Aerogant is rude to his apponents
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
AlexanderOc
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/10/2014 | Category: | People | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,422 times | Debate No: | 60282 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (3)
 Pro  Con As far as we know, Aerogant doesn't own any debaters. Therefore he cannot be rude to them. Pro would have to prove Aerogant owns debaters in order to prove he is rude to them. |
 |
|
Pro Con He spammed about how intellectually challenged I am in a our debate, that's irrelevant though. Because he does not own me. So I'm not his debater. Nor am I his "apponent". Unless he owns you, then him calling you names is not relevant to the resolution. |
 |
|
Pro Con AlexanderOc forfeited this round. |
 |
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by AlternativeDavid 7 years ago
| saboosa | AlexanderOc | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: ff in final round. Pro had terrible spelling. Con proved that Aerogant does not possess any debaters. Pro made multiple claims without sourcing them.
Vote Placed by Domr 7 years ago
| saboosa | AlexanderOc | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved that no one is considered Aerogant's "debaters" as he does not own or control anyone other than himself. Conduct point for last round FF. Spelling from the title and in the debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 7 years ago
| saboosa | AlexanderOc | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments go to pro due to cons semantics. Conduct too.
"his" implies possession.
For example "Me and Rodney were in his car smoking weed"
Who's car is it?
Most likely Rodney's but they were high so the author may think it is his car, but it in reality the two could be sitting in an industrial trash compactor with little awareness of their surroundings.