The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Are Dictators better than presidents

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
debater8554 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/12/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 332 times Debate No: 110582
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




Dictators are the worst they claim a city for a unlimited number of years and North Korea has that dictator. Dictators are the worst. Please vote on this arguement.


Dictators are better because they are more effective than normal presidents. For example, they can make important reforms quickly, and if an autocrat actually cares about their people they can make sure their successor will rule like them ensuring that the nation would last a long time, and in success if they ruled well. There are a lot of rulers who did care for their people and not power, like Augustus Ceaser and Napoleon. Dictators can be bad also, like Hitler, but presidents can be bad too.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Hadii 3 years ago
I'd write more, but you made the character cap so low.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.