Abortion should not be cut off after 3 monthes
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
cricket0206
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/21/2014 | Category: | Health | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 946 times | Debate No: | 59327 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
I know that a women should be cut off from abortion after literally 3 months because at that time they should of already had their plan figured out . They also should of known and took the precautions to the abortion and not waited 3 months to make the final decision.
It would be ideal for women who plan on getting an abortion to do so within three months, but that's not always realistic. Raising a baby is expensive, and so is carrying one to term, so it's no surprise that many women who get abortions are poor. Getting the money together for an abortion can often take more than three months. Also, it can take a few weeks for a woman to even know that she's pregnant, so if this is the case then she would have even less time to make a decision. By the way, it's *should have, not should of. |
![]() |
sanforever1 forfeited this round.
Okay, so no other arguments? May I also say that cutting off abortion after just three months could harm women that need abortion for medical reasons. Many of these medical reasons don't occur until after three months. Please, before you come and argue your opinion, have some more than one valid reason behind your opinion. I can think of many for mine. |
![]() |
sanforever1 forfeited this round.
I guess winning this will be pretty easy |
![]() |
sanforever1 forfeited this round.
And I guess that's the end of it. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
sanforever1 | cricket0206 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture