All Propositions Are True
Debate Round Forfeited
wyw has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style:  Open  Point System:  7 Point  
Started:  9/23/2017  Category:  Philosophy  
Updated:  2 years ago  Status:  Debating Period  
Viewed:  643 times  Debate No:  104105 
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (0)
I previously instigated and participated in the following three discussions.
1. "All Propositions Are True," http://www.debate.org... 2. "All Propositions Are True," http://www.debate.org... 3. "All Propositions Are True," http://www.debate.org... The next paragraph is verbatim an argument I used in my opening arguments for the three aforementioned discussions. Consider the proposition p = "A rectangle is a square." Since some rectangles are squares, a rectangle is a square. Thus, p is true. Since some rectangles are not squares, a rectangle is not a square. Thus, p is not true. So by Conjunction Introduction, p is true and p is not true. But that is a contradiction. Since every proposition follows from a contradiction by the Principle of Explosion, the proposition "all propositions are true" is true. Therefore, all propositions are true.
If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. However, the proposition "Some propositions are true" is both true and is not selfdefeating, as my opponent's proposition ensues. Another argument: Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true. Therefore, my opponents argument is refuted. Another argument, from nebular displacement math: Propositions = 2 True = 1 False = 0 All = 7 7^1n*(sk^(2*0*1))*sin(7n) = 0 Therefore, it is not true that all propositions are true. 

From the last paragraph of my opening argument, all propositions are true. Since "not all propositions are true" is a proposition, the proposition is true. Thus, not all propositions are true. So by Conjunction Introduction, all propositions are true and not all propositions are true.
As the form and content of the argument that is the last paragraph of my opening argument suggest, the proposition "all propositions are true" is universally true in the sense that it is necessarily true. I agree that the proposition "Some propositions are true" is true, but regarding the issue of whether all propositions are true, I don't see where its truth leads to. I disagree with your premise that not all squares are rectangles. I also disagree with your premise that all rectangles are squares. That argument of yours is not sound. I'm not familiar with nebular displacement math. Your argument allegedly involving it appears to be nonsense. An Internet search(1) and its apparent lack of results regarding nebular displacement math support my position. Sources Cited: (1) https://www.google.com...
If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. However, the proposition "Some propositions are true" is both true and is not selfdefeating, as my opponent's proposition ensues. Another argument: Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true. Therefore, my opponents argument is refuted. Another argument, from nebular displacement math: Propositions = 2 True = 1 False = 0 All = 7 7^1n*(sk^(2*0*1))*sin(7n) = 0 Therefore, it is not true that all propositions are true. 

Your argument for round 2 is the same poor argument you provided for round 1.
This round has not been posted yet. 
Post a Comment
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by DeletedUser 2 years ago
lol
Report this Comment
Posted by canis 2 years ago
Pro died 8 weeks ago..
Report this Comment
Posted by sophiacharles 2 years ago
Yes it is not true that all propositions are true. If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true https://www.reecoupons.com... . Therefore, my opponent"s argument is refuted.
Report this Comment
Posted by sophiacharles 2 years ago
Yes it is not true that all propositions are true. If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true https://www.reecoupons.com... . Therefore, my opponent"s argument is refuted.
Report this Comment
Posted by sophiacharles 2 years ago
Yes it is not true that all propositions are true. If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true https://www.reecoupons.com... . Therefore, my opponent"s argument is refuted.
Report this Comment
Posted by sophiacharles 2 years ago
Yes it is not true that all propositions are true. If all propositions are true, then the proposition "Not all propositions are true" is true. This implies that the aforementions premise is not universally true. Not all squares are rectangles. All rectangles are squares. Since all squares can be both rectangles and also be said of a larger genus, namely that of shapes, it cannot be said that it is necessarily or sufficiently true that all propositions are true https://www.reecoupons.com... . Therefore, my opponent"s argument is refuted.
Report this Comment
Posted by wyw 2 years ago
Holla holla holla!
Report this Comment
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.