Online:3 Years Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:3 Years Ago Gender:Male
Joined:4 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:- Private -
Ideology:Conservative Education:Some College
Party:Not Saying Ethnicity:White
Relationship:Not Saying Income:Not Saying
Interested:No Answer Occupation:Student
Looking:No Answer Religion:Christian - Baptist
About Me:I am a seminary student who is studying pastoral ministries and theology. I am a staunch libertarian/conservative/confederate who does not identify with any particular party. I tend to vote Republican simply because they are the more conservative out of the two party platforms.
Activities:I enjoy reading, studying, and playing video games.
Beliefs:I am a reformed Baptist Christian.
Books:The Bible, The Road to Serfdom (Friedrich Hayek) , Everything You Were Taught About The Civil War is Wrong (Lochlainn Seabrook), The King James Only Controversy (Dr. James White), The Forgotten Trinity (Dr. James White), What is Reformed Theology (R.C. Sproul), and many others.
Music:Gospel music.
Quotes:"Socialism states that you owe me something simply because I exist. Capitalism, by contrast, results in a sort of reality-forced altruism: I may not want to help you, I may dislike you, but if I don't give you a product or service you want, I will starve. Voluntary exchange is more moral than forced redistribution." - Ben Shapiro
TV Shows:Seinfeld!

The doctrine of the trinity is Scriptural.

Scruggs
Jacobbruce

The intention of this debate is to engage the doctrine of the trinity. I am not looking to debate someone who is not a Christian (i.e., a Jew, Muslim, etc.). I want to debate a unitarian Christian regardless of affiliation (Arian or Socinian). The debate will be structured as follows:Round 1 - AcceptanceRound 2 - Initial Argument(s)Round 3 - Rebuttal(s)Round 4 - Second Round of Rebuttal(s)Round 5 - Closing Statement(s)There are only three rules:1) Do not accept this debate without my permission....

Debating Period
9 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Racial diversity is not a strength.

Scruggs
devcoch

This debate concerns whether or not racial diversity is a strength in the United States. This debate specifically focuses in on the United States, but feel free to pull examples from other places if you find it useful. I will be arguing that racial diversity in the United States is not a strength and, by accepting this debate, you will be arguing that racial diversity is a strength in the United States. Structure:Round 1 – AcceptanceRound 2 – Initial Argument(s)Round 3 – Rebut...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Atheist, are under Gods wrath, no attempts should be made to convert them.

FollowerofChrist1955
Scruggs

This debate is to believers, and holds that the atheist is not to be pursued for conversion. This is based on empirical evidence of the scriptures instructions. For centuries the Christians wastes countless, hours, days weeks, months and years in attempts to convert an atheist, when multiple unbelievers, might have been saved, by the same believer had they not wasted time with an atheist. As believers know time grows short and time is of the essense, must get the word out to those who "can" be...

Post Voting Period
58 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Is it humane that water hoses are being used for the Dapl protesters, in freezing conditions?

Spiritpaw
Scruggs

I have created another debate about the Dapl. The first one I did, that person forfeited. It was quite sad. Anyone can join, also, if you want to be hasty, then you can start the arguing on round 1. Here are the rules 1) no trolling 2) when you state something, have evidence 3) the evidence can't be Wikipedia 4) don't personally attack me, and vice versa...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

(Pro) The Christian God is malevolent vs benevolent (Con).

Stupidape
Scruggs

Round one I will be arguing that the Christian God is evil. My opponent will argue that the Christian God is good.DefinitionsGod ""(in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being." [0]"Malevolent"1. Having or exhibiting ill will; wishing harm to others; malicious.2. Having a harmful influence: malevolent stars."Benevolent"1.a. Characterized by or given to doing good: "a benevolent philanthropist who d...

Post Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago
Scruggs
Debates:3
Lost:0
Tied:0
Won:3
Win Ratio:100.00%
Percentile:94.30%
Elo Ranking:2,145
Forum Posts:474
Votes Cast:0
Opinion Arguments:2
Opinion Questions:0
Poll Votes:14
Poll Topics:0
Scruggs has not added any photo albums.
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
AbortionCon
Affirmative ActionCon
Animal RightsCon
Barack ObamaCon
Border FencePro
CapitalismPro
Civil UnionsN/O
Death PenaltyCon
Drug LegalizationPro
Electoral CollegePro
Environmental ProtectionCon
Estate TaxCon
European UnionCon
EuthanasiaCon
Federal ReserveCon
Flat TaxPro
Free TradePro
Gay MarriageN/O
Global Warming ExistsCon
GlobalizationCon
Gold StandardPro
Gun RightsPro
HomeschoolingPro
Internet CensorshipCon
Iran-Iraq WarCon
Labor UnionCon
Legalized ProstitutionCon
Medicaid & MedicarePro
Medical MarijuanaPro
Military InterventionCon
Minimum WageCon
National Health CareCon
National Retail Sales TaxCon
Occupy MovementCon
Progressive TaxCon
Racial ProfilingUnd
RedistributionCon
Smoking BanCon
Social ProgramsUnd
Social SecurityPro
SocialismCon
Stimulus SpendingCon
Term LimitsPro
TortureCon
United NationsCon
War in AfghanistanCon
War on TerrorCon
WelfarePro

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.