Class War in the UK
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 4/24/2008 | Category: | Politics | ||
Updated: | 14 years ago | Status: | Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,394 times | Debate No: | 3768 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)
British society is tearing itself apart and it's only a matter of time before the Working Class rise up against their Upper Class oppressors, but who will emerge victorious?
For those unfamiliar with British society, the two sides can be identified as follows: The Upper Classes and their Allies: Aristocrats, Second Home-Owning Mega-Toffs, The Clergy, Right Wing Tabloid-Publishing Plutocrats, Volvo-Driving, Daily Mail-Reading Ultra-Orthodox Snobs, The Landed Gentry, Insider-Dealing City Fat Cats, EU Subsidy-Scrounging Farmers, Supermarket Magnates, International Property Tycoons, Public Utility Profiteers. Celebrity Daughters of Former Tory Chancellors of the Exchequer. The Working Class and their Allies: Underpaid, Over-Exploited Workers, Thugs, Neds, Chavs, Yobs, Hoodies. Since I am working class, I am going to argue that we'll give that over-privileged posh lot a proper pasting but perhaps you think their superior financial recourses will mean they'll win the day? Rilo forfeited this round. |
![]() |
I am disappointed to note that my opponent has not had the opportunity to refute my argument. I assume he had more pressing matters to attend to, which would be understandable. However, I would like to take this opportunity to expand the debate as follows:
Come the Revolution, which will result in me being installed as Britain's rightful dictator :), the Workers will receive the justice the Upper Class Establishment has denied them for centuries. First and foremost, there will be a mass redistribution of wealth. In the UK, half the population share just 1% of the nation's wealth while the richest 1% control 34% of the total and the richest 5% own 58%. http://www.statistics.gov.uk... http://www.statistics.gov.uk... If the assets of the wealthiest 1% of the population were seized and distributed evenly between the remaining 99%, every working age person would receive �35,115 ($70,242). If the assets of the richest 5% were redistributed in a similar way, that figure would increase to �62,430 ($124,881). These calculations are based on 2003 figures, the latest available. However, the wealth of the country has increased substantially since then so the amount each person would actually receive would, in reality, be even greater than quoted above. Since the vast majority of the population will benefit from a huge financial windfall, it will be in almost everybody's interest to ensure the Revolution is successful – 370,000 posh people are never going to be able to resist 36,628,000 workers – no matter how many locks they have on their doors. I respectfully move that you vote Pro for the Revolution and a fairer Britain. Rilo forfeited this round. |
![]() |
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by JBlake 13 years ago
brian_eggleston | Rilo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by LandonWalsh 13 years ago
brian_eggleston | Rilo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by bexy_kelly 13 years ago
brian_eggleston | Rilo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by numa 14 years ago
brian_eggleston | Rilo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by brian_eggleston 14 years ago
brian_eggleston | Rilo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
I notice you live in the United States, a relatively young country, where you enjoy very much a classless society - similar to Canada, New Zealand and Australia in that respect.
In Britain, someone is identified immediately by their accent and treated accordingly. The most powerful and wealthy did not, for the most part, earn their elevated status in society, they were born into it. Even those successful in trade usually come from privileged backgrounds.
These privileges and social prejudices are deeply entrenched and permeate every aspect of life, denying able people the opportunity to realise their full potential as they would in a meritocracy, such as the US.
That said, I hope this debate will be light-hearted and humorous.