Bitches and cocks are helpful
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Vexorator
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/9/2014 | Category: | Funny | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 900 times | Debate No: | 60209 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)
 Pro Argument: My argument is that bitches and cocks are helpful to people. Definitions: Bitch: a female dog, wolf, fox, or otter. Cock: a male bird, especially a rooster. Rules: Round 1 will be for acceptance.  Con |
 |
|
Pro I said that round 1 will be "for acceptance." This means that the contender accepts the debate. You did the right thing by not explaining "why u thought so." I will now explain my position. Bitches: Bitches can be used for guiding blind people. They also make good pets in giving company to people. Cocks: Cocks can be eaten, and people need food. Cocks can also wake people up in the morning at dawn. Con |
 |
|
Pro You said that bitches are "just a crutch." They are still helpful to humans, nonetheless. There are still people who use cocks, not clocks. Look at the poor people in third world countries who do not have electricity, or maybe the amish people. Also, "generally not reared for meat" does not mean never. They are still eaten, which means that they are helpful to humans. Con |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| Vexorator | CodyLTJames | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Concession
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
| Vexorator | CodyLTJames | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: con concessions
Vote Placed by Mister_Man 7 years ago
| Vexorator | CodyLTJames | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty obvious. Con even admitted Pro was correct.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 7 years ago
| Vexorator | CodyLTJames | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: S&G should be obvious. As to arguments, it rather seems like Con conceded in the last round, and certainly failed to rebut Pro's points. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
