American Republicans Are Bigger Liars Than The Nazis
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Spedman
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/3/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 2,429 times | Debate No: | 58546 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (30)
Votes (2)
American Republicans are not simply liars; they have developed it into an art form. They frequently use a technique popularised by Hitler whereby they reverse the truth entirely and attack their opponent with it. They do this because they know that politics is a game of public opinion and not fact.
One academic study reported by CNN concluded that Bush and his immediate aides publicly told 985 lies about Iraq alone in a two year period. Republicans are simply a milder version of the Nazis, except more concerned with economic gain than territorial expansion. They also know full well that 9/11 was an inside job, but have not stopped lying about it since 2001. "Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July (2001) that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. " http://news.bbc.co.uk... "This was controlled demolition. Without a doubt. A team of experts did this." (demolitions expert Danny Jowenko upon seeing WTC 7 collapse on video) http://www.dailypaul.com... Therefore, I claim American Republicans are bigger liars than the Nazis, and if you consider the total amount of Muslims and Communists they've killed, only marginally less genocidal.
Okay, I accept your challenge so I'll get to it. I think Republicans are liars too but to compare them to the Nazis is a little extreme. As a matter of fact I would say the Democrats or at least the far left are FAR worse with lying than the Republicans. Almost everything that has come out of President Barrack Obama's mouth has been an outright lie. Not to mention his cronies Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Obama lied about the ACA when he said you can keep your health care plan and doctor. He lied about Al-Qaeda being on the run and defeated when they were in fact very much still a threat. He lied about there being no Government corruption during the IRS scandal. Obama and those who support him are the worst of the liars in office not the Republicans. As far as Iraq is concerned Republicans and Democrats supported the invasion of Iraq including former Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton. 9/11 was an inside job?????? Okay, I think your argument went no where with that statement because Democrats also support the official story and just because WTC 7 was demolished doesn't mean it was an inside job. The building could of been to unstable to keep intact so they demolished it. 9/11 was not an inside job, but I do believe there are things about that day that have not been told. I would not trust a Pakistani official since they hate Americans almost more than anyone in the world and would probably say anything to discredit us. http://www.huffingtonpost.com... And making Republicans the only ones responsible for the killing of Muslims and Communists is completely unfair since Democrats have contributed to all of that as well. Lyndon Johnson was a Democrat and he was the one who sent us into Vietnam. |
![]() |
Con makes no attempt to refute the argument that Republicans are bigger liars than the Nazis, makes no attempt to address any of the evidence presented in the introduction, and instead responds by attacking Obama. This is the reaction of a typical Republican in that they are insane liars, incapable of defensively justifying their own position on any political issue, given that the only thing they know how to do is attack other people with lies, fallacy and slander.
Other Republican tricks include (but not exclusively): posting debunked sources; using sock accounts to vote in their own debates; posting 6,000 word defences of global warming denial; accusing Obama of being a Kenyan terrorist, confirmation bias and of course the classic straw man.
Okay, Pro I addressed every single one of your points and you are accusing me of only attacking Obama. I was merely trying to point out that Bush wasn't the only one who lied during his Presidency. You obviously did not read my argument. How can you accuse me of slander when that is all you are doing for this round. I am not a Republican supporter I am a Libertarian voter so saying that my argument is a "typical Republican response" is not relevant. You said in Round 1 that Republicans murdered millions of Communists and Muslims. President Obama ordered more drone strikes than Bush did and Bush used a lot. As to your Communist argument think of the wars we fought during the Cold War. The Korean Conflict and Vietnam all of which US involvement in those wars was started by Democratic Presidents, Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson. Although Kennedy ordered advisers into Vietnam initially he did not escalate it to 500,000 troops like Johnson did. Eisenhower and Nixon were the ones who ended US involvement in both of those conflicts who were BOTH Republican. During Korea, General Douglas MacArthur after being relieved of his command ran for President against Eisenhower as a Democratic candidate and wanted further US involvement in Korea. I am not trying to make Democrats look bad I am merely pointing out that your argument against Republicans for murdering Communists is not relevant since they were not responsible for any of the major Cold War conflicts fought by the US. My last point for this round is that ALL POLITICIANS LIE. Republican, Democrat, Liberal, Conservative, etc. Comparing any of our parties though to the Nazis is simply unfair and distasteful. I therefore retract my argument that Democrats are more like the Nazis because that is not valid argument. My entire argument of the first round was pointing out that Democrats lie just as much as the Republicans. Today's politics are absurd even by our standards and they are becoming more and more like Roman politics with each day. THEY ARE ALL LIARS!!!!!!!!!! However, even though they are liars a lot of them do it for good reasons but also they do it for bad reasons. It is still unfair to call either party Nazis since both parties have their uses. |
![]() |
Quantumhead forfeited this round.
Okay, so now that my opponent has seemed to have forfeited let me say this as my closing argument. All politicians lie, but comparing any of ours to the Nazis who murdered millions of people is way too extreme of a statement and just plain distasteful. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
Quantumhead | Spedman | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Mray56 7 years ago
Quantumhead | Spedman | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.
Harry Reid recently said: "The border is secure." That is an example of poor leadership.
The Twin Towers collapsed as a result of the damage done by the impact of the planes(JUMBO JETS) and the heat from jet fuel which weakened NOT MELTED the structure of the Twin Towers which collapsed the upper floors and causing them to destroy the floors below them.
You should get it through your empty, indoctrinated head that al Qaeda does not have access to military-grade nano-thermite. Whatever your stupid neo-Nazi religion has convinced you of, the fact remains that Professor Harrit has a peer-reviewed paper in which he concludes the existence of high-energy thermitic material at GZ.
You're just so stupid that it's pointless even trying to convince you. It's like trying to convince a Christian that God does not exist. Fire does not melt steel you banana-brained idiot. This from the FEMA report:-
"It is much more difficult to tell if melting has occurred in the grain boundary regions in this steel as was observed in the A36 steel in the WTC 7."
http://www.fema.gov...
It doesn't matter what is said to you, or what evidence is presented to you, you will continue to use the bizarre argument that we are all crazy, with precisely the same disease, simply because we have enough brain matter to understand the official story is physically impossible.
You hate us in the same way the Catholic Church hated Galileo, pal. Because we pursue reason instead of comfort.
http://www.911myths.com...
I'd debate you any time on anything.
That's interesting, because earlier you accused me of writing an essay. Perhaps the reason you think I have "no arguments" is because YOU cannot read them or comprehend them. Not to mention, my 49-0 record defecates on your assertion that I "cannot properly read what I reply to."
How about you take caution before personally attacking your intellectual superiors?