The Instigator
Lookingatissues
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
K_Michael_Tolman
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Border fences. . . . Walls, Are necessary to Protect a nations soverinty.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
K_Michael_Tolman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/31/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 282 times Debate No: 119682
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

Lookingatissues

Pro

DEBATE. Org, A New topic, New topic. . . Border fences/ Walls, Are necessary to Protect a nations sovereignty. By. . . Lookingattheissues 2
A nation can't survive if the borders aren't secure and will disingrate and fail like the once infameous Rome. Other countries by building fences /walls on their borders prove that they are effective in stopping invaders from invading a nation. Only those who believe in Nations without borders, A one world, Object to border fences/walls.
". . . . A brilliant college professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, Mexifornia, Explaining how immigration " both legal and illegal " was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream. The cost to America's citizens to provide welfare to aliens flooding America's cities and towns is growing by leaps and bounds to the point of dissolution and unsustainable and will collapse under the ever increasing demands made upon it. Since America's borders are ineffective in keeping out illegal aliens and the elite in politics and education, ". . . . Encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. "and adovcate". . . . . Replacing. . . . The melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. . . . And claim. . . . It is important to ensure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, Emphasizing their similarities. "
Dick Lamm, Former Governor of Colorado
March 11, 2017 Dan Volkman
"
America must have control of who and how many aliens are allowed to enter this country. An impregnable border is a must if a nation is long to remain a nation.
K_Michael_Tolman

Con

A nation CAN survive if the borders are not secure. Immigration BUILT America, And isn't likely to tear it apart. As for using Rome as an example of a failed country, Rome a) was the most powerful and successful empires of its time, And b) lasted a lot longer than America has so far. You can hardly cite it as evidence for the need of a strong border. A country from a similar time, Egypt, Had natural barriers that protected it from immigration and invaders, For a time. But then when armies did come, They were so isolated and technologically inferior that the Romans invaded. They integrated the Egyptians, And most other conquered civilisations into the Roman Empire, With out changing their culture significantly.
Debate Round No. 1
Lookingatissues

Pro

Lookingatissues forfeited this round.
K_Michael_Tolman

Con

K_Michael_Tolman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Lookingatissues

Pro

Lookingatissues forfeited this round.
K_Michael_Tolman

Con

Do I win. . .
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by K_Michael_Tolman 3 years ago
K_Michael_Tolman
I should hope you'll answer this. I'll consider myself the winner if you don't.
Posted by K_Michael_Tolman 3 years ago
K_Michael_Tolman
I just want to say that the title of this debate is terrible. Use possessive: nation's, Not "nations". "Soverinty" is spelled sovereignty.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
LookingatissuesK_Michael_TolmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con I am thinking was there for the entirety but didn't bother to give an argument or say something. Con did also forfeit less Rounds so he gets my vote on conduct.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.