The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)


Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
David.Cameron has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/27/2018 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 286 times Debate No: 113230
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Evolutionism is clearly the most likely explanation for the creation of life. We evolve and that has been explained and prooved over and over again by science.


Evolution, or "evolutionism" as you refer to it, does not offer the most likely explanation for the CREATION of life. The biological theory does not deal with the origin of life on earth, but how speciation occurs. For scientific theories of the origin of life, see abiogenesis theories.
Debate Round No. 1


Yeah sure. My mistake, I m still new at this sorry. What I meant by that is that in my point of view science has a much better explanation of how it all happened than religion (in particularly Christianity, which is the one I m most familiar with). The idea that human kind started out with Adam and Eve is too me impossible to believe in especially because the other option (evolution) is much more believable, not just by all the proof we ve got but also for the logic it presents.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.