Apple A7 SOC is better than snapdragon 800 SOC
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
danny123
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 4/6/2014 | Category: | Technology | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 888 times | Debate No: | 51738 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
 Pro Con Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed than apple. More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later( than apple) More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once than apple. More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads than apple. so look snapdragon beast and better. |
 |
|
Pro Clock speed does not count that much. Apple blows away the snapdragon 800 on a single-core geekbench test and is currently want of the fastest. Finally it's 64-bit which is a really good breakthrough for a mobile processor and makes it futureproof. So Apple has bought the future here. Con |
 |
|
Pro awsomecp173 forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 7 years ago
| awsomecp173 | danny123 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con dropped some of Pro's arguments, but Pro forfeited all together. Arguments and conduct to Con.
