Does the Bible copy mythology and other religions?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
thenewkidd
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/5/2014 | Category: | Religion | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,115 times | Debate No: | 58598 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (10)
Votes (2)
I am debating that the Bible does not take mythology and is based on its own ideas. I will be demonstrating that the other religions have actually taken the Bible stories and put it in their religion. I will be discussing that the Bible has no contradictions but it does have many translations. But this does not mean its infallible. Lastly, I will be presenting that the Bible can be misunderstood when people put their own "feelings" into it. My opponent can start off with the conversation.
This could be interesting, Though I am a man of faith and believe in the bible, I believe I can find fault in many of your arguments and will challenge you thusly. |
![]() |
nadlor1 forfeited this round.
Though it's technically over since my opponent opted out on posting his arguments (and since said "I can go first".. I opted out to go first).. I will post the first half of what I prepared for kicks. The Bible was compiled in 367 AD. The bible as we know it today only has existed for about 1600 years or so. So for anything of other religious stories had to be copied from this book it would have had to be compiled after the fact. Which would mean if there are other religions with stories that existed before that time could be possible that the Bible "copied" from them. Let's start with Atenism was a religion with writings that have existed since about 14th century BC with some of the oldest religous texts found. Buddhism also has writings from the 6th and 4th centeries BC. And with Druidism having writings just before 200 to 50 BC. All way before the Bible was even thought to be compiled. As I'm sure not everything has to be "written" to create a story we have Greek and Roman Gods and their Mythos that far outdate the creativity of the bible, but the Greek Religion has been around since 1200BC so the story of Prometheus coming to earth to create human kind out of mud/clay outdates the story told of Adam and Eve in the bible some 1300 years later. As we say in Psalms 90:3.. Back to dust after we die which infers that were were made from dust as we cannot go back to (or revert) to something if we were not in that state before. When we die we go back to dust wich infers we were made from Dust. Interesting that the Greeks made us from the ground and the bible infers the same thing. and The bible wasn't plagiarized at all from Greek Mythos? http://www.biblica.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://messagenetcommresearch.com... http://www.greekmythology.com... |
![]() |
nadlor1 forfeited this round.
See Arguments Above. |
![]() |
nadlor1 forfeited this round.
I guess it is over. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Sagey 7 years ago
nadlor1 | thenewkidd | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con Forfeited, Pro provided the only argument and had better conduct
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
nadlor1 | thenewkidd | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
Trojan Flood, Black Sea Flood, Nile Flood and of course the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Take your pick, but the Tigris/Euphrates (Epic of Gilgamesh) appears to be the most probable, since a tablet was found on the top of the highest building in Ur, stating that the world was covered in water.
Which actually meant that there was water as far as his/her eyes could see, likely only around 10 miles from the observer. so a 10 mile radius from Ur was covered by water.
The Bible writers had been told about the tablet and took this to mean the entire Earth was covered by water, thus the Genesis story.
Plus another.
He didn't say "monotheistic" he just say "religion"
Surely the argument only applies to Monotheist religions, though likely even Buddhism existed long before Abraham lived.
Should be interesting.
We shall see.
Tip : watch Zetigeist : The Movie. It's on Netflix. It's mainly crap, and turn it off before you get to the part about 9/11, which is interesting also, but also largely crap.
However, what the movie doesn't vastly conspiracize (which is not a word, but I think it SHOULD be a word), it brings up good points on. I certainly wouldn't use it as a source, but I would take some of the things it mentions and find actual sources on them. Very interesting documentary.