The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Fasting is the cure to cancer?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
XJulchenX has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/13/2018 Category: Health
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 376 times Debate No: 112723
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)



Cancer cure:

Arguments from fat pig food addicts:


No, fasting is not the cure to cancer. The two don't correlate at all. Yes mutated cells do use glucose and sugar as an energy source, but one could also just move onto a diet that can move those out of your current diet as well. Fasting could also make it worse, because when your body is trying to fight off it needs energy to do so, but when you don't have any energy to spare you'll just end up making possibly worse.
Debate Round No. 1


The cancer becomes food and water for your body when you dry fast, and when you eat the body focuses its energy on breaking down bacteria in the food and breaking down the food for energy.. my entire estimation on diseases is that they come simply from over eating, sugar included, and the healthiest state your body can be in is when your blood sugar is low, and eating multiple times a day even eating a candy bar here and there keeps spiking your insulin. one can be a food addict as well as a sugar addict
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.