Ebola brought to the U.S.A., is it all a big government conspiracy?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Blackdeath17
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 8/4/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,355 times | Debate No: | 59937 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)
Honestly, I can't see how anyone could truly believe in such nonsense. Some people say that Obama brought Ebola to the United States so he could "control the population", or "take away our freedoms". I say that's ridiculous. Obama allowed the Ebola infected patient into the U.S. so he could have access to the best medical care and have the best chance for surviving. The CDC has some of the best prevention and containment methods on the planet, they will do everything in their power to prevent an Ebola outbreak. The threat of transmission of Ebola from that patient to anyone else is slim to none. If you really think about it, there is absolutely no reason to not have brought an Ebola infected patient to the United States for treatment.
Ebola has been brought to the US by Obama so that everyone gets infected. Right now it may seem like the US have the situation under control but pretty soon the US will bring more Ebola infected patients to 'help' them. During this time the virus will adapt to the american soil and slowly spread (due to bringing people in quarantine). This will give Obama the excuse that no US citizens should escape the country so that the disease doesn't spread to other countries. |
![]() |
Arationalperson forfeited this round.
wait i'm new so I'm wondering. Do I win? |
![]() |
Arationalperson forfeited this round.
Blackdeath17 forfeited this round. |
![]() |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Wylted 7 years ago
Arationalperson | Blackdeath17 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: forfeited more rounds
Yep. Quite dumb.
"How fast it kills is actually a good thing, because it keeps it from spreading to fast."
That is what they thought in Outbreak too. ;)
Because that has worked so well with the common cold, cancer and HIV.
How fast it kills is actually a good thing, because it keeps it from spreading to fast.