The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Are hamburgers sandwiches?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
TURTLEPANTS has forfeited round #4.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/22/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 625 times Debate No: 98346
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




Hamburgers are sandwiches. They consist of meat, a vegetable, and condiments placed between two buns.


So in order for my opponent to win this debate, my opponent has to prove ALL hamburgers are sandwiches, since he didn't put any quantifiers before hamburgers.

Therefore, I have to provide at least a situation in which a hamburger doesn't fulfill this requirement. "two or more slices of bread or a split roll having a filling in between"

So if you look at the definition of hamburger, it says " ground beef"

Nowhere does "ground beef" entail buns, therefore failing the requirement of "two or more slices of bread"
Debate Round No. 1


Thank you for responding to my debate, but unfortunately one of the links you provided contradicts the side from which you stand. Webster's dictionary does define "Hamburger" as "ground beef" or "a patty of ground beef". However, if you read the full page you will discover that it is also defined as, "A SANDWICH consisting of a patty of hamburger in a split typically round bun."


My opponent's response is only that the definition later on the website contradicts it, but this is when we get into battling definitions, as to which one to accept. Seeing as he provided no counter definition and the reason to prefer the counter definition, the debate proceeds with my definition.

By my opponent's logic, any word we tried to use would be self contradictory because of there being more than one definition on the internet.

Remind yourselves that in this debate, I'm only required to stop my opponent from proving his side.
Debate Round No. 2


Unfortunately, my opponent apparently did not read my full response, because if he had he would have noticed that I did provide a counter definition. As I quoted from, "A sandwich consisting of a patty of hamburger in a split typically round bun." Now, you claim that I need to provide definitions from other sources, so here you go: "A sandwich consisting of a cooked patty of ground or chopped beef, usually in a roll or bun, variously garnished." "A flat round cake of minced beef, fried or grilled and typically served in a bread roll garnished with various condiments." "1.
a. Ground meat, usually beef.
b. A patty of such meat.
2. A sandwich made with a patty of ground meat usually in a roll or bun."
All of these definitions define a hamburger as a type of sandwich.


What I meant by my opponent has provided no counter definition, is that he still HAS NOT given a reason to prefer his definition over mine.

This is why I mentioned the definition debate, my opponent has not talked about any reason to prefer his definition, and in fact mentions my definition as well, without establishing which one to use.

My opponent can not just bring up a definition that says something else, and say my definition is wrong, because by this logic so would his, and pretty much any definition of a word in the whole world.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Sonofcharl 2 years ago
You beat me to it SJM.
A hamburger is the meaty bit, The bun is a completely separate issue.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.