EthicsPhilosopher
 
Online:5 Years Ago Name:
Updated:6 Years Ago Gender:Female
Joined:6 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:EthicsPhilosopher@gmail.com
Ideology:Libertarian Education:Other
Party:Libertarian Party Ethnicity:Not Saying
Relationship:Not Saying Income:Not Saying
Interested:No Answer Occupation:Not Saying
Looking:No Answer Religion:Not Saying
About Me:I know my profile says 14, but it doesn't go any further down. I am actually 13. I enjoy debating and believe that if I practice enough I can go to college for debating.

Norwegian Whaling

DeletedUser
EthicsPhilosopher

I will be arguing in favor of Norway's minke whale hunt. Opponent can start with arguments. Only accept this if you are capable of completing the debate. Thank you!...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Rap Battle of 2014: The Squeakquel

jp_porwisz10
EthicsPhilosopher

First round is acceptance...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

God most likely does NOT exist

A_Flying_Toaster
EthicsPhilosopher

Good evening reader. As you may know, DDO has been having a lot of debates recently as to the existence of God, usually named "God Most Likely Exists." Personally, I wish we had more of a variety of debates because I am tired of getting on her and seeing yet another debate like this. But I think I have to come to defend the Atheist viewpoint once again although I really hate doing so. This first round is just to say "Hello" to my future opponent. And to let he or she know that I am rather open o...

Post Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Apples are better than Oranges

Xanxus
EthicsPhilosopher

Do believe that apples are better than oranges? If you don't think accept the debate and tell us why. Here no one is really right or wrong this is just an exercise to practice communicating our rationale to others and backing up our points. Let's do this! Round 1 -Acceptance Round 2 -Opening Statements Round 3- Rebuttals and Conclusions...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago

Russia would defeat the USA in a war.

TheRussian
EthicsPhilosopher

I will be arguing that Russia would defeat the USA in a war. These will be the conditions for our debate. 1. No nuclear weaponry. Just "traditional" warfare. 2. No allies, just 1 v 1, Russia vs. USA. 3. US is the aggressor (realistic considering America's aggressive war history.) 4. My opponent has the choice of arguing how/from where the US would strike. 5. Total war. No outside help, just the two countries brawling it out. 6. We will not consider future military projects, only what reso...

Post Voting Period
16 Comments
Updated 6 Years Ago
EthicsPhilosopher
Debates:7
Lost:1
Tied:3
Won:3
Win Ratio:75.00%
Percentile:94.29%
Elo Ranking:2,159
Forum Posts:0
Votes Cast:0
Opinion Arguments:3
Opinion Questions:0
Poll Votes:299
Poll Topics:0
EthicsPhilosopher has not added any photo albums.
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
AbortionUnd
Affirmative ActionCon
Animal RightsPro
Barack ObamaCon
Border FencePro
CapitalismPro
Civil UnionsPro
Death PenaltyPro
Drug LegalizationPro
Electoral CollegePro
Environmental ProtectionPro
Estate TaxPro
European UnionPro
Euthanasia
Federal ReservePro
Flat TaxUnd
Free TradePro
Gay MarriagePro
Global Warming ExistsPro
GlobalizationPro
Gold StandardCon
Gun RightsPro
HomeschoolingUnd
Internet CensorshipCon
Iran-Iraq WarUnd
Labor UnionN/S
Legalized ProstitutionPro
Medicaid & MedicarePro
Medical MarijuanaPro
Military InterventionUnd
Minimum WageCon
National Health CareCon
National Retail Sales TaxN/O
Occupy MovementN/S
Progressive TaxN/S
Racial ProfilingCon
RedistributionPro
Smoking BanPro
Social ProgramsPro
Social SecurityUnd
SocialismCon
Stimulus SpendingN/O
Term LimitsN/O
TortureCon
United NationsN/S
War in AfghanistanN/O
War on TerrorPro
WelfarePro

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.