<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Technology Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;category=Technology</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-06-19T04:51:02-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-06-19T04:51:02-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Facebook does more good than harm</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Facebook-does-more-good-than-harm/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;We will be debating whether the benefits of facebook outweight the detriments. Burden of the proof is equal.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;If you accept, you will be debating that facebook is bad. First round is for accepting only.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Facebook-does-more-good-than-harm/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-01T17:40:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mac is better then PC</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-better-then-PC/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Mac is way better then PC for tons of reasons and I have few of them

First mac is way faster then PC so you dont need to delete anything to make it faster
Second it is faster to play games on it and even if there are games that you can &quot;only&quot; play on windows there is stuff to play it on mac
Third windows sucks</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-better-then-PC/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T15:32:52-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should Government and Companies be allowed to spy on YOU through webcams, cameras, etc?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Government-and-Companies-be-allowed-to-spy-on-YOU-through-webcams-cameras-etc/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The government should not be allowed to spy on consumers through their own personal webcams, cameras, or any other video and or audio streaming devices. We have the 4th amendment in place (which to most Americans should be help above any law since it is the law of the land) which requires a warrant to be issued before any search. I believe that this search also includes violating your privacy. They (Companies and Government) should not be permitted to snoop through your cameras to purposely catch you doing something illegal which could be reported to local authorities.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Government-and-Companies-be-allowed-to-spy-on-YOU-through-webcams-cameras-etc/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-29T14:52:06-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>THBT Now is A Good Time To Be Young</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/THBT-Now-is-A-Good-Time-To-Be-Young/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I believe that now is not a good time to be young just because if you take a look at the current state of today's youth, the generation has take a turn for the worse. I say this because the children before used to go out and enjoy their lives and not worry of being abducted or assaulted. However, nowadays, parents don't let their child even leave the house because they are afraid of something bad happening to their children. Is this what you want Generation Y to be like? A bunch of cowards not even knowing how to defend themselves because they were so pampered by their parents? I presume your answer is no. Secondly, the state of the children in Africa in this decade is not that different from the state of the poverty-stricken people back in the 60's. You see, nothing has really improved compared to the olden days especially, in Africa. Now, of course the people of wealthy countries think that now is a good time to be young but, they don't consider the luck of t</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/THBT-Now-is-A-Good-Time-To-Be-Young/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-06-01T00:58:58-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>There should be more restrictions on violent video games</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-should-be-more-restrictions-on-violent-video-games/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round is acceptance. My First Debate on here. Don't take it easy on me.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/There-should-be-more-restrictions-on-violent-video-games/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-05-07T21:36:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>PC gaming is, on balance, better than console gaming.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/PC-gaming-is-on-balance-better-than-console-gaming./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Pro will argue that PC gaming is better, on balance, than console gaming. 

PC gaming will be defined as the following: &quot;PC games, also known as computer games, are video games played on a general-purpose personal computer rather than a dedicated video game console or arcade machine.&quot; {1}

Consoles are defined as the following: &quot;A video game console is an interactive entertainment computer or customized computer system that produces a video display signal which can be used with a display device (a television, monitor, etc.) to display a video game. The term &quot;video game console&quot; is used to distinguish a machine designed for people to buy and use primarily for playing video games on a TV.&quot; {2} 

Console gaming will therefore be defined as gaming on a console. 

First round is for acceptance
Second round is for opening arguments from both debators. 
Third round is for rebuttals. 
Fourth round is for further rebuttals and closing. No new arguments will b</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/PC-gaming-is-on-balance-better-than-console-gaming./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-02-27T12:12:49-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Laptops are Better Than Desktop Computers</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Laptops-are-Better-Than-Desktop-Computers/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is my first debate, so I won't be really good at it.
Here are some definitions:
Desktop computer-Computers that usually have: A monitor, a mouse, a keyboard and the actual computer.
Laptop: same as a desktop computer, though usually smaller can be taken from place to place. Usually has batteries.

Here is my first argument: Laptops have rechargeable batteries, so they can be used somewhere an electrical socket is not provided.
Second argument: Laptops can be taken from place to place, while desktop computers are harder to move.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Laptops-are-Better-Than-Desktop-Computers/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-30T15:11:58-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Teaching Java in Introductory programming courses</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Teaching-Java-in-Introductory-programming-courses/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Thanks to LarztheLoser for accepting the debate and I look forward to an enjoyable and educational debate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Resolution&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Introductory college courses in Computer Science should teach the Java programming language as opposed to Javascript.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Java&lt;/span&gt;: Java is a general purpose object oriented programming language details of which are shown in this link [1].&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Javascript&lt;/span&gt;: Javascript is an interpreted computer programming language originally implemented as part of web browsers more details of which are provided in the link[2]. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Burden Of Proof&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;BOP is shared.&amp;nbsp;Con must argue that JavaScript should be taught in introductory college courses as opposed to Java, not just that both are equally good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Backgro</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Teaching-Java-in-Introductory-programming-courses/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-03-28T22:37:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The advancement of Technology is Good</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-advancement-of-Technology-is-Good/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Hello, I am new here, so wish me luck, I guess.

Technology is advancing fast. It is making our lives easier and faster in many aspects. However, some are saying it is ruining the essential qualities or &quot;peace&quot; of life that they once enjoyed. Although I know how it feels to say goodbye to something, progress will always continue and is essential for a better lfiestyle.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-advancement-of-Technology-is-Good/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-02-14T11:42:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are video game restrictions in need of changing/updating (violence)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Are-video-game-restrictions-in-need-of-changing-updating-violence/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) After all of the school shootings and gun tragedies, everyone is pointing fingers. Video games are taking a lot of heat, and I believe they are singled out (it's more than one thing that got us in this mess). Still I believe there should be a change in the rules and restrictions, age related mostly, to better this issue.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Are-video-game-restrictions-in-need-of-changing-updating-violence/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-01-14T21:47:08-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Internet addiction</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Internet-addiction/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Hi everybody, I've just created this debate and arguments are about 8.000 charaters long and it's my first debate topic. So I've divided it into 3 rounds,I would like to say thanks for my oponet in advance.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Internet-addiction/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-04T06:22:42-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should Univerous allow non-premium members to sell limiteds?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Univerous-allow-non-premium-members-to-sell-limiteds/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Should non-premium users be able to sell limiteds? If we get more then 50 users opinion the rule will change, alt voting will not be tolerated.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Univerous-allow-non-premium-members-to-sell-limiteds/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-04-07T11:18:48-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>star wars vs star trek</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/star-wars-vs-star-trek/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is my opinion is that I think that star wars is so much better than star trek cause I love light sabers</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/star-wars-vs-star-trek/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-25T16:03:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Google Chrome is more useful than Mozilla Firefox</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Google-Chrome-is-more-useful-than-Mozilla-Firefox/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;I will be arguing that Google Chrome is more useful than Mozilla Firefox, and my opponent must argue that Mozilla Firefox is more useful than Google Chrome.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rules&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Round 1: Acceptance, definitons, and clarification.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Round 2: Arguments/Rebuttals&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Round 3: Rebuttals&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;Round 4: Rebuttals, Closing arguments&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definitons&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Google Chrome&amp;nbsp;is a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title=&quot;Web browser&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_browser&quot;&gt;web browser&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;developed by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title=&quot;Google&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that uses the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title=&quot;WebKit&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit&quot;&gt;WebKit&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; tit</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Google-Chrome-is-more-useful-than-Mozilla-Firefox/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-12-17T14:13:42-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Capable until proven incabable.. Internet edition..</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Capable-until-proven-incabable..-Internet-edition../1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I am officially a noob on this website... I have but one forum post... And this is my first official debate... The question is, am I capable of making a good argument, and speaking for all the people out there who are or were once noobs, I claim that I should be judged as coherent by the debate.org community until gone astray..</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Capable-until-proven-incabable..-Internet-edition../1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-03-28T17:34:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Top android smartphones have better hardware than the iphone 5</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Top-android-smartphones-have-better-hardware-than-the-iphone-5/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I feel that top android smartphones have better hardware than the iphone 5. First round is for acceptance only.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Top-android-smartphones-have-better-hardware-than-the-iphone-5/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2013-01-04T11:25:12-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mac is Better than Windows</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-Better-than-Windows/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Mac is better than windows because they boot using EFI strings instead of hardware, meaning faster booting/running speeds, and they utilize RAM more efficiently and don't crash often, due to the fact that they run on Unix. Although the upfront costs for purchasing Macs may be more expensive than Windows, updating the operating system and keeping the computer secure are both large concerns with Windows, and cost a lot. Macs are $30 per upgrade. With Mac, there is an app store and you know what you are getting. If there is a malfunction, you only need to deal with three companies: Apple, Intel, and AMD, whereas with windows, you must deal with multiple companies. Macs can last forever and use an old software and windows cannot. Apple only uses the best processors from Intel: Core 2 Duo, i5, dual core i5, dual core i7, and Intel Xeon &quot;Westermere&quot;. They o not use i3 because although the gigahertz may be better than that of core 2 duo, the material of core 2 duo is </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mac-is-Better-than-Windows/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-12T18:07:07-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iron Man can beat Hulk!!!!</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Iron-Man-can-beat-Hulk/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Iron Man can beat Hulk in a few seconds.
 
Hulk is just a monster and cannot even fly, whereas Iron Man and his 40+ armored suits can beat him. Hulk is no match for him. If Hulk tries to punch him Iron Man will fly and just blow him with the amassed missile. Iron Man has so many weapons and if he uses even one of them he could easily blow off Hulk.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Iron-Man-can-beat-Hulk/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-12-31T04:57:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>nuclear power is a reasonable approach to generating electricity</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/nuclear-power-is-a-reasonable-approach-to-generating-electricity/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) First round for acceptance and definitions.

nuclear power: power derived from nuclear energy. [1]
reasonable approach: needs no defining.

Rules: 
2 rounds for arguments and rebuttals
voting period 2 weeks
72 hours to argue
8000 character limit.

Good luck.

[1]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nuclear+power</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/nuclear-power-is-a-reasonable-approach-to-generating-electricity/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-10-06T01:29:16-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>xbox</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/xbox/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I will debate how xbox is a poorly made gaming system. One main reason why i was very upset with the system is the &quot;red rings of death&quot; after you get this your console is complete fried and its useless. Their are tricks that can help your xbox to get back and running but it will only damage your xbox even more. Also after the chip gets the red ring of death most likely something will get messed up with the system. this has happen to my xbox several time.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/xbox/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-12-24T22:19:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
