A Woman Cannot Be President

visionofdylan can't be serious, his arguments must be jokes.

visions is so immature. dont mind him.

I have been investigating the general idea behind a woman becoming President of any Nation and find it very intriguing.
I have not looked into the bio/psychological differences between the genders when making decisions, however I can't help but notice that obvious differences are very apparent.
Women approach problems somewhat different to men, they are definitely more subject to emotional influences. Typically they approach issues more passively (although I don't mean to generalise as I am aware of the likes of the 'Iron Maiden' etc). There are political positions that are dedicated to finding solutions with a passive vehicle, however, the president is not one of these. When making decisions on immigration policies for example, when presented with a sick /dying child a woman would be more likely to be sympathetic towards hoards of refugees wishing to leech off a countries social welfare system, the offspring of which bloats the already existing crime industry (if not feeding it). Again I am not trying to generalise, my point I guess is that yes a woman COULD make a good leader. However, a superpower such as the US who's policies and foreign influence affects the entire world, should never be controlled by anyone with impaired judgment whether it be impaired by emotion, selfishness and especially hypocrisy by those who protest for equality and yet still expect you to stand for them on the bus (apply the 'ladies first' attitude), give them half of your life savings, decide for you whether or not they will keep the baby, have default legal custody to the children, want to tee off closer to the hole, get 2 points in touch rugby when they score a try.

One further observation is that the only men that are for a woman being president are gay, if not then use this as a test for whether or not you actually are (it works I tried it and i'm not!!).

Because obviously, the ability to lead efficiently is dictated by traits carried in that part of the brain (Read: Penis)...

The second Aff. argument is based on stereotypes and rash conclusions. THos countries are no different with a women as president. ireland is still infamous for the hooligans and drunks, Indian food will always mess with your stomach, etc.

If you can prove to me that those "problems" are caused by a female being president, then I will agree.

Hahaha. As much as I hate Tatarize, I voted for him obviously.

In the end, it shouldn't be the gender that qualifies a person but the ability. Some women can be just as good if not better than some men as president and then there are some men that are better than some women as president. A person's gender should not be the up or down vote. You need to look at the person's records and qualifications. That being said, Hillary is not the woman that needs to be president.

thank the lord I live in the U S of A

These kind of debates remind me that this is the internet and it makes me smile.

Yes, unfortunately -- I really am in Austin right now. (I say that because I am originally from Nevada and am not liking the environmental adjustment...) Well that and I see Texas as a state full of people with a double dose of overbearing patriotism that I have never experienced before.

Anyway, you've gotten the wrong person, but thank you for inquiring...