Farewell CsareoPosted 6 years Ago
I'm shutting down my account now. Feel free to vote on my final debate. I put a lot of passion into this one
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
![]() |
Csareo's Forum Posts
![]() |
At 5/24/2014 12:50:19 AM, progressivedem22 wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:48:57 AM, Csareo wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:48:00 AM, progressivedem22 wrote:
So, YYW has inspired me. I think I'm going to do a fan fic on the 2016 election. I'll ensure to the best of my ability that it doesn't mirror his or anyone else's.
Feel free to sign-up here. I'm not sure how many people I'll need, but I'll work you into this somehow.
I may use real politicians for the candidates, but that doesn't mean DDO'ers won't also be in the race, or managing campaigns, etc. In fact, I may even want to interview a few people to gauge where they stand politically.
Sign-ups:
1.
.
.
.
ad infinitum
Hint: Don't make sign ups. Just put the people in your fic anyways.
Why would I want to include someone who doesn't want to be featured?
Heck, I never promised that people would be portrayed in a good light hahaha. This is effectively a de facto release form.
At 5/24/2014 12:48:00 AM, progressivedem22 wrote:
So, YYW has inspired me. I think I'm going to do a fan fic on the 2016 election. I'll ensure to the best of my ability that it doesn't mirror his or anyone else's.
Feel free to sign-up here. I'm not sure how many people I'll need, but I'll work you into this somehow.
I may use real politicians for the candidates, but that doesn't mean DDO'ers won't also be in the race, or managing campaigns, etc. In fact, I may even want to interview a few people to gauge where they stand politically.
Sign-ups:
1.
.
.
.
ad infinitum
At 5/23/2014 8:01:22 PM, Csareo wrote:
I will not respond to any posts on this forum. Thank you for your time....
https://docs.google.com...
At 5/24/2014 12:37:27 AM, bluesteel wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:32:32 AM, Csareo wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:28:36 AM, bluesteel wrote:
And we did lose a good member today -- the promise of a reformed jifpop that we were promised yesterday; we lost him to the troll-y jifpop we all know and don't love.
My friend, are you aware of the context of the situation? I believe not, as the context was deleted by our humble airmax.
I request you don't question my integrity without knowing the situation. If you want to flesh it out over PM, I'll be happy to do so
I know the context. You accused mikal of multi-accounting which is absurd. Your promise of reformation lasted a whole 24 hours.
At 5/24/2014 12:28:09 AM, Mikal wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:25:30 AM, airmax1227 wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:20:56 AM, Csareo wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:17:01 AM, whiteflame wrote:At 5/23/2014 10:42:57 PM, Romanii wrote:
http://www.debate.org...
Within an hour of joining, he instigated a promising debate on minimum wage, which promptly got resolution-sniped by a certain member... some other prominent users then started complimenting the resolution-sniper on his smart move, causing the new user to get a bad impression of the site as a whole and leave.... am I the only one who feels bad about this?
It seems as though you were being too harsh on him, Jif, and assuming that it was Mikal just makes it all the worse. Even if you felt sure, the chance that such accusations would push a new member away isn't worth the public shaming of an already prominent member. I get that you and he have your own personal tiff that you're working through, but try not to include new members in it, and try to be a little more courteous and reasonable when someone posts a topic that's slightly off kilter. Hell, to this day I've never accepted a topic I felt wasn't absolutely crystal clear, and especially with someone new to the site, you could stand to give them a little leeway.
I do have my suspicions, but now is not the time or place to bring them up. I would explain over PM, but Airmax deleted three forums of evidence
What do you mean I deleted three forums of evidence?
All I removed was the one thread where you accused Mikal of multi-accounting, which again is entirely inappropriate.Your right though. I asserted a ton of accusations and pressure on him.
Can you also state that its false so we can move on
At 5/24/2014 12:28:36 AM, bluesteel wrote:
And we did lose a good member today -- the promise of a reformed jifpop that we were promised yesterday; we lost him to the troll-y jifpop we all know and don't love.
At 5/24/2014 12:25:30 AM, airmax1227 wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:20:56 AM, Csareo wrote:At 5/24/2014 12:17:01 AM, whiteflame wrote:At 5/23/2014 10:42:57 PM, Romanii wrote:
http://www.debate.org...
Within an hour of joining, he instigated a promising debate on minimum wage, which promptly got resolution-sniped by a certain member... some other prominent users then started complimenting the resolution-sniper on his smart move, causing the new user to get a bad impression of the site as a whole and leave.... am I the only one who feels bad about this?
It seems as though you were being too harsh on him, Jif, and assuming that it was Mikal just makes it all the worse. Even if you felt sure, the chance that such accusations would push a new member away isn't worth the public shaming of an already prominent member. I get that you and he have your own personal tiff that you're working through, but try not to include new members in it, and try to be a little more courteous and reasonable when someone posts a topic that's slightly off kilter. Hell, to this day I've never accepted a topic I felt wasn't absolutely crystal clear, and especially with someone new to the site, you could stand to give them a little leeway.
I do have my suspicions, but now is not the time or place to bring them up. I would explain over PM, but Airmax deleted three forums of evidence
What do you mean I deleted three forums of evidence?
All I removed was the one thread where you accused Mikal of multi-accounting, which again is entirely inappropriate.
Your right though. I asserted a ton of accusations and pressure on him.
At 5/24/2014 12:17:01 AM, whiteflame wrote:At 5/23/2014 10:42:57 PM, Romanii wrote:
http://www.debate.org...
Within an hour of joining, he instigated a promising debate on minimum wage, which promptly got resolution-sniped by a certain member... some other prominent users then started complimenting the resolution-sniper on his smart move, causing the new user to get a bad impression of the site as a whole and leave.... am I the only one who feels bad about this?
It seems as though you were being too harsh on him, Jif, and assuming that it was Mikal just makes it all the worse. Even if you felt sure, the chance that such accusations would push a new member away isn't worth the public shaming of an already prominent member. I get that you and he have your own personal tiff that you're working through, but try not to include new members in it, and try to be a little more courteous and reasonable when someone posts a topic that's slightly off kilter. Hell, to this day I've never accepted a topic I felt wasn't absolutely crystal clear, and especially with someone new to the site, you could stand to give them a little leeway.