Donald Trump
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
omar2345
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 11/16/2018 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 892 times | Debate No: | 119019 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (24)
Votes (1)
 Con  Pro Define: Disgrace Define: Racist He talks about building walls to block out other countries. - Is this the reason why he is racist from the definition you have given? I assuming this: If you agree with my definitions then there is no need to add your own Disgrace: loss of reputation or respect as the result of a dishonourable action. Racist:a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, Or who believes that a particular race is superior to another You were not direct enough why Trump is a disgrace so I want you to elaborate. Trump is not a disgrace because the economy is doing well. Trump is not a racist for protecting his own country. For having borders you stop illegal aliens from coming across the border. This is not fair on people who are legally going through to the United States. This also does not help the alien in question because since they are not registered US citizen the laws are not bound to them. This means businesses can exploit aliens, Paying them less then the minimum wage, Unsafe working conditions and refuse to pay them and call ICE to deport them so that they get free labour. The free labour is an accusation but 7-eleven did release a statement that more or less suggests that if illegal aliens do not work sufficiently to their standard they will be deported by ICE. Without walls there are no countries. If we have no countries then Anarchy will reign. It won't be everyone will be happier, It will consist of China migrating resources to the United States and attempting to take control of the United States. No centralised government no way in working together to stop China from invading and controlling the United States. Source: https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=xo3agk7mMp8 http://nymag. Com/intelligencer/2018/11/7-eleven-ice-raids. Html |
 |
|
Con zrosier6476 forfeited this round.
|
 |
|
Con zrosier6476 forfeited this round.
|
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
| zrosier6476 | omar2345 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con f2f over half of the rounds. This is poor conduct.
Just an assumption.
Bernie I would say the only person in the DNC I would vote for. Even though some of his policies are not helpful but with issues he does not appeal to the far-left and goes for what is right instead of doing what is trendy like abolish ICE which was a mainstream DNC view until they got elected. Bernie knew ICE was not the problem it was the regulation and legislation they had to follow. It is like blaming the army for following the orders even though the soldiers were not one giving them.
If Hillary and Bernie were neck and neck with votes. The party would decide who they wanted to pick instead of the voters. If the democrats did not decide it would have been Bernie v Trump for the 2016 presidency.
Donna Brazile's quote about DNC in the run up to the 2016 presidential election.
"I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, But I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff. I had gone department by department, Investigating individual conduct for evidence of skewed decisions, And I was happy to see that I had found none. Then I found this agreement.
"The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, But it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, One campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, But as I saw it, It compromised the party"s integrity. "