Diamond should be much, much more cheaper.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
MASTERY
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 3/13/2014 | Category: | Economics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 864 times | Debate No: | 48994 | ||
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)
 Con Welcome to this debate. First round is for defining and last round is for concluding. I define diamond as "a metastable allotrope of carbon, where the carbon atoms are arranged in a variation of the face-centered cubic crystal structure called a diamond lattice" pictured like  .I define much, much more cheaper as "easily affordable by a standard household without debt, for example, $10 /per carat".  Pro |
 |
|
Con Thank you for accepting my debate. So, why should diamond remain at its price? Say, if its price surges down, diamond producer businesses will lose money. In turn, they will not produce diamond, thus destroying its worth all together. Many diamond investors would lose lots of money as well, giving way to a pure financial crash. This financial crash will damage the economy severely. Thank You. Pro Benshapiro forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Pro Benshapiro forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Pro Benshapiro forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con I might as well post the time limit for each debate to avoid confusion next time. Pro Benshapiro forfeited this round. |
 |
Post a Comment
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by MASTERY 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by oculus_de_logica 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by MASTERY 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Krazzy_Player 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by MASTERY 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Benshapiro 7 years ago
Report this Comment
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 7 years ago
| MASTERY | Benshapiro | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con made arguments and didn't forfeit any rounds.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 7 years ago
| MASTERY | Benshapiro | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument was never contested. Conduct to Con for Pro's full-forfeit.
