The Instigator
ScienceGamer
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheBoldDebator
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points

Are girls better than boys?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
TheBoldDebator
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/31/2018 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,912 times Debate No: 119689
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (54)
Votes (1)

 

ScienceGamer

Con

Boys > Girls. Just gotta accept that 100% legit fact.
TheBoldDebator

Pro

Why girls are better then guys:
1. Women can handle the stress of a job interview better.
2. Women are the reason you're alive.
3. Women make better bosses and managers.
4. Women have a stronger immune system.
5. Daughters are more likely to care for their parents.
6. Women can multi-task better.
7. Better at driving.
8. Running a successful business.
9. Coding.
10. Better learners.
11. Higher IQ's than men.
12. More clean.
13. Better looking.
14. Eat healthier.
15. Live longer.
16. Good problem solvers.
17. More cautious with investments.
18. Work harder.
19. Cook better.
20. Clean more.
21. Girls mature faster by 2-3 years.
-For the majority-
Debate Round No. 1
ScienceGamer

Con

Just replace the words women and daughters with men and sons and your statements are actually true. Facts don't care about your feelings.
TheBoldDebator

Pro

You are telling opinion. I tell facts. Now which do you think would be more true? If you're going to do a debate about something, Please do research on it and give an answer not based upon opinion.
Debate Round No. 2
ScienceGamer

Con

No I'm telling facts. YOU'RE telling opinions here m8. Here's a fact: Boys have a penis, Girls have a vagina. #libtardowned #FactsDontCareAboutYourFeelings
TheBoldDebator

Pro

First fact I've ever heard you say.
Debate Round No. 3
ScienceGamer

Con

And it was a good fact. The best fact. I have some of the greatest facts. Here's a scientifically proven fact: You listed no facts in your first argument. BOOM, KRASSENSTEINED!
TheBoldDebator

Pro

Actually, You are wrong. I DID do research and those things were the same on over 10 websites.
Debate Round No. 4
ScienceGamer

Con

Aight. Imma about to end this lady's whole arguing career with this argument. Boom bam bop badabop boom pow.
TheBoldDebator

Pro

On your next debate. Do please use real facts and evidence. Thank you for debating me.
Debate Round No. 5
54 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by ScienceGamer 3 years ago
ScienceGamer
You unfriended me and closed your account and then came back.
Posted by TheBoldDebator 3 years ago
TheBoldDebator
What?
Posted by ScienceGamer 3 years ago
ScienceGamer
What happened?
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
No I have one account and it is the one I am using here. That is an imposter.
Posted by omar234 3 years ago
omar234
yea juris he made another alt
Posted by ScienceGamer 3 years ago
ScienceGamer
I just ended someone's career with my latest argument.
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
Who are you speaking to Junis?
Posted by Juris 3 years ago
Juris
is this another alt account
Posted by Kvng_8 3 years ago
Kvng_8
yes it was and im not rebutting anything else cuz im done with this debate. Sorry i mean "discussion"
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
Happy New Year

Why not rebut my points?
Because from what I read about your comparisons to dogs it wasn't sufficient
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
ScienceGamerTheBoldDebatorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Copied from the first debate Con had on this topic: Con wants me to vote for Pro so I will. I think Con wanted to invoke a reaction that is it. Either he judged the reaction or just does not care about winning. I think he didn't take it seriously and he is okay with Pro winning. Fair play Con.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.