The Instigator
nerosmoke
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
IWillTumblrShameYou
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Christ is real. Accept it Atheist gaytards!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2019 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 906 times Debate No: 120055
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (29)
Votes (0)

 

nerosmoke

Pro

Simple debate. If or not God is real or that Christ is real.

1st point of debate. "A. D. " stands for anno domini, Latin for "in the year of the lord, " and refers specifically to the birth of Jesus Christ. "B. C. " stands for "before Christ. "May 9, 2014 Keeping Time: The Origin of B. C. & A. D. - Live Science
https://www. Livescience. Com/45510-anno-domini. Html

Every calendar in the world is based from B. C AND A. D before Christ and after his death. Meaning records was maintained from around the time of the death of Christ. And are accurate with over 2000 years of fact checking going on. With other historical records.

2nd point of debate. The whole "In god we trust" that is on all of our money. What is all that about? You claim there is no god, When the $20 in my pocket claims a different story.

3rd point of debate. With is being so clear Christ was a real person why do so many retards pretend he was not? Do you guys think every calendar and historical record is wrong and that somehow you are right? Or that the people who print money know what is going on when they print "In got we trust" on American money?

1st round is denial, 2nd round is anger, 3rd round is bargaining, 4th round is depression, 5th round is acceptance.
IWillTumblrShameYou

Con

1. Records were not kept around at the time. No one actually knows when Jesus was born. So really we are just guessing his birth date.

2. It's a $20 dollar bill. Do you trust that more than actual evidence? This point really means nothing.

3. Jesus was most likely a real person. But probably not telling the truth. Also, Why are we retards for having another opinion?
Debate Round No. 1
nerosmoke

Pro

Con admits Christ is most likely real. debate won.

I also see a great deal of help for con in the comment section of this debate. This is practically cheating, And should this ever go to voting would likely have bias votes cast.

Here is some examples.

Posted by segregory 1 day ago

"IWillTumblrShameYou I think that you should explain your argument. All you have so far, Is saying that he is wrong. That is good for a first round, But share why you feel this way. Share what drives this hate for God. I have my opinion and always will, But I always like to hear reasoning. Explain your reasoning for why you think that God is not real. If you want a chance against nerosmoke then you are going to have to at least come up to his level on reasoning. Good luck, I look forward to the rest of the debate. "

How can one share a hate for something you claim does not exist?

As for why any of the commenter did not take this debate themselves? Its simple. They would also lose based on credited and factual arguments. Because this factual level of reasoning is much greater then any lie cast.
IWillTumblrShameYou

Con

IWillTumblrShameYou forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
nerosmoke

Pro

nerosmoke forfeited this round.
IWillTumblrShameYou

Con

IWillTumblrShameYou forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
nerosmoke

Pro

nerosmoke forfeited this round.
IWillTumblrShameYou

Con

IWillTumblrShameYou forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
nerosmoke

Pro

nerosmoke forfeited this round.
IWillTumblrShameYou

Con

IWillTumblrShameYou forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
29 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
I would like to debate you.
You can make the debate and make the opening argument.
Posted by nerosmoke 3 years ago
nerosmoke
@The Right Opinion debate me you coward! There is a reason you are posting in the comments instead of an actual debate.

Really? You think Christ has not been proven time and time again. Just like the calendar said so. Gona claim the calendar to be fake? Gona say everyone in the whole world is on the wrong day because you don't love Jesus? Go die in a hole gaytard!
Posted by The_Right_Opinion 3 years ago
The_Right_Opinion
The salt on this guy for being unable to differentiate "whether Jesus was a real guy" and "whether that proves Christ (holy supernatural figure in mythology) is real". Your premise made no sense in the first place. Suggesting that the "Son" might have been a guy at some point doesn't prove the "Father" or "Holy Spirit" exist by proxy either, And doesn't prove he / the people writing the books weren't making things up. Make up your mind. Are you trying to prove the existence of a god, Or that some guy existed at some point and became the focal point of a religion? I'm pretty sure this isn't even a religious debate any more than "was X historical figure real". Go back to a religious forum and have fun there or make a clearer debate and I'll be happy to discuss this with you.
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
@nerosmoke

You gave me definition of atheist gaytards and failed to realise a better would be Jesus deniers. That still stands because there are many Religions that do not even care or don't know who he is.

@segregory

You made a bad comment earlier stating how much better Pro is doing compared to Con. You were wrong. Here you are also wrong. I pretty much stated the flaws in his/her reasoning. It wasn't difficult that instead of actually wanting a debate he/she wanted to invoke a reaction with atheist gaytards bearing in mind it does not encompass all Jesus deniers.
Posted by nerosmoke 3 years ago
nerosmoke
The point is changing the calendar to remove some guy you don't like is stupid.
Posted by Thoht 3 years ago
Thoht
Changing the calendar to CE has nothing to do with swapping workdays.
Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
backwardseden
Awe the poor wittle wost poo poo with sad puppy jesus jujitsu eyes just cannot stand his roto rooter boasting club to the foot to the a$$ in being proven 100% wrong. Too bad. Oh darn. Snooze.
Posted by nerosmoke 3 years ago
nerosmoke
God, The Atheist-gaytards are posting videos in the comments now. Geezzz shi, Bro. Give it up.
Posted by backwardseden 3 years ago
backwardseden
jesus was either fraudulent and a fake od didn't exist.
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=6lqC8fvIspY - jesus wasn"t jesus (Aron Ra) #1
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=KXAGpCTiGlQ - The True Core of the jesus Myth (Christopher Hitchens) #2
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=apS_679ru50 - Did jesus Exist? #3
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=9AzwJ9d4i1g - Why christianity is Unreasonable (Richard Carrier) #4
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=x-slAgzJmdU - Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? #5
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=AJMd5UiTeys - Biggest Lie - The fourth gospel #6 ("The first striking revision in the 4th gospel is that the ministry of jesus has ballooned out from from one year to three. The writers not only make a reference not only from one but to three distinct passover festivals. Now was this just a tradition that some early christians held to a three year ministry and others to a one year ministry? Can anyone honestly maintain that whole dialogues could be remembered word for word for many decades and yet believers have no common agreement whether these words were said during one year or during three years? ") Um duh. Do you REALLY THINK jesus existed?
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=lDpEeHD54Mo&t=1397s - The Gospel According to Carrier #7 (Richard Carrier states jesus may have possibly existed, But scrap all the mythology)
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=O5AordEPtok - Proving the Historicity of Jesus? Tracie and David #8
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=hmKTUOzXRkI&t=188s - Stephanie Thomason vs Matt Dillahunty, Or how not to debate an Atheist! #9 (skip to the 7:00 mark! ) Oh this one is good and Pro is the caller with his furry tongue.
https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=NAqEmYJcXX8 - What did jesus do for you? #110
Posted by segregory 3 years ago
segregory
I am not agreeing with that phrase, But I will say that people will always use names that other people do not like. We have to get use to it and MOVE ON!
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.