<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: News Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=4&amp;sort=0&amp;category=News</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-20T06:53:46-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-20T06:53:46-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Real estate experts</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Real-estate-experts/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;It is difficult for some of the people to make investments or dealing with the properties, because they don't have that much detail information about the real estate sector. So, Are people satisfied with the advices of the real estate experts? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.lacoteimmo.com/&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Real-estate-experts/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-11T17:39:48-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WW3 the Miner countries</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/WW3-the-Miner-countries/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This debate will be using Countries not know for there military power
1. acceptance and naming your 5 countries
2-4. WW5
5. summaries.
My countries are Ireland, Czech Rep., Brazil, Venezuela, and Vietnam.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/WW3-the-Miner-countries/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-06T07:53:30-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Banning Guns</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Banning-Guns/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Some people in this world believe we should ban guns from the streets and from honest people who don't use them to do harm. I saw this is a load of crap, i mean its not like banning guns is gonna make all the criminals give up there guns. And besides its not like they got them legally anyway. Taking away guns would just endanger more people because they wouldn't have a way to protect themselves and fight back.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Banning-Guns/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-03-21T21:44:41-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gun/bully control</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gun-bully-control/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The concept that Gun and bulling are out of control is outrages to take away guns is a violation of your rights and insult the VERY THING that built this country might as well as take away the military Knifes and tell them to use there hands. Bulling has been around to FOR CENTURIES DON'T FALL FOR MISLEADING THING yes its sad for people to shoot other kids and themselves but your not helping by PUTTING KIDS IN JAIL its like putting gays in jail ITS THERE WAY OF LIFE.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gun-bully-control/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-03-27T20:28:45-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The NCAA punishments for Penn State were too harsh</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-NCAA-punishments-for-Penn-State-were-too-harsh/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Hello everyone,
This is an arguement when the NCAA punished the Penn state coaches.

My arguement: They were unjust

Opponent's arguement: They were just or they wanted more.

Opponent will make the rules.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-NCAA-punishments-for-Penn-State-were-too-harsh/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-13T16:41:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hacktivism does more good than harm</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Hacktivism-does-more-good-than-harm/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) RESOLVED: Computer hacktivism does more good than harm.
Before I present our main arguments I'd like to provide a proper framework for today's debate.
DEFINITION: Hacktivism
First, it's crucial that I will define the most important term in today's topic, &quot;hacktivism.&quot; Hacktivism is a combination of the words &quot;hack&quot; and &quot;activism,&quot;
however, it is extremely important to remember that the word &quot;hacktivism&quot; is different in both meaning and spirit than the word &quot;hack/hacking.&quot; Voters,
please do not allow my opponent to trick you into believing that they mean the same thing. &quot;Hack/Hacking&quot; is defined by &quot;breaking into a computer
system&quot; according to IBM's Internet Security Systems. On the other hand, &quot;hacktivism&quot; is the act of &quot;a computer hacker whose activity is aimed at
promoting a social or political cause&quot; according to Oxford Dictionary. On that note, I'd like to warn my opponent in advance that any examples they
cite which do not fall under this proper d</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Hacktivism-does-more-good-than-harm/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-12-07T23:08:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should Euthanasia be Legalized?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Euthanasia-be-Legalized/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round is only to accept the debate.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Euthanasia-be-Legalized/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-29T20:09:48-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Essential Services Should be Allowed to Strike</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Essential-Services-Should-be-Allowed-to-Strike/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;R1 is acceptance.&amp;nbsp; R2 - 4 are arguments and conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Definitions:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Essential Services - a class of occupation that has limitations in regard to labour actions.&amp;nbsp; For this debate, essential services will be:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The polic sector&lt;br /&gt;The firefighting sector&lt;br /&gt;The hospital sector&lt;br /&gt;Water supply services&lt;br /&gt;Electricity supply services&lt;br /&gt;Armed forces&lt;br /&gt;Prison services&lt;br /&gt;Air traffic control services&lt;br /&gt;The telephone service&lt;br /&gt;Those providing food and cleaning schools for kids [1]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strike - a concerted stopping of work or&amp;nbsp;withdrawal of workers services as to compel an employer to acede to workers demands or in protest of terms or conditions imposed by the employer [2]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If my opponent wishes to add any services to this list, IT MUST BE POSTED IN R1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No semantics, no trolling, and no new arguments may be posted by my opponent in the final Round.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look for</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Essential-Services-Should-be-Allowed-to-Strike/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-30T11:11:09-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The U.S should send aid to forced child laborers in third world countries.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-U.S-should-send-aid-to-forced-child-laborers-in-third-world-countries./2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Resolution: The U.S should send aid to forced child laborers in third world countries.

Definitions:
child labor = children working regularly in unsafe environments usually with low pay. 
third world countries = developing nations.
aid = medical aid, schooling, and basic comforts of life such as: beds, clothes, and hygienic items.
forced = required.

Observations: 
The use of forced child labor in third world countries basically forces children to work in adult environments. If a limb is cut off then the child is fired without pay or medical care. 

Contention 1: Child labor demands a impossible quotas that children cannot reach and are thus deducted pay. This in turn demands children to work harder to exhaustion and strips them of morale. Many of these children live in slums with only the bare necessities while the factory owners live in a comfortable lifestyle. These owners are living at the cost of the children's sweat and effort. Many of these ch</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-U.S-should-send-aid-to-forced-child-laborers-in-third-world-countries./2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-08T16:14:33-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>U.S. Aid to Pakistan should be continued</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/U.S.-Aid-to-Pakistan-should-be-continued/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;The United States has provided more than $20 billion in aid to Pakistan in recent years. Recently a move was made in the Senate to terminate aid, but the cut off was blocked. [1. &lt;a href=&quot;http://india.nydailynews.com/newsarticle/4fdb7ceab1e35d0936000001/bid-to-cut-off-us-aid-to-pakistan-blocked-by-harry-reid]&quot;&gt;http://india.nydailynews.com/newsarticle/4fdb7ceab1e35d0936000001/bid-to-cut-off-us-aid-to-pakistan-blocked-by-harry-reid]&lt;/a&gt; It's an issue that cuts across Party lines, with prominent Republicans and prominent Democrats on both sides.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The resolution for this debate is that aid should not be terminated in the near future unless entirely new and unforeseen events occur. Some reduction of aid is permitted within the scope of the resolution, but not a complete termination nor a reduction to significant as to amount to a cut off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This debate is part of the second round of MIG's Tournament. My opponent and I are in agreement on 80% </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/U.S.-Aid-to-Pakistan-should-be-continued/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-01T18:03:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Wall Street Protests Are Justified</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Wall-Street-Protests-Are-Justified/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Round 1 will only be for acceptance. Round 2 will start the actual debate. Since it is a current event, it should be very interesting to examine it. Thank you!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Wall-Street-Protests-Are-Justified/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-10-30T21:30:24-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Am I Christine O'Donnell?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Am-I-Christine-ODonnell/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;During the 2010 U.S. Senate special election in Delaware, Christian O&amp;rsquo;Donnell released this hypnotically mesmerizing video: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxJyPsmEask&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Christine O&amp;rsquo;Donnell claims to be you. She claims that she is you indefinitely. She was taking to an open audience, addressing the entire population. She was talking to all of us. The referents are us. In this, she claims to be us and thus she claims to be me. But if she is me, then who am I? I most certainly know who I am. I am me. But if she is me, than she is I and I am her. But if she is me, then am I (that is, do I exist)? Is she me, am I replaced? Did her witchcraft replace my identity? My existence? But then where did I go? If she is me, then am I really nothing? But she claims to be me. I will argue that I am not Christine O&amp;rsquo; Donnell&amp;hellip;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Indeed, I am most certain that I am something, and that I know in this. In respect of these tr</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Am-I-Christine-ODonnell/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-05-24T19:42:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WW3 miner countries round 2</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/WW3-miner-countries-round-2/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This is a continueation of the last round.&lt;br /&gt;during the first round my opponent will state the senario.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/WW3-miner-countries-round-2/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-09T14:33:32-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should face the death penalty</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-should-face-the-death-penalty/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Rules are as follows

You must take the pro stance for why he should face the death penalty

4 rounds total

4,000 character limit

Keep it clean, organized, and list at least one source that isnt wikipedia.

Have fun. First round is for acceptance</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-should-face-the-death-penalty/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-14T12:50:06-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>You suck</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/You-suck/4/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) You are a seal</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/You-suck/4/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-04T00:41:31-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gay marrage</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-marrage/5/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I am ashamed at people WHY? why can't gays get married huh and don't give me the whole Its against Religion because THERE IS NO PROOF HE/SHE IS REAL</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-marrage/5/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-03-27T23:28:12-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>was it right for beyonce to lip sync the inaguration?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/was-it-right-for-beyonce-to-lip-sync-the-inaguration/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I do not think it was right for her to lip sync because it the inauguration and you were invited to sing which she didn't.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/was-it-right-for-beyonce-to-lip-sync-the-inaguration/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-02-03T19:14:38-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George Zimmerman is innocent</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/George-Zimmerman-is-innocent/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) New evidence in the George Zimmerman case has been reluctantly revealed by ABC News, which clearly shows the back of the George Zimmerman's head bleeding profusely. Consistent with his claim that Trayvon Martin was bashing his head into the concrete, resulting in Zimmerman shooting the teen to death in self defense.

George Zimmerman's bleeding head -- consistent with his self defense claim
Disgustingly, the Liberal talking heads &#8212; even after seeing this evidence &#8212; try to spin it to appear that maybe&#8230;just maybe&#8230;Zimmerman started the fight (without landing a single blow, according to Martin's funeral home director), but then got his but whipped, and only then pulled out his gun. What a bunch of moral cowards &#8212; also known as typical liberals.

Remember, Zimmerman claimed that Martin confronted him, punched him in the face, knocking him to the ground, and then jumped onto of him and began pounding his head into the concrete.

Remember how the Leftist Media </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/George-Zimmerman-is-innocent/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-06-06T18:21:41-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Campus Concealed Carry</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/On-Campus-Concealed-Carry/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is a redo of a debate which wasn't finished due to schedule conflicts. I apologize for having waited too long to reissue the debate but I haven't had access to my laptop. As agreed we will be copying and pasting our previous arguments until we come to the new round. I once again wish my opponent luck!</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/On-Campus-Concealed-Carry/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-15T07:31:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Canada should help Libya before helping their own country first?!</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Canada-should-help-Libya-before-helping-their-own-country-first/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) In my opinion, Canada should help their own country first. They should help their country as quick as they can so then after that they could help Libya. I'm not saying that Canada should not help other countries although, if Canada has millions of dollars to send planes to Libya, can't they use some of that money to feed the hungry people that we have in Canada? Many people go home and not having anything to eat that night, the next night and/or the whole week! Although Libya is in danger as we speak, isn't starvation and other problems also as important to us Canadians?</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Canada-should-help-Libya-before-helping-their-own-country-first/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-03-28T23:16:43-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
