Did the holocaust happen?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
TheDebateMaster1
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/6/2014 | Category: | Education | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 2,250 times | Debate No: | 60056 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (7)
 Con 1. If gas chambers really existed, there would be blue build up of Zyklon B on the walls. None were ever found - those chambers were used for delousing. 2. No mass graves were ever found. |
 |
|
Con |
 |
|
Con 2 In the book titled 'Night', by Eli Wiesel, he doesn't mention gas being used, and when the choice came that he would retreat with the Germans or stay and be under the Soviet umbrella he chose to retreat with the Germans. 2 Auschwitz was a place where synthetic rubber was being produced. No US intelligence report EVER mentions gas chambers! 5 Jews took a census of their people before WW2 . If 6 million died, EVERY Jewish women on the PLANET would have to have had 13 children.  Pro -Good Debate Youtube has Lots of video clips of nazi camps. Ausscwitz is a museum, and you can see the camp, lots of burials were found, so argument 1 is invalid. Really, which books did you read by Churchill. Cite the cencus next time. Ther your entire argument is invalid |
 |
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by CountCheechula 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: This one is just common sense to be honest.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Squo is holocaust happened, giving Con BOP. Con failed to provide sources, needed to.
Vote Placed by Saska 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con wasted a round, because "I accept this debate" is apparently confusing as to which side his opponent is on. Con loses conduct points for that, considering most debates on this site begin the first round with the opponent accepting the debate. I give sources to Pro, not because he used sources, but because he did not need to, while Con makes multiple claims requiring sources that he does not supply. And arguments go to Pro because Pro's argument is verifiable. Pro could have done a better job, but given the pitiful job done by Con, nothing more was required.
Vote Placed by YaHey 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Neither made a great argument, but Pro has truth on their side. Also, screw fascists.
Vote Placed by Mr.Lincoln 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Of course the Holocaust was real. It was tragedy and should have never happened.
Vote Placed by SocialistAtheistNutjob 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con cited no sources. Con's burden of proof was nowhere near met. Pro also had better grammar.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 7 years ago
| americanfascist | TheDebateMaster1 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: CON had full BoP, but relied on a claim of the absence of evidence to support his position. CON also had more spelling errors.
@Saska, that's the same place that spouts stuff like gender is a spectrum and that intersectional feminism is great, also ran by a Jew.
http://rationalwiki.org...
Read over that site as a starter... there is plenty of evidence for it. If you are denying it, you are doing nothing more than showing willful ignorance. Just because you don't want it to be true, that doesn't make it not true.
I've been to Dachau in Germany. They have videos of the soldiers overtaking the camp, with video evidence of the mass graves. There are copies of speeches that Hitler made saying he is going to hang every Jew. There is so much evidence that it happened....