The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
1 Points

Executive Compensation Should be Limited

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/20/2019 Category: Economics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 526 times Debate No: 120406
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




Executive Compensation should be limited. It allows for corruption and takes valuable dollars away from middle to lower class workers and gives CEO's all the power up top. Wage disparity.



I will gladly participate in this debate, Assuming we agree upon the definition of "executive compensation. " According to Businessdictionary. Com, The definition of executive compensation is: "The financial payments and non monetary benefits provided to high level management in exchange for their work on behalf of an organization. "

If this is an agreeable definition, Then I look forward to the debate.
Debate Round No. 1


liv12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


liv12 forfeited this round.


Well, It seems that he does not want to debate.

This is a really interesting topic, And I was looking forward to the debate. In lieu of the pro, I'm willing to accept this debate with anyone else.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by oalks 3 years ago
Really wish he would've stuck around, This seemed like a really fun thing to discuss.
Posted by zapp 3 years ago
I would like to try taking up this debate, It it's alright.
Posted by WrickItRalph 3 years ago
It's an awesome topic. I'm not sure if I would honestly be able to take the opposition. I believe that some forms of executive compensation could be necessary. But I also think that CEOs should have a maximum wage. I kind of fall in to the foggy gray area here. :)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by EverlastingMoment 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Unfortunate, because it's a very interesting debate topic. Pro's untimely exit pretty much stopped the debate from starting so conduct goes to Con.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.