The Instigator
backwardseden
Pro (for)
The Contender
Tamafaiga
Con (against)

Derek Chauvin, A true chauvinistic pig, Share the same character traits as the god of the bible

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Tamafaiga has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/1/2021 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 241 times Debate No: 127558
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

backwardseden

Pro

Derek Chauvin, A true chauvinistic pig, Shares the same character traits as the god of the bible, In which case the god of the bible according to the print is also a true chauvinistic pig. Now I'm not going to educate you on the slob who Derek Chauvin is as that's not my place nor problem. So no, You do not get to use typical word salad as an excuse for whatever menagerie ideals that will not work. The same is true as for the god of the bible. I'm not here to educate you on whatever it is to you in which case you cannot prove it exists with any kind of evidence to back up your claim(s) with evidence whatsoever, In which case you should 100% already know of these things listed below.

1. Both Chauvin and god are murderous
2. Both Chauvin and god are racist
3. Both Chauvin and god are tyrannical
4. Both Chauvin and god are bigoted
5. Both Chauvin and god are hateful
6. Both Chauvin and god choke the life out of others for no reason
7. Both Chauvin and god do not take "no" for an answer. . . In other words, Both Chauvin and god pay attention to themselves and only themselves especially in times of crisis
8. Both Chauvin and god are supreme superior god complex egotists
9. Both Chauvin and god cause suffering
10. Both Chauvin and god have the "believe in me or else" barbaric attitude

Prove the reasoning for each of the 10 listed above to be false.
The other two rules are:
1. This means that you believe Derek Chauvin is innocent of murder and is not racist, Tyrannical, Bigoted, Hateful, Did not choke the life out of George Floyd for no reason, And naturally did have a good reason for doing as such, Does not take "no" for an answer, Is not a superior god complex egotist, Did not cause suffering and does not believe in "believe in me or else" attitude. And most importantly show the "why? " this is so.
2. This also means that according to you, The god of the bible is innocent of murder and is not racist, Tyrannical, Bigoted, Hateful, Did and does not choke the life out of others for no reason, And naturally did have a good reason for doing as such, Does not take "no" for an answer, Is not a superior god complex egotist, Did and does not cause suffering and does not believe in the "believe in me or else" attitude. And most importantly show the "why? " this is so.

Sure, If you'd like, Prove that Derek Chauvin and the unproven storybook character fabled fantasy undefined whatever supposed "god" OF PRINT ONLY from a BOOK, Namely your bible, That nobody in the entire existence of the human race has ever been able to prove even exists do not share the same character traits that ARE NOT directly linked together.
Tamafaiga

Con

In order for you to make the argument, You must first be familiar with pigs. You have not laid any foundation for your accusation that indicates you know anything about pigs, Not to mention chauvinistic ones. Until you can prove you know what you are talking about I think your basis for such ridiculous accusations are just idiotic and show a complete lack of competence on the subject. Derek Chauvin was a police officer. His duty as we are to expect is to protect the public. We saw in his battle with Floyd that he was fighting a very strong and apparently drug enhanced individual. How he responded is clearly not the only option he had. He could have shot him or he could have let him go. He was in my opinion trying to subdue him so that he could take him in to custody as was warranted under the circumstances. The suspect in this case, George Floyd, Was resisting arrest. The situation was definitely NOT peaceful. It was very stressful not only for the suspect but for the police officer. The main issue is whether Officer Chauvin broke protocol and abused the training and his duty as an officer while trying to subdue a clearly antagonized Floyd. There is no evidence from what I know that Chauvin intended to kill Floyd. He was trying to make an arrest and put Floyd into the Police car. However, Due to a variety of circumstances which have come out, George Floyd died while he was being restrained.
I don't agree that Officer Chauvin is a murderer because there is no evidence that he intended to kill. That just was not proven. He acted with an intent to subdue. Not to kill. As a result he should not be convicted of murder. Manslaughter? Perhaps.
But the next statement is clearly something the person who started this debate just threw in to make someone angry or to inflame the Bible community who believe in God. Again this is someone who has not shown he knows God or has any dealings with God so how he can make these random accusations is like someone dissing McDonald's but yet have never eaten there. I would like to know how he can make these claims with no prior experience. Please how did God do you wrong? And the connection to Officer Chauvin is so random. . . I don't see the connection between the two. First of all lets see what kind of pig expert you are before we can give and credibility to your accusation of him being a Chauvinistic Pig. . . . And then make a logical connection between what happened to Floyd and the traits of God of the Bible. Until then please learn how to connect two accusations with logic and not just some random emotional statement that indicates your bias and obvious lack of rational thought.
Debate Round No. 1
backwardseden

Pro

We're done. Bye.
Tamafaiga

Con

LMAO. . . KO in 1st round?
Debate Round No. 2
backwardseden

Pro

What does mean to a clear teeny bopper white supremacist that you knowingly are "I'm not going to educate you on the slob who Derek Chauvin is as that's not my place nor problem. So no, You do not get to use typical word salad as an excuse for whatever menagerie ideals that will not work. The same is true as for the god of the bible. I'm not here to educate you on whatever it is to you in which case you cannot prove it exists with any kind of evidence to back up your claim(s) with evidence whatsoever, In which case you should 100% already know of these things listed below. " mean to you? Can you say "duh"?
Well, Your hero that you idolize and worship, Chauvin, Who is a chauvinistic pig in which case you don't even have the foggiest idea what that meaning is, Well tough s--t sony boy teeny bopper, That f--ker had---its---hands---in---his--pockets while choking the life out of Floyd AND it had its boots---off---the---ground while choking the life out of Floyd. So who gives a flying pregnant fetus screw with your inept teeny bopper cabbage batbrain believes that Chauvin is not a murderer.
Oh and btw, You cannot even prove that your unproven storybook character fabled fantasy undefined whatever supposed "god" OF PRINT ONLY from a BOOK, Namely your bible, That nobody in the entire existence of the human race has ever been able to prove even exists.
Regardless, According to your idiot bankrupt and immoral idiot tepid sheepish bore of a pissed on bible, Your unproven undefined "god" in it committed every single horrifying thing mentioned. . .
murder, Racism, Being tyrannical, Being bigoted, Hateful ah yes, Choking the life out of others for no reason, Does not take "no" for an answer. . . In other words, Playing god to get attention to itself and only itselfself especially in times of crisis, Is a supreme superior god complex egotist in which case the bible is all about and nothing else except for sheer terror and hate from this character you supposedly call a "god", It causes horrific suffering, Has the "believe in me or else" barbaric attitude" + whole lot more. Oh yes, You a pale blue bruised little nothingness have clearly not read your skunk perfume bible nor do you know anything at all about your stale eyes glued shut from a slaughterhouse hero Chauvin, Who is a chauvinistic pig.
Case closed. Toodles.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.