The Instigator
Adam_Godzilla
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points
The Contender
Wimhoff
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Almost irrefutably, Asexuality exists

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Adam_Godzilla
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/10/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 723 times Debate No: 118923
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

Adam_Godzilla

Pro

Arguments begin next round. Don't argue in round 1. Conduct points if you do.
Wimhoff

Con

I think asexuality doesn't exist because how can someone not want sex? It's evolutionarily necessary that we humans procreate. And anyway how can we trust someone when they say they are asexual?
Debate Round No. 1
Adam_Godzilla

Pro

minus conduct points to con. I said no arguments in round 1.

Numerous surveys were conducted interviewing asexuals. About 1% of the population are asexuals. Asexuality is actually now accepted as a sexual orientation in the scientific community. https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Asexuality#cite_note-Helm-2

These people truly truly don't want sex. Some have even had sex, Been married for years, And at the end after 40 years still say that sex was nasty. Is it a mental illnesss? Is something wrong with their brain? I don't know. But asexuality does exist.


https://www. Huffingtonpost. Com/entry/electrified-and-numb_us_58d018ace4b0e0d348b34624



Wimhoff

Con

I did some research, I agree with Pro, Sorry I concede the debate. Vote Pro!
Debate Round No. 2
Adam_Godzilla

Pro

thank you con.
Wimhoff

Con

Actually, I did some more readings. I think maybe asexuality is confused with low sexual libido. Maybe it's not an actual sexual orientation.
Debate Round No. 3
Adam_Godzilla

Pro

Suprisingas it may seem, Asexuals can experience high libido. They can have erections and orgasm from masturbation. They just don't want to do with other humans, Or don't fantasize about other humans. https://www. Omicsonline. Org/open-access/asexuality-dysfunction-or-sexual-orientation-2161-038X-1000185. Php? Aid=76817

Wimhoff

Con

Pro makes a good point.

I still think it's impossible to tell if someone is asexual. But Pro does say: "Almost irrefutably", And I suppose he's right.


Debate Round No. 4
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by BatmanoftheJLA 1 year ago
BatmanoftheJLA
Therefore, I can and will say, The debate did not happen as both pro and con made a stupid compromise. The way I see it, The debate was a joke. I am disappointed that snowflakes like you have become so dull to unbiased facts with evidence.
Posted by BatmanoftheJLA 1 year ago
BatmanoftheJLA
Another thing to add, Asexuals apparently have sex with partners so they are self contradicting themselves entirely so no, Asexuality doesn't exist for humans. Just because some law made it legal to identify as such bogus, It doesn't mean it makes it the truth.
Posted by BatmanoftheJLA 1 year ago
BatmanoftheJLA
The pro may have "won" but he or she has mixed up one important major thing. The definition of asexuality means being able to reproduce without having sex, And that ONLY occurs in certain animals NOT IN HUMANS. When people refuse to have sex, It is called abstinence. Monks and nuns did this throughout history and they still do today. You can ask them all about it. But yeah, Humans are not asexual and people should not be labelled as such, Nor should the retarded term "cisgender". Everything lgbtqpedos made up is bogus, "woke" and retarded bs.
Posted by Minddagger 3 years ago
Minddagger
i don"t think it should be identified as a sexuality, But it definitely exists
Posted by Shavo 3 years ago
Shavo
solid debate XD
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Anonymous 3 years ago
Adam_GodzillaWimhoffTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded but I'll award him conduct point for being open minded
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
Adam_GodzillaWimhoffTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession.
Vote Placed by Topaet 3 years ago
Topaet
Adam_GodzillaWimhoffTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.