Fox News is Bad
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 2/10/2008 | Category: | Entertainment | ||
Updated: | 14 years ago | Status: | Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 4,076 times | Debate No: | 2521 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (22)
Fox News is not bad, nor is it evil. For this, I would like to here concrete evidence why you think that they're evil.
Lets get something straight, it doesnt have to be evil to be bad. Fox news is BAD for the following reasons: 1) it promotes bias through the syphering of political opinions. Many of the pundants on the show are to one side of the spectrum. 2) sensationalism promotes a lack of integrity within the journalist community, especially by the number one station in america. 3) The CEO uses the channel to promote his own persoanl agenda. |
![]() |
According to your guidelines why Fox News is bad, EVERY news medium would be considered "bad!"
1) it promotes bias through the syphering of political opinions. Many of the pundants on the show are to one side of the spectrum. Yes, this is true, but I don't see anything wrong, because every other news medium is doing that, the only difference is that they are liberal, and Fox News is conservative. 2) sensationalism promotes a lack of integrity within the journalist community, especially by the number one station in america. Sensationalism is used by every other news station, and this was before Fox News. I agree, I do not like sensationalism (If only Bill O'Reilly didn't talk about child molestation so much on "The Factor," I would watch it more often), but seriously, it's not the only news medium doing this. 3) The CEO uses the channel to promote his own persoanl agenda. The CEO's of the other news mediums ALSO do this. Case and Point: Ted Turner and CNN. I just don't see what is wrong.
1) Agreed, the resolution you posted was Fox news is bad. i definatly think juggernaut news cos. like CNN, MSNBC ect. are harmful alongside FOX 2) Refer to number one. 3) And again, refer to number one. If youre looking for some reason that FOX is worse, you can see that they do this to such a greater extent (especially #s 2 and 3). If you can agree that those 3 things are problems and constitute a "Bad" media outlet, than a close examination will show you that FOX is the worst or tied for worst of the major outlets. |
![]() |
I agree with you with #2, but seriously, the only major conservative outlet is being attacked for apparently no reason but that they are conservative, not liberal. That was what I was aiming at with this debate, but I see that this debate is valid, too.
But anyway, back to the debate. #1 and #3, I have no concern.
I understand your point of view, and i agree that many anti-FOXers are such simply because they are anti-conservative, but there are very valid reasons why to support the fact that FOX is a bad news outlet. Im glad we cna conquer to this fact. Thanks for your time, good luck with the votes. ,jonathan |
![]() |
22 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Hypnodoc 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Conservative 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by Derek.Gunn 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by blond_guy 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by HandsOff 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by inrainbows 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by jbg 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by kato0291 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by SportsGuru 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Zombie 14 years ago
C-Mach | ComradeJon1 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
CNN - Communist News Network
MSNBC - Maoist/Stalinist National Broadcast Communism
ABC - Arrogant Broadcast Communism
CBS - Communist Broadcasting System
If Fox News is bad..please put in some other names as well such as big news channels like CNN. The problem is Fox News's Bias correct? Well Newsflash - Can you name one news channel that ISN'T Bias? What about channels like regular fox, CNN, msnbc?? Does it not matter that they are Bias?? For some reason everyone feels the need to attack Fox News for swinging to the right..but decides to ignore the fact that majority of news channels swing to the left.
Secondly keep in mind that reporting news and their talk shows are two different things. They do a fantastic job at reporting the news as it happens --the things they say in their talk shows..will obviously have a bias opinion due to the fact that it IS a talk show after all.
As I mentioned earlier.. I don't understand why democrats feel the need to trash anyone and anything that doesn't agree with their perspective. Just turn the channel to CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and you'll find the coverage to be more than satisfactory. Skip over Fox News libbies, its not good for your health to expose yourself to other perspectives.