Democratie Directa
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/30/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,076 times | Debate No: | 59745 | ||
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (5)
Votes (4)
 Pro  Con NOTE: This is not part of my argument. My opponent's resolution is "direct democracy". He is using romanian, so it will only be logical for me to use romanian too. For those that don't understand romanian, please use Google Translate. It may not be very accurate but at least gives you an idea of what I'm arguing for. Adversarul meu face doar un punct în argumentul său: "Oamenii ar trebui sa aibe posibilitatea de a putea refuza in mod direct deciziile care le influenteaza viata." Cu toate acestea, acest lucru este usor de respins. Or înlăturată datorită faptului că în lumea modernă, popula ii mari de oameni există chiar ;i într-o zonă mică. Un exemplu bun este New York City, în care există milioane i milioane de oameni. [1] Într-o astfel de zonă, este imposibil pentru oameni să fie de acord;i încă respinge în mod direct deciziile de guvernul lor face în timp ce în mod efectiv efectuarea de drept. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... Vot mine. |
 |
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| DemocratieDirecta | 9spaceking | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con had a better arguement.
Vote Placed by Wylted 7 years ago
| DemocratieDirecta | 9spaceking | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: No rebuttals by pro also from what I know of English he spelled things incorrectly.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| DemocratieDirecta | 9spaceking | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con had an argument; Pro did not.
Vote Placed by Adam_Godzilla 7 years ago
| DemocratieDirecta | 9spaceking | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro asserts that people have a right to reject decisions that change their lives. Con offers a rebuttal and an example. Con deserves argument points. Also con provided a source, points are awarded. I will give a 'well done' point for pro in s&g for his use of Romania and confusing his readers.
http://direct-democracy.geschichte-schweiz.ch...
A valid argument would have been :
Peoples are to fool to decide for themself. Coz didn t was a challenge about technical system , but about a philosophy ... rather it is technically impossible ( which is not true )
But http://arstechnica.com....
India allready use e-voting from years.Id Estonia is a small cpountry , India isn t ( there was over 400 mill peoples who used e-votin and everything was finished in just few hours.
Ant at the end , it s all about a ideea not about technical possibilities , things that can change from a month to other.
"My opponent just make a point in his argument: "People should have the opportunity to directly reject the decisions that affect their lives." However, this is easily dismissed. Or removed because in the modern world, large populations of people are really, and in a small area. A good example is New York City, where there are millions and millions of people. [1] In such an area, it is impossible for people to agree, and yet directly reject their government makes decisions while effectively making law.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org... ...
Vote me."