Blue pill or Red pill
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
omar2345
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 3/21/2019 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 720 times | Debate No: | 120946 | ||
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)
 Pro I made it 2k characters so that there isn't too much said.
I take the side of the blue pill. If you want to start in Round 1 go ahead but if you want me to start then I will give my argument in Round 2.
 Con |
 |
||||
|
Pro That is not an argument because I already stated the definition. It did not inclulde communism. My reasoning is that the goal for humans is happiness and what best to do with then the blue pill. The red pill only tells you the truth which doesn't mean you will find closure in it or derive happiness from it. Con |
 |
||||
|
Pro Still has not given an argument. Happiness is fulfilled by the blue pill. Red pill cannot assure that. Con |
 |
||||
|
Pro Nothing in my definition stated it would be painful. There isn't many cases where you can have pain while also having happiness and I can't think of any that is consistent so the blue pill does mean you will be happy which means you will avoid pain or pain will not even occur. Con has failed to proved an argument in the debate and if Con does in the last Round then that is a conduct point for me because it does not give me time to respond. Con |
 |
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Leaning 3 years ago
| omar2345 | 12InchBeef | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con trolled the debate and insulted Pro, Con loses conduct. Con had atrocious grammar and spelling and thus loses that. Con made no argument 'actually relevant to the debate, while Pro did, Pro wins most convincing.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
| omar2345 | 12InchBeef | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Yes, debaticus, we do see the reason. I will remove my vote if you offer an adequate vote, and valid rfd.
Vote Placed by Debaticus 3 years ago
| omar2345 | 12InchBeef | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Does anybody even see this reason?
Saying it if he/she didn't accept debate challenges either change it or accept the debate quickly. Turns out he/she does accept allowing other people to challenge him/her.
But I take red because, As it has been already explained, It's communist.
Okay. I will create the debate again. Make sure you are accepting debates if not make sure you accept the debate before someone else does.
(Voted for you because of lack of conduct from con)