Half-Full not Half-Empty
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ClashnBoom
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 4/6/2015 | Category: | Miscellaneous | ||
Updated: | 6 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 762 times | Debate No: | 72987 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)
I would like to argue that it is in better context to refer to a container, filled with liquid up to a halfway point, to be considered half full. My reasoning is that the default state of a cup is empty. When one makes a change, it should be referred to in relation to that change. Say, you're painting a house. At the halfway mark, would you consider it half painted or half unpainted? Say there was a car, and one side was sprayed down with a hose. Half dry or half wet? It would be silly to call something that's only half the trait of it's default state. A cup is not filled ultimately before being filled. A case where half empty would be appropriate would be on a noun like a Lake. The default state of a lake is filled with water, so in a draining process, it'd be considered half empty. I rest my case.
You stated that if a glass is filled to the half point it is then half full but what if the glass was full then you drank half of it? To your reasoning the cup would be half empty since you said "When one makes a change, it should be referred to in relation to that change." so it depends on the state of the glass. If you just painted a house then while wet it rained which caused half of the house's paint to disappear would you consider it half painted of half unpainted? If there was a car that is wet then you dry half of it is it half dry or wet? I think if it was full then halted then it should be called half empty if it was empty then filled halfway then it should be called half full. Before there was a lake there was a patch of dry land.( Sorry for my bad grammar.) |
![]() |
flippinflipster forfeited this round.
I extend all my arguments. |
![]() |
flippinflipster forfeited this round.
Vote for the one who didn't forfeit. |
![]() |
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 6 years ago
flippinflipster | ClashnBoom | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by YoshiBoy13 6 years ago
flippinflipster | ClashnBoom | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con: Double forfeit combo! Massive damage! // Grammar was about even on both sides // Arguments to Con: Provided compromise with better representation of what would happen.
Vote Placed by tejretics 6 years ago
flippinflipster | ClashnBoom | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF. The reasoning of it being half-empty is because of the psychological direction to finish something, and finishing it halfway, meaning something is half-empty in progressive status, as pointed out clearly by Con. The argument was logical and Pro failed to address it as they forfeited. 4 points to Con.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 6 years ago
flippinflipster | ClashnBoom | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con came up with some impactful counter-arguments that required addressing. Pro never addressed these in his/her ff. So, arguments and conduct to Con.
I go for the latter,
'Coz it doesn't matter.