The Instigator
Pro (for)
Anonymous
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
badgerbucks
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

God say anything about why he made females with a little penis?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/18/2018 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 598 times Debate No: 118606
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (0)

 

Pro

Fkin bs religion
badgerbucks

Con

God said nothing about why he made females with little penises because it was never a question of whether it should or should not exist, But rather an unfolding of human events that it came about. A certain lack-luster of energies has produced much confusion in this area, Of which I will clear up.

When God made man and woman it was such that it had to be so, Or neither could exist. You see there are two energies: Masculine and feminine. And within each of these bodies both man and woman exists these two energies. A man must consist of both masculine and feminine in order to exist, It cannot be any other way. A woman must consist of both masculine and feminine in order to exist, It cannot be any other way. This is because femininity is the absence of masculinity and vice versa, In the same way that darkness is the absence of light.

This imbalance of energies, Of the body constantly experiencing either one in dominance of the other creates a desire for the other to achieve perfect balance, Harmony, Peace or bliss. This is evident through the desire for sex. We desire sex with the opposing energy as it is the only way in which many of us can experience both in equilibrium. You will see that many asexual people do not desire sex as they have balanced these two energies. Now you see because of this imbalance of energies, It is entirely possible for there to exist a feminine man, Or a masculine woman. Because these energies are not synonymous with our sex. A feminine man will always look for a masculine other as a masculine woman will seek a feminine partner. All of such is entirely up to our identity and which character we choose to uphold.

This creates confusion among others, As they start to seek sex as more than just a rub of the foreskin. And with such a thought pattern that they must be filled with the company of a compatible and opposite mix of the energy they embody through rites of sex, They come to seek company which is inclusive of same sex.

With this imbalance of energies comes the assignment of confusion between our inner world and outer world. With it comes a new problem of self-acceptance and acceptance of others. Many people (transgenders) have adopted this idea that they must make their body look like how they feel inside and want others to refer to them as such instead of upholding a self-love and respect for the vessel they have been gifted. You see they have seen it that other males/females act in the way that they feel inside and thus assign a connection that they must too look like that " that they feel like this and therefore to fit into the world they must look like this. And thus begins a process of tearing the body apart to fit the image they have of themselves which was taught to them by the external. Rather than accept their body as it is, They choose to form it into a new way of being that is artificial and fight to be acknowledged as natural in a plea for acceptance which they assign in the form of their body. That is to say, They want others to acknowledge their inner selves by accepting this body which has been morphed to represent their "me. "

So you see this is my first-point. That we were taught a certain way of thinking and as such transgenderism has come from it. We have only ourselves to look at when searching for answers as to how this came about. And we can only look at the way we have taught self-acceptance and balancing energies when it comes to such desires in other individuals: Not God.
Debate Round No. 1

Pro

It speaks for randomness and evolution, Not a god
badgerbucks

Con

TL;DR We're arguing the same point.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
You are talking about dots aren't you
Posted by canis 3 years ago
canis
Humans caused a lot of gods. I just shoot from the hips and present you a male god. A god who was alone. The only way he could have his penis su. . . Was by having a big/long one. Then I imagine you can imagine that females poped into existence. . A hole and a stick is probably better then two sticks. . Now you can say "thank you my prophet".
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
Block19
No, But the fact that you can't speak in full paragraphs and have to take a mental break after each sentence, Makes it difficult to follow your train of thought.
Posted by DeletedUser 3 years ago
DeletedUser
I will warn you, Block thinks his misunderstanding of you arguments is an argument
Posted by Block19 3 years ago
Block19
i will warn you, Vi is not known for being logical, Reasonable, Or coherent.
Posted by badgerbucks 3 years ago
badgerbucks
I'm thinking of accepting this challenge, But just want to know what your actual stance is. I don't know whether you're arguing that transgenderism is stupid or something else.
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.