<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Entertainment Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=3&amp;sort=1&amp;category=Entertainment</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-19T09:46:03-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-19T09:46:03-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Vampire Diaries vs Twilight</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Vampire-Diaries-vs-Twilight/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) I believe that the Vampire diaries is better than twilight because just by watching the first episode you are captivated by it like you wanna continue watching it. But when I saw the twilight I was like what is this and it just didn't really captivate me unlike the TVD.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Vampire-Diaries-vs-Twilight/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-19T07:19:15-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Tenant was the best Doctor</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/David-Tenant-was-the-best-Doctor/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;b&gt;PLEASE NOTE:&lt;/b&gt; I have made this debate impossible to accept. If you have any queries or requests prior to accepting, LEAVE A COMMENT. If you are content with the rules as they stand and wish to debate this topic, PM ME if you meet the criteria, listed below.

&lt;b&gt;Criteria&lt;/b&gt;

1. You must be knowledgeable about Doctor Who.

2. You must have completed AT LEAST THREE serious* debates.

3. You must have won AT LEAST ONE of these debates.

*Casual, satirical or humourous debates will be assessed to see if they count as &quot;serious&quot; debates.

&lt;b&gt;Definitions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DAVID TENANT - Tenant's portrayal of the Tenth Doctor, 2006-'09, NOT the character of the Doctor himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BEST - In terms of acting ability.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DOCTOR - All eleven Doctors, EXCLUDING John Hurt's portrayal in the Series 7 finale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DOCTOR WHO - Both the classic series, running from 1963-'89, and the revived series, running from 2005-present.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rules&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;For</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/David-Tenant-was-the-best-Doctor/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-19T06:51:17-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Fantastic would beat Jake the Dog in a fight</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mr.-Fantastic-would-beat-Jake-the-Dog-in-a-fight/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) This is my 1st debate here on DDO so sorry if I mess up in some way.
Basically, I am arguing that Mr. Fantastic (Reed Richards) would beat Jake the Dog from Adventure Time in a fight.
Each person has a week to prepare for this fight and they will fight on an open field. There are no things such as rocks and other things on that terrain that could possibly help them. The only things that can help them are the objects they bring to the fight, it's one on one so they can't receive assistance from living things/other people such as Finn or the rest of the Fantastic 4.
It is considered beat when one of them can no longer fight back. 
1st round is acceptance
2nd round is opening/arguments
3rd round is rebuttals
4th round is rebuttals again/closing.
No new information can be said in the 4th round.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mr.-Fantastic-would-beat-Jake-the-Dog-in-a-fight/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T16:21:37-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Minecraft is awesome</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Minecraft-is-awesome/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) You can only do so much with mw3 until it gets repetitive. In minecraft theirs always more to explore and create. ts all about the concept of the game. As you can notice, Minecraft Graphic is neglected, the gameplay only is what counts. It has a unique creative gameplay with infinite possibilities. Surviving is such thing that makes it brilliant. Call of Duty lacks what we call a good concept, its a linear killing game in which you move from point A to B. Tell your &quot;crappy&quot; friend, the Concept is why his dear CoD was fucked when it came against Battlefield 3.
One of the complaints I DO hear though is that people don&quot;t know what to DO in Minecraft. Not that they don&quot;t understand how it works, but that they really don&quot;t have any ideas as to what to do like what to build and such. And, I&quot;ll admit, when I first played it I too had that problem. I didn&quot;t really understand the appeal at all, but I think if you just sit down with it for an afternoon and open your min</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Minecraft-is-awesome/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T16:06:07-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ban Pornography and Nude entertainment</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Ban-Pornography-and-Nude-entertainment/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Pornography is unacceptable and should be illegal! Pornography is wrong and disgust! Nude entertainment is terrible, too! And besides, pornography can lead to becoming a pervert or even a rapist! Does society and the government actually accept this?!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Ban-Pornography-and-Nude-entertainment/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-18T00:58:45-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Xbox One's downsides outweigh its benefits</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Xbox-Ones-downsides-outweigh-its-benefits/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) &lt;div&gt;The resolution of this debate is simple - the downsides of Xbox One outweight its benefits. I will be arguing affirmative. The rules are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Burden of proof is shared. Each side must prove their case.&lt;br /&gt;2. Forfeiture of any round by either side results in a victory for the other side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;3. First round is for &lt;strong&gt;acceptance&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;4. Round 2 is for &lt;strong&gt;opening arguments &lt;/strong&gt;only.&lt;br /&gt;5. Round 3 is a &lt;strong&gt;clash&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;round. You can &lt;strong&gt;only&lt;/strong&gt; rebut the arguments the opponent made in round 2, and&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;you may not introduce new arguments&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;6. Round 4 is for &lt;strong&gt;closing arguments&lt;/strong&gt;. You can rebut arguments made in round 3 and sum up your case.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Xbox-Ones-downsides-outweigh-its-benefits/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T20:31:24-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lost Is One of the Most Well Written T.V. Shows to Ever Grace Our Screens</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Lost-Is-One-of-the-Most-Well-Written-T.V.-Shows-to-Ever-Grace-Our-Screens/1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) The ABC series known as &quot;LOST&quot; was one of the most well written T.V. series to ever grace our screens. I will be honored to debate on this, I ask only that you have seen the show before.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Lost-Is-One-of-the-Most-Well-Written-T.V.-Shows-to-Ever-Grace-Our-Screens/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T15:54:01-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rap is the worst genre of music.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rap-is-the-worst-genre-of-music./1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) Definition of worst- Of the poorest quality or the lowest standard. 

I will take the pro position, while my opponent will take the con position, which is that rap is not the worst genre of music. First round will be acceptance only. 
</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rap-is-the-worst-genre-of-music./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T12:54:55-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yo mama jokes</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yo-mama-jokes/22/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) We will do ama jokes I go first.
Yo mama is so fat that she sat on a dollar and squeezed a booger out George Washington's nose.
Yo mama is so stupid that she got locked in a grocery store and starved!
Yo mama is old that she her birth certificate expired.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yo-mama-jokes/22/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T12:16:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If Abortion = Murder, then Masturbation = Genocide and B***jobs = Cannibalism</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/If-Abortion-Murder-then-Masturbation-Genocide-and-B-jobs-Cannibalism/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Tweaked the Resolution slightly due to a good comment in the comments section. 

Can now be accepted by anyone.

3 rounds, 4000 characters

First round acceptance only</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/If-Abortion-Murder-then-Masturbation-Genocide-and-B-jobs-Cannibalism/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-17T06:40:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Death penalty should be supported.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Death-penalty-should-be-supported./1/</link>
<description>(Debating Period) The United Nations in 2008 banned the use of the death penalty, however fifty-eight countries, including the United States and China, still exercise the death penalty. As such, the topic remains highly controversial. I believe that some criminals lost their human faces while they made chain of serious crimes and there's no other punishment for them but death penalty.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Death-penalty-should-be-supported./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-16T12:58:16-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Cybermen are the best villains in Doctor Who</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Cybermen-are-the-best-villains-in-Doctor-Who/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;b&gt;Definitions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CYBERMEN - The villains from Doctor Who, including the Mondasian and Pete's World Cybermen, in both the classic and revived series of Doctor Who&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BEST - Scariest, most awesome, most popular but NOT most iconic&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DOCTOR WHO - As specified before, both the classic series, running from 1963-'89, and the revived series, running from 2005-present&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rules&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;For Debaters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. PRO will be arguing that the Cybermen are the best Doctor Who villains in accordance with the definitions above. CON will be arguing that another race are the best Doctor Who villains. Specify which race you wish to argue for in Round 1.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. BoP is shared as both debaters are arguing for a different race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. The round format is as follows:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Round 1: Acceptance&lt;br&gt;Round 2: Arguments, no rebuttals&lt;br&gt;Round 3: Rebuttals&lt;br&gt;Round 4: Final rebuttals and closing statements, NO new arguments&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This cannot be change</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Cybermen-are-the-best-villains-in-Doctor-Who/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-15T12:04:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Cybermen would have won the Battle of Canary Wharf</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Cybermen-would-have-won-the-Battle-of-Canary-Wharf/1/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) &lt;b&gt;PLEASE NOTE:&lt;/b&gt; I have made this debate impossible to accept. If you have any queries or requests prior to accepting, LEAVE A COMMENT. If you are content with the rules as they stand and wish to debate this topic, PM ME if you meet the criteria, listed below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Full Resolution&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Cybermen would have won the Battle of Canary Wharf had the Genesis Ark not been opened.

For the purposes of this debate, the following alternative events will be considered as fact:

- The Genesis Ark was not opened.
- The Doctor never sucked the Cybermen and/or the Daleks into the Void.
- The battle continued until either side was destroyed or until one side was forced to surrender.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Criteria&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. You must be knowledgeable about Doctor Who.

2. You must have seen the episodes Army of Ghosts and Doomsday from Series 2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. You must have completed AT LEAST THREE serious* debates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. You must have won AT LEAST ONE of these d</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Cybermen-would-have-won-the-Battle-of-Canary-Wharf/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-14T16:36:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mama jokes</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) we will do mama jokes!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-14T10:46:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mama jokes</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) we will do mama jokes!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-14T10:46:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mama jokes</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/</link>
<description>(Challenge Period) we will do mama jokes!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mama-jokes/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-14T10:46:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Star Wars &gt; Star Trek</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Star-Wars-Star-Trek/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Star Wars &gt; Star Trek</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Star-Wars-Star-Trek/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-11T19:22:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chuck Norris Jokes</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Jokes/3/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Fun idea I got from Utahjoker. Each round you must tell a Chuck Norris joke.&lt;br /&gt;4 rounds &lt;br /&gt;500 character limit &lt;br /&gt;1st round acceptance only&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Jokes/3/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-11T14:46:38-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Ending to Sherlock was bad</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Ending-to-Sherlock-was-bad/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Good evening, Debate.org! This is my first debate on this site and I'm rather excited now to be honest. I had actually expected to launch myself straight into argument, but I feel I must first offer up my appreciation for the format, so prolific as it seems in general, and just for the order of it otherwise. I was just making argument on YouTube only moments ago and felt my efforts wasted... So, yes! Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And now onto what I want to debate. I am of the opinion that the ending to the TV mini-series 'Sherlock' is bad. And that's about it. My opponent will be arguing otherwise, that it is good, or at least not bad.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; bad - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/search?q=define+bad&amp;amp;oq=define+bad&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3j62l2.1303j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt;https://www.google.com/search?q=define+bad&amp;amp;oq=define+bad&amp;amp;aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3j62l2.1303j0&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;And that's the parameters for </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Ending-to-Sherlock-was-bad/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-11T12:44:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yo Mama Joke</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yo-Mama-Joke/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round is acceptance 
Each opponent will post one Yo Mama Joke per round
No profanity or dirty jokes
Best of Luck</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yo-Mama-Joke/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-11T01:51:40-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
