Debate.org members
United Nations Debates
- The United States should withdraw from the United Nations
- Resolve: Failled nations are a greater threat to the united states than stable nations
- United States should denounce the United Nations
- Resolved: When in conflict, the United Nations should prioritize global poverty reduction over envir
- The United Nations is terminally paralysed: the democratic world needs a forum of its own
- Members of the United Nations Security Council should strictly enforce the Nuclear NPT
United Nations Debates
History and Debate of United Nations
The United Nations is an organization that focuses on developing and enforcing international laws and policies. The main goals of the UN are to achieve peace, social progress and economic development. The organization was founded after the end of World War II in 1945 as a way of replacing the failing League of Nations. There are currently 192 nations that are a member of the United Nations, and this includes all sovereign nations in the world except the Vatican. The Headquarters of the United Nations is located in New York City in the United States; the current President is Li Baodong of China.
The UN has several assemblies. The General Assembly is the main body of the UN and meets yearly. Each session lasts several weeks. During the first two weeks, all members are given the opportunity to address the assembly and bring items to the attention of the board. The General Assembly also votes on important issues. A two-thirds majority is needed in order to approve a law, an election or expulsion of a member.
The Security Council is a division of the United Nations whose goal is to maintain peace between nations. This is the only council with the power to make binding decisions which the members must carry out. All other councils can only make recommendations. Fifteen nations have members on the Security Council. Five of these are permanent and ten are temporary. China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom and the United States are the only permanent members.
The International Court of Justice is a division of the United Nations that is responsible for international trials and legal decisions. Its headquarters are located in the Netherlands. This court has heard cases of war crimes, ethnic cleansing and the like. The International Criminal Court is a division that began operation in 2002. This court judges those who have tried to commit war crimes and genocide across several nations and have violated international law in doing so.
The United Nations also includes several specialized agencies that work on particular issues. For example, the World Health Organization is dedicated to improving the health status of those in impoverished nations and ensuring that nations provide adequate health care for their citizens.
Funding for the United Nations comes from voluntary donations by member nations. The General Assembly is responsible for overseeing the budget and determining the capacity of each nation to pay based on their gross domestic product, or GDP. Less developed nations are asked to contribute less and instead advised to use their resources to improve the status of their nations.
Debating the Effectiveness of the United Nations
In recent years, participants in the United Nations debate have questioned the organization’s effectiveness. Those who criticize the organization often feel that the small administrative structure undermines the UN's peace keeping mission. Also, there are few repercussions in place for nations that do not follow mandates. Permanent members of the Security Council have been known to avoid mandates themselves because they cannot lose their status as members as easily. Still, many people believe that the United Nations provides a great basis for international relationships. Though the organization was founded over 50 years ago, it is still able to oversee the international court system and bring justice to many dangerous criminals. Without the United Nations, the world would be a very different place.
For United Nations
Pro
Comment: Better the UN sort out world problems than the US. Besides as a neutral organization it could handle situations much better than the US could.
Comment: Look, this isn't the League of Nations. In the UN we actually have an organisation which can organise responses to global crises. So why ditch it?
Comment: United Nations role is too limited rather US roles on its side
Comment: Better than nothing, I guess.
Comment: Incompetent, ineffectual, riddled with holes and contradictions, and mankind's best hope for a better future. In the future, we will either learn to govern as one species, or we will govern not at all.
Comment: A force for globalization is always good. UN needs reform, but it's a good start.
Comment: Strongly support the participation and compliance with the UN.
Comment: A positive if relatively ineffective meeting ground for the nations of the world. If we really plan to solve the world's problems, we will have to up the ante a bit - generally, however, I think that the UN has helped rather than hindered world progr
Comment: Good for keeping nations within diplomatic relations.
Comment: to a certain extent
Against United Nations
Con
Comment: Sovereignty for each nation.
Comment: A ROGUE NATION has appeared! UNITED NATIONS used SANCTIONS! It's not very effective...
Comment: I am 100% against any globalized government of any kind. The UN is only interested in Global Control. They are more interested in global taxes, global internet control, global drug control, global gun control, etc. After they start worrying about starving kids, AIDs in Africa, maltreatment of women in India and the Middle East, the gross human rights violations in China and North Korea, then they can talk to us about how much the world needs the UN. The US needs to get out of the UN and kick them off our soil.
Comment: Making pointless bickering an art form.
Comment: "The [UN] Commission [On Human Rights] was undermined by the "politicization of its sessions [and the] selectivity of its work." Indeed, "politicization and selectivity," said Mr. Annan, were nothing less than "hallmarks of the Commission's existing
Comment: Again. Politicians are all full of shit. These people don't know wtf they're doing, and it's all political anyway. It's also not helping much (globally) and certainly working against the U.S. in terms of funding.
Comment: The idea of any organization which includes China, Myanmar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia working towards peace and liberty is a colossal joke.
Comment: Only if someone like hitler was incharge
Comment: It is non-productive and biased towards specific, more powerful nations.
Comment: Never gets anything done

