The Instigator
Ny-Jianah
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
armoredcat
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points

Gay kid show characters?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
armoredcat
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/18/2018 Category: TV
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,369 times Debate No: 118608
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (2)

 

Ny-Jianah

Con

This is not right. Children will become confused. Not that I am against gay relationships or people. Definitely against children watching two princesses kiss. As working at a daycare has taught me, Children do what they see or hear. Just take that and brainstorm what you think the generation will turn into if this was to happen. If a child feels a certain way towards someone just like everyone we all learn what the feeling of butterflies or just having a crush. If your child is feeling that way towards a friend that is a girl then that is your time to explain or if your child is just curious about to females\males out in public, Not just put it in their brain that they can have either. Children under the age of 12 watch disney channel. There will be no such thing as friendships or any other kind of relationships. Just not right and definitely doesn't sound right enough for people who vote yes on this.
armoredcat

Pro

> This is not right. Children will become confused

So you are scared of children becoming confused due to seeing something that is foreign to them? This seems unreasonable.

> Not that I am against gay relationships or people

But you seem to be, Judging by your opposition to gay relationships being shown on television for kids to see due to your fear of kids becoming gay.

> As working at a daycare has taught me, Children do what they see or hear.

Okay, Sure.

> If a child feels a certain way towards someone just like everyone we all learn what the feeling of butterflies or just having a crush. If your child is feeling that way towards a friend that is a girl then that is your time to explain or if your child is just curious about to females\males out in public,

I can sort of piece together what Con is trying to say here, Which seems like a rambling about something unrelated to the topic, But it's ridiculously incoherent, Which is Con's fault, Not mine. For this reason, I am going to disregard the entire argument.

> Not just put it in their brain that they can have either.

But why shouldn't people be in homosexual relationships? They tend to be longer, Better, And more stable than straight ones [1]. If you were opposed to love relationships being shown on television I could understand, But your specific rejection of homosexual relationships makes no sense.

> There will be no such thing as friendships or any other kind of relationships.

Another completely incoherent statement.

> Just not right and definitely doesn't sound right enough for people who vote yes on this.

So for no reason, It's "just not right" and "it doesn't sound right enough"?

To conclude, Con's arguments are bizarrely structured nonsense and are not factually supported whatsoever.
I have proved that gay relationships tend to be more stable than straight ones, Making her concerns completely invalid.

Vote Pro.

SOURCES:

[1]https://www. Psychologytoday. Com/us/blog/disturbed/201311/gay-relationships-can-be-more-stable-straight-ones
Debate Round No. 1
Ny-Jianah

Con

Ny-Jianah forfeited this round.
armoredcat

Pro

Extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Ny-Jianah

Con

Ny-Jianah forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
Block19
Are you proposing that there is a straight gene, Or that sexuality is genetic?
Posted by Masterful 3 years ago
Masterful
Why do kids need to be exposed to ideas regarding sexual attraction? They're kids you fools.
Posted by Masterful 3 years ago
Masterful
No one is born gay unless you're willing to make an argument for a gay gene.
Gayness is environmental, Boys who grow up without male influence are far more likely to become gay than those with male influence.
Putting gay ideas intot he heads of our children, Is known as 'Gayification' whereby homosexuality is intentionally being spread.
Posted by unicorngod 3 years ago
unicorngod
Yea the worst part is people aren"t normalizing same sex relationships so if you don"t want to explain it to kids that"s on you not society
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
Block19
Fair
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
Whats the difference between a kid seeing a prince and princess kiss, And two princes/princesses kiss? You are saying that kids seeing gay relationships will stop friendship? Sorry if I sound stupid but I really do not understand con's line of reasoning here, To me it makes no sense at all.
Posted by badgerbucks 3 years ago
badgerbucks
I agree anything other than heterosexuality should not be consummated. Sex should be viewed with means of reproduction and not pleasure as it has been popularized. Humanity is not intellectually consistent with what they preach.
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
Block19
Wait, There is a tv show staring a full cast of gay kids?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by alexstilts 3 years ago
alexstilts
Ny-JianaharmoredcatTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I see this argument as vaguely ridiculous, with the Con as clearly homophobic, so this was an easy vote.
Vote Placed by zhaod1 3 years ago
zhaod1
Ny-JianaharmoredcatTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made many irrevelant arguments and attempts to make one argument that gay show characters may influence kids to view homosexuality as something ok. However, Pro effectively refuted the argument, citing that people involved gay relationships live longer and better than straight relationships. In addition, Con forfeited 2 rounds. Conduct, argument, and sources go to Pro.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.