The Instigator
Loveshismom
Con (against)
Loveshismom
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
charlie97
Pro (for)
charlie97
Losing
0 Points

Did the sky have a baby (pro) or a Weegee (con)?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Loveshismom
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/22/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,209 times Debate No: 59162
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Loveshismom

Con

The sky had a Weegee because nothing similar babies ever falls from the sky but similar things to Weegee fall from the sky.

What falls from the sky and how it is similar to Weegee:

Rain- kills you and pops up unexpectedly; looking directly into its "eye" is very risky; don't be around it unprotected

Hail- kills you and is unpredictable; does damage; don't be around it unprotected

Snow- unpredictable and can kill you; don't be around it unprotected.

Babies don't kill you and you don't need to wear anything specific around babies. They're unpredictable but their unpredictable actions can be accounted for by anyone intelligent and responsible and you can't do that when the case is Weegee. Therefore the sky had a Weegee and not a baby.
Report this Argument
charlie97

Pro

First of all, that's Mama Luigi to you! The sky had a baby, as a Weegee, though conceptually understood to be dangerous and ultimately creepy, must first retreat to his rightful lair for Spaghetti. This is a fundamental part of a Weegee's birth and, if the victim did not himself witness the consumption of Spaghetti or, at the least, the retreat towards the lair, it is impossible for that entity of which to have fallen to become a Weegee, as one such Weegee cannot survive for more than thirty seconds. If the victim could bear the sight of this entity for an excess of thirty seconds, than it cannot be a Weegee either.
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 1
Loveshismom

Con

Mama Luigi?! >XDDDDDD!!! First off, I didn't find any of that on Weegee's article on the YTP wiki [1]. Your point is moot. Weegee's YTP wiki article also states that the only similarity between him and the real Luigi is their appearance. This means that Weegee is not supposed to eat Italian food, leaving anything about Italian food impertinent to this debate.

Rebuttal: "... a Weegee... must first retreat to his rightful lair for Spaghetti. This is a fundamental part of a Weegee's birth and, if the victim did not himself witness the consumption of Spaghetti or, at the least, the retreat towards the lair, it is impossible for that entity of which to have fallen to become a Weegee, as one such Weegee cannot survive for more than thirty seconds."


First of all, Weegee reproduces asexually by looking at people and turning them into Weegees, which means that anything in your argument requiring a Weegee to eat Italian food or be a baby does not pertain to it at all.

CONCLUSION:

Pro's argument is completely impertinent to this debate and completely false unless we are not talking about the same kind of Weegee.

Source:

[1]- http://youtubepoop.wikia.com...
Report this Argument
charlie97

Pro

Dude, I had no idea that this was a serious argument, I honestly thought you were messing around and making stuff up. Feel free to reply to this, but I'm not issuing a further response.
Report this Argument
 Debate Round No. 2
Loveshismom

Con

Actually this was a joke argument and I was messing around and making stuff up.
Report this Argument
charlie97

Pro

charlie97 forfeited this round.
 Debate Round No. 3
Loveshismom

Con

What a disappointment
Report this Argument
charlie97

Pro

charlie97 forfeited this round.
 Debate Round No. 4
Loveshismom

Con

Weegees are immortal and they don't need to set spaghetti
Report this Argument
charlie97

Pro

charlie97 forfeited this round.
 Debate Round No. 5
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
lannan13
Loveshismomcharlie97Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: FF

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.