind.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No semantics, I have no interest arguing over what societally destructive means. If my opponent tries to make this an issue, they forfeit the debate. First round is for acceptance and no new arguments in the last round. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Individualism-is-societally-destructive/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-04T14:14:09-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Big Bang Theory Is True</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Big-Bang-Theory-Is-True/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I'm doing this for a lot of reasons - Commitment, learning, and most importantly, the weekly stupid.

The Big Bang Theory - &quot;A cosmological theory holding that the universe originated approximately 20 billion years ago from the violent explosion of a very small agglomeration of matter of extremely high density and temperature.&quot;[1]

First round for acceptance, and please don't forfeit. 

Sources

[1]: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/big+bang+theory</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Big-Bang-Theory-Is-True/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-04T19:42:01-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Most Things Are Preferable to a Sharp Stick in the Eye</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Most-Things-Are-Preferable-to-a-Sharp-Stick-in-the-Eye/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Resolution:

&quot;Most Things Are Preferable to a Sharp Stick in the Eye&quot;

The debate will be done in rhyming poetry format, and judged based on arguments and the structuring of those arguments. Both substance and style should be considered when voting.

First round is acceptance.

I'd like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate.

Good luck.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Most-Things-Are-Preferable-to-a-Sharp-Stick-in-the-Eye/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-29T21:32:07-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should unicorns be able to farm?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-unicorns-be-able-to-farm/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is an acceptance round. Should unicorns be able to farm? yes they should


the rules: must be completely based on what you know about unicorns</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-unicorns-be-able-to-farm/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-29T21:10:40-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Only cool animals should be protected under the endangered species act.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Only-cool-animals-should-be-protected-under-the-endangered-species-act./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is a Round 1 debate of Subutai's tournament with the theme of it being the environment. For clarification, this challenge was sent specifically to imabench.

I will give imabench the option to either use the first round for acceptance or to start his arguments there.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Only-cool-animals-should-be-protected-under-the-endangered-species-act./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-07T03:03:59-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage should stay legal</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-should-stay-legal/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) People should just accept gay marriage because 1. it's not their business 2. it's not their choice and 3. People can be who ever they want to be.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-should-stay-legal/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-08T17:13:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Americans with Disabilities Act should be repealed</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Americans-with-Disabilities-Act-should-be-repealed/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;This debate is about the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ADA], including changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-325). The full text of the various versions of the law are linked from the ADA's government site. [1. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm]&quot;&gt;http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm]&lt;/a&gt; Wikipedia summarizes the law:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The ADA is a wide-ranging &lt;a class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Civil rights&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights&quot;&gt;civil rights&lt;/a&gt; law that prohibits, under certain circumstances, &lt;a title=&quot;Discrimination&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination&quot;&gt;discrimination&lt;/a&gt; based on &lt;a title=&quot;Disability&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability&quot;&gt;disability&lt;/a&gt;. It affords similar protections against discrimination to &lt;a title=&quot;Americans with disabili</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Americans-with-Disabilities-Act-should-be-repealed/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-26T18:34:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>You can never teach a llama to drive</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/You-can-never-teach-a-llama-to-drive/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This troll debate is on whether or not you can teach a llama to drive. Rules:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. First round is acceptance; everything else is fair game&lt;br /&gt;2. No forfeiting&lt;br /&gt;3. Forfeiture results in a loss for the side that forfeited&lt;br /&gt;4. This is a troll debate, so it is supposed to be funny; it is OK to not tell the truth&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/You-can-never-teach-a-llama-to-drive/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-13T22:32:38-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>My life is the worst you can live</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/My-life-is-the-worst-you-can-live/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I have the worst life history can say is in it</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/My-life-is-the-worst-you-can-live/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-13T20:12:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>That we should pay people to donate blood</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/That-we-should-pay-people-to-donate-blood/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Thanks Yraelz for agreeing to debate this topic with me.

My model in this debate is simple. People who give their blood to registered blood-banks in order to help save those in need ought to be given some kind of recompense, notwithstanding reasonable restrictions that for the most part already exist in blood-banks (ie you have to be a certain age, you can't give blood too often, you can't have deadly blood-diseases etc). This incentive would be funded via the blood-bank themselves, who are typically funded by some combination of government or user-pays. Blood types in high demand could command greater income.

Now that you know where I stand in the debate and what we're arguing over, I can't wait to get started.

First round for acceptance. 72 hours per round. 8000 chars. 1 week voting.

Good luck!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/That-we-should-pay-people-to-donate-blood/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-10T16:27:49-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In The Hunger Games , I, Noprisu, Would Win If Skrone was my only opponent.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-The-Hunger-Games-I-Noprisu-Would-Win-If-Skrone-was-my-only-opponent./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;In this debate, I will argue my superiority in the skills required to survive and win the hunger games if, and only if, my opponent was only Skrone, a fellow DDO member. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rules are as follows: &lt;br /&gt;1. No false information&lt;br /&gt;2. 4 Rounds, 1st is for acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;3. We will use the 1st Arena used in the Hunger Games novels as the setting if the question arises. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look forward to this Debate&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/In-The-Hunger-Games-I-Noprisu-Would-Win-If-Skrone-was-my-only-opponent./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-10T10:22:59-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Eugenics: Right or Wrong?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Eugenics-Right-or-Wrong/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) My Argument:

Eugenics- the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).

Eugenics is an immoral practice that should be banned in all countries. Even though the practice does not present itself a daily it is still being practiced and abused for the benefit others in other countries including India, China, and United States. 

I feel that subjecting some to eugenics because of their negative or undesirable traits is wrong. Who are you to say that someone's traits are undesirable. 

Undesirable - Not wanted or desirable because harmful, objectionable, or unpleasant: &quot;the drug's undesirable side effects&quot;.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Eugenics-Right-or-Wrong/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-04T02:59:22-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Most Reliable Basis For Determining Morality Is Via Secular Means</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Most-Reliable-Basis-For-Determining-Morality-Is-Via-Secular-Means/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I would like to start my time here at DDO with a subject that is very close to my heart, the nature of where we derive our morality from. In my view, it is via secularist means. I am issuing this as an open challenge to anyone with interest in arguing from a different position. Before we begin, I would like to clarify the terms, namely that:

Morality - What we consider to be right or wrong

Secularism - actions and thinking that are derived from a non-religious standpoint.

Whoever decides to take up the role of &quot;Con&quot; in this debate, Pro requests of Con that that the debate follow this format:

Round 1 - Acceptance, as well as Con briefly clarifying their position, as well as, if they deem it necessary, adding any further definitions to other terms Con may wish to include within the debate as part of their arguments.

Round 2 - Opening arguments with no clash

Rounds 3 and 4 - Clash

Round 5 - Clash and Conclusion

The Burden of Proof is shared</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Most-Reliable-Basis-For-Determining-Morality-Is-Via-Secular-Means/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-17T09:36:30-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Would some trumpet players' trumpets be better for hats?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Would-some-trumpet-players-trumpets-be-better-for-hats/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is arguing that some trumpets in our band would be better off using their trumpets as hats instead of playing them.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Would-some-trumpet-players-trumpets-be-better-for-hats/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-05T16:18:34-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don't you think the Boston Bombing was over hyped?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dont-you-think-the-Boston-Bombing-was-over-hyped/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First of all, I understand and acknowledge that the Boston bombing was a terrible event which never should have occurred. But don't you ever stop and think that a big deal is being made out of something substantially smaller? People were even thinking this could be compared to 9/11.

On the same day 42 people die in an earthquake in Iraq. But does that receive even a tenth of what the Boston bombings received. No.

This can't be defended.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dont-you-think-the-Boston-Bombing-was-over-hyped/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-28T16:40:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage is Morally wrong and should not be Legalized</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-is-Morally-wrong-and-should-not-be-Legalized/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The topic at hand is that we should not legalize gay marriage. (1) traditional Marriage in its sense, is defined as a bonding between one man and one woman. Not marrying in the same-sex. (2) Same-Sex marriage is morally wrong.

(1) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com 

round 1 counts as accepting the argument and making your opening statements</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-is-Morally-wrong-and-should-not-be-Legalized/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-24T11:39:42-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
