Free will and determinism are NOT compatible
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/6/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 632 times | Debate No: | 58621 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)
Debate formatted as follows:
Round 1- Accept Round 2-Openings (No rebuttals!) Round 3-Expansion of ideas, rebuttals allowed Round 4-Only rebuttals accepted Round 5-Closing In order to avoid devolving into semantics, accepting this debate means accepting the Oxford Dictionary's definition free will: "The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one"s own discretion." Questions in the comments, I'm looking forward to lively debate.
YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IN DETERMINlSM! |
![]() |
el_tecnico forfeited this round.
toughenough forfeited this round. |
![]() |
el_tecnico forfeited this round.
toughenough forfeited this round. |
![]() |
el_tecnico forfeited this round.
toughenough forfeited this round. |
![]() |
el_tecnico forfeited this round.
toughenough forfeited this round. |
![]() |
No votes have been placed for this debate.
"The power of acting without constraint of necessity; the ability to act at one's own discretion".
Now it simply becomes a question of whether or not the "laws of physics" should tie into "necessity" or "one's own discretion".
It is my belief that the "necessity" and "discretion" of an action is what arises after realizing it is possible and thus "necessity" is not constrained by physics.
Taking "determinism" to mean something like "an infinitely powerful turing machine, given a starting state and the laws of physics, can perfectly simulate the universe, including humans' decisions and actions" while accepting "free will" to take on its more political/societal definition rather than its physical one (which seems like a ridiculous way to define it in my opinion), they seem reconcilable to me. Of course, my assumptions are my own. My takes on "necessity" and "discretion" are debatable.