 |
socialpinko's Debates
  |
It is more likely than not that an afterlife does not exist
The Pro will have the primary burden of proof in formulating and defending an argument against the existence of an afterlife. Con's burden will be to deconstruct and refute Pro's case.
===Definitions===
An afterlife is defined as "the concept of a realm, or the realm itself (whether physical or transcendental), in which an essential part of an individual's identity or consciousness continues to reside after the death o...
Is it right for America to have Nuclear Weapons
I think that America is right to have Nuclear weapons of mass destruction. It would keep the peace between other World powers that refuse to give up their nuclear weapons of mass destruction. I think that its a way to keep the other countries that do have nuclear weapons at bay from attacking a country without them and starting world war 3....
The teleological argument for God's existence is unsound
The Pro will have the primary burden of proof in formulating and defending an argument against the teleological argument as defined. Con's burden will be to deconstruct and refute Pro's case.
===Definitions===
The teleological argument is purposely defined rigidly. The resolution applies only to this specific formulation of the teleological argument. The reason for this note is that there are numerous formulations of the a...
There are no compelling objections to anarchism
The resolution for this debate will deal with anarchism and whether it would have a legitimate possibility of effectively and qualitatively providing various social services which are generally recognized as necessary for the existence of civil society.
In this debate, Pro is tasked with establishing a general framework for the effective production of these services (as well as their plausibility, just saying it's possible that everyone wou...
Communism is Good
There will be 3 real rounds, this first post is to introduce the debate. My opponent should post after this, accepting the challenge....
There are no compelling objections to anarchism
The resolution for this debate will deal with anarchism and whether it would have a legitimate possibility of effectively and qualitatively providing various social services which are generally recognized as necessary for the existence of civil society.
In this debate, Pro is tasked with establishing a general framework for the effective production of these services (as well as their plausibility, just saying it's possible that everyone wo...
Women make better politicians than men.
Women make better politicians than men. First, women have the feeling of motherhood, love towards the country and people, this feeling always gives them support in handling politics. They care about everyone and every time. Second, women are better survivors than men. A woman can out-think a man, every time. Women are more honest and a lot more organized than men. They make way better decisions. Third, women can do a better job then men because they will make their responsibilities with more...
Compatibilism is false
Pro in this debate will argue that free will and (causal) determinism are incompatible; that if every event is necessitated by previous conditions and events, then human beings cannot also possess the ability to choose among possible courses of action. The BoP is on Pro to bring an argument and to defend it in support of the resolution. Con's only burden is to deconstruct/refute Pro's argument.
===Definitions===
"Comp...
Homosexual actions are immoral
= = = = = = = Introduction = = = = = = =
This debate is on the morality of homosexual acts with more emphasis on sodomy but not excluding other homosexual acts. I will have the burden of proof in this debate and as such, will be arguing for the affirmation of the resolu...
A day when you don't come across any problem you can be sure that you are travelling in a wrong way
A day without a problem means that we are perfect but nothing in this world is 100% perfect....