<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Debates in the Voting Period</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=2&amp;sort=1&amp;voting=true</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-22T03:34:16-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T03:34:16-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Spider man is better than Superman</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Spider-man-is-better-than-Superman/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Spider man is bad a ss. Superman is a strait up PUSSS SSSSYYYYY. Id like to see that muh fu ckah step to the web head. hed steady get a mud hole stomped in his as s. real talk though that underwear over the pants wearin b itch aint got nothing on spiderman. Plus my nigga spiderman be gettin that mj p ussy. what is superman gettin? batmans d ick. try and argue with me bitc hessssss</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Spider-man-is-better-than-Superman/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T20:35:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Round 1 being acceptance.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Round-1-being-acceptance./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Round 1 is acceptance.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Round-1-being-acceptance./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T17:32:55-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Adolf-Hitler/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Adolf Hitler was not the most evil German in History.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Adolf-Hitler/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T17:38:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>British Teachers Often Don't Afford Students The Credit Of Intelligence</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/British-Teachers-Often-Dont-Afford-Students-The-Credit-Of-Intelligence/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', times;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am a 13 year-old with a rather uncommon disorder named Aspergers Syndrome, this means that I am able to challenge the modern psyche of children are inferior to adults, which some people take for granted and have never thought to challenge. Essentially, even when it isn't a smart thing to do, my brain makes me say things to teachers which I regret later. I first truly realised the extent of teachers disrespect for their pupils on the 21st of may at 2 o'clock. I had recived a detention based on the school's new &quot;double removal system&quot; which has evidently been set up to punish repeat offenders who have given up on school and think there is nothing left in education. I had recieved the detention for not having my homework diary signed. I immediatelly thought that this was unfair, on the whole, I behave impeccably towards my betters and I didn't see why I s</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/British-Teachers-Often-Dont-Afford-Students-The-Credit-Of-Intelligence/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T21:57:33-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should the U.S. Government be able to sell weapons to other countries?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-the-U.S.-Government-be-able-to-sell-weapons-to-other-countries/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I believe that we need to allow the gov. to sell weapons because if we dont sell them then other countries will just buy from someone else. Plus it helps our economy to gain that kind of money.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-the-U.S.-Government-be-able-to-sell-weapons-to-other-countries/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T13:14:58-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Selena Gomez is and ugly bitch, right?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Selena-Gomez-is-and-ugly-bitch-right/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Yes, Selena Gomez is and ugly bitch! I used to find her sexy and she used to be the woman of my dreams, until I saw Debby Ryan!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Selena-Gomez-is-and-ugly-bitch-right/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T12:36:02-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mac is better then PC</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-better-then-PC/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Mac is way better then PC for tons of reasons and I have few of them

First mac is way faster then PC so you dont need to delete anything to make it faster
Second it is faster to play games on it and even if there are games that you can &quot;only&quot; play on windows there is stuff to play it on mac
Third windows sucks</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-better-then-PC/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T15:32:52-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I know more about debate.org than you.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-know-more-about-debate.org-than-you./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I know more than you. Agreed?&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-know-more-about-debate.org-than-you./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-20T20:19:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trotskyism VS Capitalism</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Trotskyism-VS-Capitalism/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) That a Trotskyist Society would show to be an overall better form of Government than a Capitalistic Society.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Trotskyism-VS-Capitalism/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T18:51:31-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wrestling being eliminated from the 2020 Olympic Games</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Wrestling-being-eliminated-from-the-2020-Olympic-Games/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) First of all wrestling is one of the oldest Olympic sports and that alone should be a good enough reason to keep it. When wrestling was chosen to be one of the sports that may not be on the 2020 Olympic program the wrestling community came together to make sure our dreams stayed alive. Just recently we had the Rumble on the Rails which is a tri-meet between the United State, Iran, and Russia. It took place in Grand Central Station and had very many spectators. It was also broadcasted on television. We brought three countries together in hopes of keeping something we love dearly in the Olympics.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Wrestling-being-eliminated-from-the-2020-Olympic-Games/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T17:30:59-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>EPL is better than Primera Liga</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/EPL-is-better-than-Primera-Liga/2/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) First of all,
Constrating to Only REAL MADRID &amp; BARCELONA dominate Primera Liga,
in English Premier League there are no absolute dominacteur or dominee.
It means, there is potential and sustainable development in class of league

Second,
EPL's marketing ability is really better than Primera Liga,
Wherever We can pick up a remote controller, we can see any match of EPL!
but in case of Primera Liga, it doesn't .
and EPL's camera skill for shooting the match is absolutely dominant Primera Liga's

Don't you think about this?</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/EPL-is-better-than-Primera-Liga/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-20T11:41:38-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Color pencils are better than crayons</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Color-pencils-are-better-than-crayons/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I believe that color pencils are better than cartons therefor I am pro for them. Color pencils are better because they do not get your hands dirty easily. And I don't think people Like dirty hands.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Color-pencils-are-better-than-crayons/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T20:26:12-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>is Dann a tool or a moron?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/is-Dann-a-tool-or-a-moron/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Dann can learn, so he is a tool!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/is-Dann-a-tool-or-a-moron/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T12:18:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Science Refute God?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Does-Science-Refute-God/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) The advancements of modern science have rendered the concept of God superfluous. All phenomena we experience can in principle be explained with reference solely to materialistic or naturalistic causes. This makes it unnecessary to postulate a Creator if we conform to Occam's Razor. Another reason is that a Creator has no explanatory power. Because the Creator is the very kind of thing that requires an explanation.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Does-Science-Refute-God/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T11:34:52-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Marsellus Wallace look like a b*tch?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Does-Marsellus-Wallace-look-like-a-b-tch/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I'd like to put forth the notion that there is a possibility that &quot;Marsellus Wallace,&quot; a powerful mob boss in Los Angeles, looks like a b*tch.

Other definitions will be put up more for connotation as the argument calls for. Sources can come from anywhere, and no suggestions will be made.

I will be arguing that Marsellus Wallace does, indeed, look like a b*tch while my opponent will be arguing that, no, he doesn't.

First round is acceptance.
Second round will be arguments.
Third round will be rebuttal, but arguments may be made.
Final round will only be rebuttal.

&quot;What&quot; is not to be said in any round.

Lack of adherence to these rules will cause a n*gger hiding in a bowl of rice to pop a cap in the a*s of the violator.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Does-Marsellus-Wallace-look-like-a-b-tch/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T22:31:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is 69 and 420 funny??</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-69-and-420-funny/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) 69 is a sex position. 420 is a number that is code for smoking weed. both of thise things are pretty funny i thiink. sometimes i see these numbers as i go about my day and can't help but laught at them. but some people think that they aren't that funny?? please answer 

- austin</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-69-and-420-funny/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T03:53:53-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>It is morally permissible to have masturbated on 9/11 in between the towers going down</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/It-is-morally-permissible-to-have-masturbated-on-9-11-in-between-the-towers-going-down/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) The full resolution is: &quot;Resolved: It is morally permissible to have masturbated on 9/11 2001 in between the two towers falling to the ground&quot; 

Clarifications:

1 - It is a given that said person who is masturbating is an american citizen who is living in the US and is fully aware of everything that is going on because he is watching the events on TV.

2 - It is a given that said person chose to masturbate in the time period from when the South tower collapsed to when the North tower collapsed. 

Rules: 
3 rounds
8000 characters
Con MUST GIVE ARGUMENTS IN ROUND 1
Only pictures of 9/11 are permissible, nothing relating to genitals though.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/It-is-morally-permissible-to-have-masturbated-on-9-11-in-between-the-towers-going-down/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-20T17:38:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oregon's 'Death with Dignity' act should be legal among other states</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Oregons-Death-with-Dignity-act-should-be-legal-among-other-states/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) There will be 4 rounds, 3 followed by the acceptance.

Please avoid rambling on to make your points clear.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Oregons-Death-with-Dignity-act-should-be-legal-among-other-states/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T22:51:38-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Homeschooling is better than Public or Private School</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Homeschooling-is-better-than-Public-or-Private-School/3/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Now, I must say something up front, I will not be on this site from Monday till' Friday. So as odd as it sounds, a round will be forfeited by both sides to let me get back from being a State Page where I will not have regular internet access.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, here are the basic rules:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stay Civil&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Use Spell-Check (please)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Use sources/logic/experience to back up your claims and/or contentions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wikipedia is &lt;em&gt;not,&lt;/em&gt; I repeat, &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Experience should be a secondary, if not last, resort as support for a claim/contention. It should be used more as a way to give examples and illustrations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round 1 is acceptance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A round will be forfeited at no expense to either side (Must be the same round for both parties and AFTER round 1 and 2). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'Nuff said.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Homeschooling-is-better-than-Public-or-Private-School/3/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-20T21:56:58-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: that there are moral absolutes.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-that-there-are-moral-absolutes./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;I set out to prove that there are moral absolutes. I&quot;ll use &quot;moral&quot; and &quot;ethical&quot; synonymously, choosing one over the other as style dictates. By &quot;absolute,&quot; I mean something is that true in all possible worlds, necessarily true, and true in all situations. For example, the judgment &quot;lying is wrong&quot; is necessarily true and there is no circumstance when lying is right.&quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;My arguments are Kantian, so my opponent should be quite familiar with Kant's moral theory. I put no restrictions on the opponent, but be forewarned that I have a doctorate in philosophy, and I have taught for 25 years. I'm only trying to say that I have a good deal of practice and experience in this area.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Appeals to emotion and majority opinion are strongly discouraged, unless my opponent proves these have some value in proving the truth of his conclusions.&lt;/sp</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-that-there-are-moral-absolutes./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-19T16:34:21-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
